본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Economic Assessment of Korea-EU FTA using a CGE Model with FDI

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This paper aims to quantify potential economic effects of the Korea‐EU FTA which became effective on 1 July 2011 using a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that explicitly takes into account foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign commercial presence differentiated by the country of location and ownership. To highlight the importance of FDI and foreign commercial presence, a comparison of the impacts of trade liberalization through tariff elimination and the impacts of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales is made. The impacts of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales on the Korean economy are predicted to be much bigger than those of trade liberalization through tariff elimination. Major findings of this paper are that Korea’s real GDP and welfare are to increase, as a result of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales, by 1.5 to 5.76 times and 1.2 to 2.89 times, respectively, as much as in the case of trade liberalization through tariff elimination. Therefore, it is required to take into account not only the effects of tariff elimination but also the effects of liberalization of barriers to FDI and activities of foreign affiliates for any FTA that Korea pursues so as to prevent an underestimation of its potential economic effects.

Abstract

This paper aims to quantify potential economic effects of the Korea‐EU FTA which became effective on 1 July 2011 using a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that explicitly takes into account foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign commercial presence differentiated by the country of location and ownership. To highlight the importance of FDI and foreign commercial presence, a comparison of the impacts of trade liberalization through tariff elimination and the impacts of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales is made. The impacts of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales on the Korean economy are predicted to be much bigger than those of trade liberalization through tariff elimination. Major findings of this paper are that Korea’s real GDP and welfare are to increase, as a result of liberalization of barriers to FDI and foreign affiliate sales, by 1.5 to 5.76 times and 1.2 to 2.89 times, respectively, as much as in the case of trade liberalization through tariff elimination. Therefore, it is required to take into account not only the effects of tariff elimination but also the effects of liberalization of barriers to FDI and activities of foreign affiliates for any FTA that Korea pursues so as to prevent an underestimation of its potential economic effects.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Armington, P.S, "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production", International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 16(1), pp.159~178 (1969)
  2. Beugelsdijk, S, "Why and How FDI Stocks are a Biased Measure of MNE Affiliate Activity", Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), pp.1444~1459 (2010)
  3. Bchir, M.H, "MIRAGE, a Computable General Equilibrium Model for Trade Policy Analysis" (2002), CEPII
  4. Brown, D, "Modelling Multilateral Liberalisation in Services", Asia‐Pacific Economic Review, 2, pp.21~34 (1996)
  5. Brown, D, "Measurement and Modeling of the Economic Effects of Trade and Investment Barriers in Services", Review of International Economics, 9(2), pp.262~286 (2001)
  6. A Global Database of Foreign Affiliate Sales, "Fukui, T", GTAP, ~, pp.GTAP Research Memorandum No. 24 (2012)
  7. A Foreign Direct Investment Database for Global CGE Models, "Gouel, C", CEPII, ~, pp.Working Paper No 2012‐08 (2012)
  8. The Structure of the FTAP Model, "Hanslow, K", Research Memorandum 5b of the Australian Productivity Commission, ~ (2000)
  9. Hertel, T.W, "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  10. Jesper Jensen, "Deep Trade Policy Options for Armenia: The Importance of Trade Facilitation, Services and Standards Liberalization", The Open‐Access, Open‐Assessment E‐Journal, 6, pp.1~55 (2012)
  11. Jensen, J, "The impact of liberalizing barriers to foreign direct investment in services: the case of Russian accession to the world trade organization", Review of Development Economics, 11(3), pp.482~506 (2007)
  12. OECD's Foreign Direct Investment Restrictiveness Index: 2010 Update, "Kalinova, B", OECD Working Papers on International Investment, ~ (2010)
  13. 김혁황, "Productivity Spillover Effect of Foreign Direct Investment into Korea", East Asian Economic Review, 14(2), pp.21~48 (2010), 대외경제정책연구원
  14. Ko, J.‐H, "Őkonomische Analyse von Energie‐ und Volkswirtschaft auf der Basis allgemeiner Gleichgewichtsmodelle, Europäische Hochschulschriften, Bd. 1420" (1993), Verlag Peter Lang
  15. 고종환, "A Korea-EU Free Trade Agreement and Analysis of its Economic Effects using a Dynamic CGE Model", 유럽연구, 26(3), pp.159~186 (2008), 한국유럽학회
  16. Lakatos, C, "Liberalization of FDI in Retail Services: a Fast Death Instrument for India", paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis (2012)
  17. Liberalization of Retail Services in India: a CGE Model, "Lakatos, C", .S. International Trade Commission, ~, pp.working paper No. 2013‐03A (2013)
  18. Latorre, M.C, "The impact of foreign‐owned companies on host economies: A computable general equilibrium approach" (2010), Nova Science Publishers
  19. Latorre M.C, "The effects of multinationals on host economies: A CGE approach", Economic Modelling, 26, pp.851~864 (2009)
  20. Latorre, "The role of Japanese multinationals’ affiliates in China: A dynamic CGE analysis of FDI between Japan and China", 16th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, GTAP, Shanghai, 12 ‐14 June 2013 (2013)
  21. Foreign Direct Investment in Applied General Equilibrium Models: Overview of the Literature. CPB Memorandum, "Lejour, A", CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, ~ (2006)
  22. Lejour, A.M, "WorldScan: a Model for International Economic Policy Analysis" (2006), CPB
  23. Markusen, J.R, "Multinational firms and the theory of international trade" (2002), MIT Press
  24. Incoporating International Capital Mobility into SALTER, "McDougall, R", Australia Industry Commissio, ~, pp.SALTER Working Paper No. 21 (1993)
  25. Narayanan, G, "Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 8 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis" (2012), Purdue University
  26. Petri, P.A, "Foreign Direct Investment in a Computable General Equilibrium Framework", paper prepared for the Conference, Making APEC work: Economic Challenges and Policy Alternatives, March 13‐14, Keio University, Tokyo (1997)
  27. World Investment Report 1996: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (1996)
  28. World Investment Report 2012: Towards a New Generation of Investment Policies, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (2012)
  29. World Investment Report 2013: Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)