한국과 일본의 국민참여형 형사재판제도에 관한 연구
A Study on the System of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in Korea and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study it was considered that the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in Korea and that in Japan are similar in several respects, as those two systems - the System of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in which members of the general public will participate in the trial of a criminal case with judges in Japan - combine the jury system and the schöffengericht. Accordingly, the background of introduction of the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials, the similarity and difference in two countries' systems, and the assignments afterwards were reviewed. The criminal justice system of Korea and Japan is in a period of change as it strives to be appropriate for the 21st century It seems that both the system of Lay Participation during Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in Japan accept the jury system in the course of selecting juries and Saiban-in but the schöffengericht related to fact finding, application of laws and ordinances, and assessment of a case. the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in both Korea and Japan is very unique, and especially, the rights of juries in Korea are less authorized, so it is necessary to complement and enhance this system in many respects to develop this trial system. In general, as the jury system in USA is considered as the most organized one among the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials based on the principle of popular sovereignty, Thus, to analyze the system of Lay Participation during Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in Japan, and to carry out the related operation and revision afterwards, it is required to make efforts to get close to American jury system.
Abstract
In this study it was considered that the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in Korea and that in Japan are similar in several respects, as those two systems - the System of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in which members of the general public will participate in the trial of a criminal case with judges in Japan - combine the jury system and the schöffengericht. Accordingly, the background of introduction of the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials, the similarity and difference in two countries' systems, and the assignments afterwards were reviewed. The criminal justice system of Korea and Japan is in a period of change as it strives to be appropriate for the 21st century It seems that both the system of Lay Participation during Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in Japan accept the jury system in the course of selecting juries and Saiban-in but the schöffengericht related to fact finding, application of laws and ordinances, and assessment of a case. the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials in both Korea and Japan is very unique, and especially, the rights of juries in Korea are less authorized, so it is necessary to complement and enhance this system in many respects to develop this trial system. In general, as the jury system in USA is considered as the most organized one among the system of Public Participation in Criminal Trials based on the principle of popular sovereignty, Thus, to analyze the system of Lay Participation during Criminal Trials in Korea and the Saiban-in system in Japan, and to carry out the related operation and revision afterwards, it is required to make efforts to get close to American jury system.
