우리나라 국민참여재판제도에 대한 평가
The Evaluation of Korea's Participatory Trial System
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea recently enacted "The Civil Participation in Criminal Trials Act" that allows citizens to participate in criminal trials as the jury. This new act aims to improve democratic justice and transparency in judicial procedures. Based on the American jury system in which the jury decide on one's guilt or innocence, The Korea's participatory trial system also introduced an element of the German ‘Schöffengericht’ in which the jury suggest the intensity of sentences to the judge. In this sense, the act can be called "the Korean-style trial by jury." First, this study investigates the effect of the enacted participatory trial system on the criminal judicial system. Second, this study evaluates the key contents of the participatory trial system such as the selection of the jury, civil participation, the validity and justice of verdicts, cases applied to the jury system, and the selection of the accused. Throughout these procedures, this study aims to find development plans for the participatory trial system.
Abstract
Korea recently enacted "The Civil Participation in Criminal Trials Act" that allows citizens to participate in criminal trials as the jury. This new act aims to improve democratic justice and transparency in judicial procedures. Based on the American jury system in which the jury decide on one's guilt or innocence, The Korea's participatory trial system also introduced an element of the German ‘Schöffengericht’ in which the jury suggest the intensity of sentences to the judge. In this sense, the act can be called "the Korean-style trial by jury." First, this study investigates the effect of the enacted participatory trial system on the criminal judicial system. Second, this study evaluates the key contents of the participatory trial system such as the selection of the jury, civil participation, the validity and justice of verdicts, cases applied to the jury system, and the selection of the accused. Throughout these procedures, this study aims to find development plans for the participatory trial system.
참고문헌 (23)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2003), 법문사
- 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2003), 박영사
- 대법원, "바람직한 형사사법시스템의 모색 자료집(Ⅰ)" (2004)
- 법원행정처, "국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률 해설" (2007)
- 사법개혁위원회, "사법개혁위원회자료집(Ⅰ)" (2004)
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2002), 법문사
- 안경환, "배심제와 시민의 사법참여" (2005), 집문당
- 이수정, "국민참여모의재판(2005년 8월 31일) 배심평의 내용분석" (2005), 사법제도개혁추진위원회
- 이수정, "중죄형사피고인과 변호인의 국민참여재판 선호도 연구" (2005), 사법제도개혁추진위원회
- 장영수, "기본권론" (2003), 홍문사
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2002), 박영사
- 홍성방, "헌법학" (2002), 현암사
- 곽병선, "형사소송의 주체와 배심제도", 비교형사법연구, 6(1) (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김한균, "참여재판에서 배심원에 대한 법관의 역할" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박경춘, "국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률의 성립과정과 문제점", 형사법의 신동향, (11) (2007), 대검찰청
- 방기태, "미국 형사소송절차상 배심제도의 역할과 그 문제점-주요사례를 중심으로-, 해외연수검사연구논문" (2006), 법무연수원
- 이재석, "배심제도의 이념과 문제점", 비교형사법연구, 3(1) (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
- 정재봉, "캐나다의 배심제 운영실태 및 배심제 도입과 관련된 문제점 고찰, in 해외연수검사연구논문집" (2006), 법무연수원
- 정진연, "국민참여재판에서 한국형 배심제의 도입", 법학논총, 15 (2006), 숭실대 법학연구소
- 최우정, "국민사법참여제도는 위헌적인 것인가?", 공법학연구, 6(1) (2005), 한국비교공법학회
- 한동훈, "미국형사사법상 주요제도의 실무운용에 대한 검토-우리 실무와의 비교를 중심으로-, 해외연수검사연구논문" (2006), 법무연수원
- 한상훈, "국민참여재판제도 시행과 인권옹호", 저스티스, (102) (2008), 한국법학원
- Arizona Supreme Court Committee, "Report on More Efficient Use of Juries, Jurors", The Power of 12 (1994)