본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소년법 목적조항의 “반사회성이 있는 소년” 문언에 관한 비판적 고찰

A Critical Review of Phrase “Antisocial Juvenile” in the Purpose Provision of the Juvenile Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Juvenile Act Article 1 stipulates “Antisocial juveniles” as the superior concept of the juveniles subject to juvenile protective Disposition in Article. 4. This wording is problematic in that it is appropriate for the purpose of the Juvenile Act. From the perspective of the interpretation of the meaning of the wording or the appropriateness of the legal concept, this wording raises questions about whether the meaning of the wording itself is unclear or systematically inconsistent. Although the ideology of juvenile protection is the guiding ideology of the Juvenile Act, the ideology of juvenile protection is not achieved solely by the Juvenile Act, which is part of the criminal law domain. Among the entire legal domains that can achieve the ideology of juvenile protection, the Juvenile Act is responsible for only a partial domain, and the Juvenile Act, which is a special criminal law, is only the final means of achieving the purpose pursued by the ideology of juvenile protection, and cannot be the sole means (sola ratio) or the first means (prima ratio). Under the pretext of juvenile protection, the criminal justice agency should not intervene in all possible areas through its intervention. The areas of welfare and treatment should be transferred to the protection and welfare-related legislation, and the areas that support or replace the role of parental care should be transferred to the civil law domain. The phrase “antisocial juveniles” does not fit the purpose clause of the Juvenile Act, which is responsible for a part of the realization of the idea of ​​juvenile protection. According to the current understanding of language, antisocial means antisocial personality disorder. Juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, and crime prone juveniles are not antisocial juveniles. Therefore, antisocial juveniles are not suitable as a superordinate concept encompassing the juveniles subject to the Juvenile Act. The phrase “antisocial juveniles” should be revised to a value-neutral, clear phrase that eliminates ambiguity and uncertainty so that anyone can understand its meaning. I believe that the elimination of such uncertainty could also lead to the abolition of the crime prone juvenile regulation.

Abstract

The Juvenile Act Article 1 stipulates “Antisocial juveniles” as the superior concept of the juveniles subject to juvenile protective Disposition in Article. 4. This wording is problematic in that it is appropriate for the purpose of the Juvenile Act. From the perspective of the interpretation of the meaning of the wording or the appropriateness of the legal concept, this wording raises questions about whether the meaning of the wording itself is unclear or systematically inconsistent. Although the ideology of juvenile protection is the guiding ideology of the Juvenile Act, the ideology of juvenile protection is not achieved solely by the Juvenile Act, which is part of the criminal law domain. Among the entire legal domains that can achieve the ideology of juvenile protection, the Juvenile Act is responsible for only a partial domain, and the Juvenile Act, which is a special criminal law, is only the final means of achieving the purpose pursued by the ideology of juvenile protection, and cannot be the sole means (sola ratio) or the first means (prima ratio). Under the pretext of juvenile protection, the criminal justice agency should not intervene in all possible areas through its intervention. The areas of welfare and treatment should be transferred to the protection and welfare-related legislation, and the areas that support or replace the role of parental care should be transferred to the civil law domain. The phrase “antisocial juveniles” does not fit the purpose clause of the Juvenile Act, which is responsible for a part of the realization of the idea of ​​juvenile protection. According to the current understanding of language, antisocial means antisocial personality disorder. Juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, and crime prone juveniles are not antisocial juveniles. Therefore, antisocial juveniles are not suitable as a superordinate concept encompassing the juveniles subject to the Juvenile Act. The phrase “antisocial juveniles” should be revised to a value-neutral, clear phrase that eliminates ambiguity and uncertainty so that anyone can understand its meaning. I believe that the elimination of such uncertainty could also lead to the abolition of the crime prone juvenile regulation.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 강봉수, "소년법개정에 있어서의 문제점 II", 청소년범죄연구, 5 (1987)
  2. 권석만, "현대 이상심리학" (2023), 학지사
  3. 김기두, "소년법상의 제반 문제점과 개정방향", 청소년범죄연구, 3 (1985)
  4. 김동림, "소년법의 문제점과 입법에 관한 논의", 형사정책, 12(1) (2000)
  5. 김두상, "소년법상 우범소년 규정의 개선과 우범소년에 대한 법교육에 관한 고찰", 경상대 법학연구, 25(3) (2017)
  6. 김영란, "개정 소년법에 대한 일고", 청소년범죄연구, 7 (1989)
  7. 김청송, "DSM의 변천사와 시대적 의미의 고찰", 한국심리학회지 : 건강, 21 (2016)
  8. 김하열, "헌법강의" (2024), 박영사
  9. 김 혁, "조기개입을 통한 소년비행의 예방: 우범소년과 불량행위소년에 대한 대응방안을 중심으로", 경찰학연구, 10(1) (2010)
  10. 박재윤, "소년법개정의 기본방향", 청소년범죄연구, 5 (1987)
  11. 이재영, "소년보호사건 처리절차에서의 몇 가지 문제점", 판례와 실무 (1997), 인천지방법원
  12. 배종대, "형법총론" (2024), 홍문사
  13. 소순무, "각국의 소년법제와 우리 제도의 개선방안, 가정법원사건의 제문제", 재판자료, 18 (1983), 법원행정처
  14. 오세혁, "법적 후견주의", 법철학연구, 12(1) (2009)
  15. 오영근, "소년법 : 조문해설서" (2021), 박영사
  16. 원혜욱, "소년사건에서의 보호이념과 국선보조인제도", 형사정책, (50) (2016)
  17. 윤용규, "우리나라 소년사법의 운용실태와 개선방안에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, (겨울) (2000)
  18. 시대변화에 따른 소년법 및 관련규정 개정방안 연구 : 목적과 대상을중심으로, "윤해성", 한국형사·법무정책연구원, ~ (2022)
  19. 이상돈, "형법강론" (2015), 박영사
  20. 이승현, "소년법에서의 우범소년 규정에 관한 비판적 고찰", 소년보호연구, 34(1) (2021)
  21. 이우경, "최신 이상심리학" (2021), 학지사
  22. 이준일, "헌법합치적 소년사법제도에 대한 구상", 헌법학연구, 28(3) (2022)
  23. 이진국, "소년보호대상의 범위에 관한 형사정책적 검토", 형사정책연구, 17(1) (2006)
  24. 임상규, "소년범죄의 합리적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (17) (2002)
  25. 장영민, "소년법상 제연령기준에 관한 일고찰", 이화여대 법학논집, 9(2) (2005)
  26. 정희철, "소년법 개정의 방향 : 국회 개정 법률안을 중심으로", 소년보호연구, 31(3) (2018)
  27. 정희철, "소년사법 개선 및 소년법 개정 논의의 쟁점과 평가", 보호관찰, 17(2) (2017)
  28. 제철웅, "국친사상의 변화와 소년법 보호처분절차의 개선방향", 비교사법, 29(4) (2022)
  29. 최병각, "보호소년사건의 범위와 처리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
  30. 최병각, "소년사법에서의 소년보호", 형사법연구, 19(3) (2007)
  31. 최종식, "소년법상 보호소년에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1996
  32. 최호진, "개정 소년법에 대한 주요내용과 비판적 검토", 단국대 법학논총, 31(2) (2008)
  33. 소년사건의 처리절차의 개선방안에 관한 연구, "한국형사정책연구원", ~ (1995)
  34. D. A. Andrews, "범죄심리학" (2017), 학지사
  35. Kring, "이상심리학" (2012), 시그마프레스
  36. V. Mark Durand, "이상심리학" (2017), 사회평론아카데미

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)