참고문헌 (59)
- 국회도서관, "헌법제정회의록(제헌의회), 헌정사자료 제1집", ~ (1967)
- 공법연구회, "형사법과 헌법이념" (2006), 박영사
- 김성돈, "미국형사소송법" (1999), 길안사
- 신동운, "간추린 신형사소송법" (2007), 법문사
- 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2007), 박영사
- 박홍규, "사법의 민주화-재판을 재판한다" (1994), 개마고원
- 박홍규, "시민이 재판을" (2000), 사람 생각
- 하태영, "형사정책과 형사철학" (2007), 법문사
- Neil Vidmar, "세계의 배심제도(World Jury Systems, 2000)" (2007), 나남
- 법원행정처, "국민참여재판의 이해", ~ (2008)
- 권영설, "배심제?참심제의 도입논의와 그 헌법적합성의 문제", 법과 사회, (26) (2004)
- 김재원, "Common Law특징과 배심제도, 동아법학 제32호", ~ (2003)
- 김종철,, "사법에의 국민참여 검토해봐야", 시민과 변호사, (83) (2000)
- 문주영, "해방공간, 사법민주와논의의 전개와 좌절-배심제와 고위법관선출제를 중심으로-", 민주법학, (21) (2002), 민주주의법학연구회
- 박원순, "시민의 사법참여", 법과 사회, (18) (2000)
- 법무부, "미국사법제도, 법무자료 제239집", ~ (2001)
- 성선제, "미국의 배심제도, 미국헌법연구 제14호", ~ (2003)
- 민주사회를 위한 사법개혁-대통령자문위원회 보고서-, "사법개혁추진위원회", ~ (2000)
- 신우철, "국민의 형사재판참여에 관한 법률(안)에 대한 관견-비교헌법사적 시각에서의 쟁점분석과 대안모색", 법과 사회 (2006), 법과사회이론학회
- 심희기, "“‘1단계 국민사법참여제도’의 시론적 검토: 사개위 건의안의 지침분석과 주요쟁점”, 제1회 국민의 사법참여연구회, 사법제도개혁추진위원회 기획추진단", ~ (2005)
- 송기춘, "참심제도입여부와 실시에 관한 헌법학적 논의", 법과 사회 (2005), 법과사회이론학회
- 양건, "“국민의 사법참가”, 법조통권 제533호", ~ (2001)
- 임성기, "미국배심제도이 운용실태와 그 문제점", 해외연수검사연구논문집(Ⅱ), 17 (2002)
- 이주현, "독일참심제도 및 명예법관제도, 재판자료 제81집", ~ (1998)
- 이천현, "국민의 사법참여와 형사재판의 개선방안, 한국공안행정학회보, 제28호", ~ (2007)
- 오대성, "미국배심제도:심슨사건과 우드워드사건을 중심으로", 법학논총, (6) (2000), 조선대학교 법학연구소
- 윤영철, "사법개혁과 배심제", 민주법학, (25) (2005)
- 장석조, "사법개혁위원회. 한국공법학회 주체 ‘국민의 사법참여’공청회 토론문", ~
- 주한일, "미국배심제도의 특징 및 배심원의 선발에 관한 고찰, 재판자료 제85집", ~ (1999)
- 최창호, "배심제와 재판을 받을 권리에 관한 소고”, 형사법과 헌법이념, 공법연구회편", ~ (2006)
- 한상훈, "미국배심제에서 배심원선정절차", 저스티스 (2006)
- 한인섭, "배심재판과 형사절차의 변화와 전망", 법과 사회 (2003), 법과사회이론학회
- 한인섭, "국민참여재판 하에서 경찰역할의 변화", 형사정책, 18(2) (2006)
- 홍기태, "국민에 의한 재판-참심?배심의 가능성-토론문", 법과사회, (25) (2003), 법과 사회이론학회
- 황성기, "참심제와 배심제의 헌법적합성", 법과 사회 (2004), 법과사회이론학회
- 染野義信, "近代的轉換における裁判制度" (1988), 勁草書房
- 菊山正明, "明治國家の形成と司法制度" (1993), 御茶の水書房
- 三谷太一郞, "政治制度としての陪審制" (2001), 東京大學出版會
- 越溢弘, "裁判員制度と國民の司法參加" (2004), 現代人文社
- 小田中聰樹, "現代司法の構造と思想" (1973), 日本評論社
- 利谷信義, "戰後改革と 國民の司法參加”, 戰後改革4 司法改革(東京大學社會科學硏究所編), 東京, 東京大學出版會", ~ (1975)
- 浦?衛, "わが國にける陪審裁判の硏究-經驗談による實體調査を中心にして, 司法硏修所調査叢書 9", ~ (1968)
- 丸田隆, "裁判員制度" (2006), 平凡社新書
- 汁裕敎, "“法案提出に至る經緯と法案の槪要”, ジュリスト 1268", ~ (2004)
- 安村勉, "“裁判?の故意性”, ジュリスト 1268", ~ (2004)
- 法學協會, "註解日本國憲法" (1954), 有斐閣
- 宮宅俊義, "全訂日本國憲法" (1978), 日本評論社
- 淸宮四郞, "憲法Ⅰ" (1966), 有斐閣
- 小林直樹, "憲法講義下" (1981), 東京大學出版會
- 伊藤正巳, "憲法" (1982), 弘文堂
- 長谷部恭男, "憲法" (1996), 新世社
- 浦部法, "憲法學校室Ⅱ" (1996), 日本評論社
- 植原悅二郞, "デモクラシ-と日本の改造" (1919), 中外印刷工業
- 鈴木海四郞, "日本改造の意義及び綱領" (1919), 實生活者出版部
- 後藤昭, "實務家のための裁判員法入門" (2004), 現代人文社
- 池田 修, "解說 裁判員法" (2005), 弘文堂
- Alexander Hamilton, "The Federal PaPers" (1961), The New Aemerican Liberary
- Alexis De Tocquevielle, "De la Demokratie en America, 1835 2 vols.; ditions Gallimard", ~ (1961)
- William Burnham, "Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Unite States" (2002), West Group