중국공산당 지배질서와 정치발전: 구조, 자원, 엘리트를 중심으로
The CCP’s State Ruling Order and Political Development: Focus on the Structure, Resources and Elite
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China has sought and pursued various means of modernization since its entering the modern era launched by the Opium War. After coming into power, the Chinese Communist Party (“the CCP”) basically set its goal to be denial of, and overcoming the tradition while it establishes the Socialist ruling order; yet, the CCP has not excluded the possibility of simply modifying the tradition by means of Chinese acculturation of Socialism. This paper aims to analyze the CCP’s state ruling order, constructed after the founding of New China, separately in the aspect of the structure, of the resources, and of the elite, and aims eventually to grasp the characteristic and mechanism of the CCP’s state ruling order. Specifically, the Mao regime and the post-Mao regime are compared in the aspect of the ambivalence of Chinese modernization which includes both the denial and modification of the tradition. By then, the paper reveals and evaluates the change of the state ruling order caused by the two distinct regimes toward modernization. In context of the political development, the change of China’s state ruling order in the Mao era and the Reform and Open era can be summarized as follows; 1) the vagueness of boundaries in the governance system causes asymmetry and deadlock in the state-society relations; 2) the pluralization of governance resources fails to lead to the fundamental variance of the governance. causing a corrupt alliance of government and businesses, and possibly the unwanted stabilization of the ruling block and the widening of the scope of ruling; 3) in spite of pursuit of rationality in the governance system and the pluralization of governance resources, the CCP still hold the elite totalitarianism and for this use the inclusion and exclusion strategy; 4) the fearful history of divide of the nation and foreign invasions tend to motivate the CCP to insist on maintaining the unified political system.
Abstract
China has sought and pursued various means of modernization since its entering the modern era launched by the Opium War. After coming into power, the Chinese Communist Party (“the CCP”) basically set its goal to be denial of, and overcoming the tradition while it establishes the Socialist ruling order; yet, the CCP has not excluded the possibility of simply modifying the tradition by means of Chinese acculturation of Socialism. This paper aims to analyze the CCP’s state ruling order, constructed after the founding of New China, separately in the aspect of the structure, of the resources, and of the elite, and aims eventually to grasp the characteristic and mechanism of the CCP’s state ruling order. Specifically, the Mao regime and the post-Mao regime are compared in the aspect of the ambivalence of Chinese modernization which includes both the denial and modification of the tradition. By then, the paper reveals and evaluates the change of the state ruling order caused by the two distinct regimes toward modernization. In context of the political development, the change of China’s state ruling order in the Mao era and the Reform and Open era can be summarized as follows; 1) the vagueness of boundaries in the governance system causes asymmetry and deadlock in the state-society relations; 2) the pluralization of governance resources fails to lead to the fundamental variance of the governance. causing a corrupt alliance of government and businesses, and possibly the unwanted stabilization of the ruling block and the widening of the scope of ruling; 3) in spite of pursuit of rationality in the governance system and the pluralization of governance resources, the CCP still hold the elite totalitarianism and for this use the inclusion and exclusion strategy; 4) the fearful history of divide of the nation and foreign invasions tend to motivate the CCP to insist on maintaining the unified political system.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김도희, "중국에서의 시민사회 논의의 쟁점과 합의", 중소연구, 26(2), pp.45~59 (2002), 아태지역연구센터
- 윤상우, "'발전국가'를 준거로 한 중국 성장체제의 평가", 한국사회학, 39(2), pp.135~162 (2005), 한국사회학회
- 이희옥, "체제전환과 중국의 새로운 이데올로기 모색", 국제정치논총, 45(1), pp.201~225 (2005), 한국국제정치학회
- 전병곤, "중국 NGO의 성장과 정치발전", 중국학연구, (39), pp.261~285 (2007), 중국학연구회
- Andrew G. Walder, "Markets and Inequality in Transitional Economies: Toward Testable Theories", American Journal of Sociology, 101(4) (1996)
- Bian，Yanjie, "Market Transition and the Persistence of Power：The Changing Stratification System in Urban China", American Sociological Review, 61(5) (1996)
- Bian，Yanjie, "Chinese Social Stratification and Social Mobility", Annual Review of Sociology, 28 (2002)
- Cao Yang, "Comment：Controversies and Evidencein the Market Transition Debate", American Journal of Sociology, 105(4) (2000)
- Charles O. Hucker, "China, s Imperial Past – An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture" (1975), Stanford, Stanford Univ. Press
- Cheng Li, "China’s Learers – The New Generation" (2001), Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc
- David Easton, "Introduction: Democracy as a Regime Type and the Development of Political Science. In Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science" (1995), Ann Arbor, The Univ. of Michigan Press
- David Shambaugh, "China’s Communist Party - Atrophy and Adaptation" (2008), Washington DC & Berkeley: Woodrow Wilson Center Press & University of California Press
- Dorothy J. Solinger, "Labour Market Reform and the Plight of the Laid-off Proletariat", CQ, 170 (2002)
- J. P. Nettl, "The State as a Conceptual Variable", World Politics, 20 (1968)
- Marc J. Blecher, "Hegemony and Workers’ Politics in China", CQ, 170 (2002)
- Minxin Pei, "China’s Governance Crisis", Foreign Affairs, 81(5) (2002)
- Theda Skocpol, "Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. In Bringing the State Back In" (1985), London, Cambridge Univ. Press
- Timothy Brook, "Civil Society In China" (1997), New York, M. E. Sharpe, Inc
- Victor G. Nee, "The Emergence of a Market Society：Changing Mechanisms of Stratification in China", American Journal of Sociology, 101(4) (1996)
- Vivienne Shue, "The Reach of the State – Sketches of the Chinese Body Politics" (1988), Stanford, Stanford Univ. Press
- William L. Parish, "Politics and Markets: Dual Transformations", American Journal of Sociology, 101(4) (1996)
- Zhou，Xueguang, "Reply：Beyond the Debate and Toward Substantive Institutional Analysis", American Journal of Sociology, 105(4) (2000)
- "中國: 改革時代的政治發展與政治穩定"[URL]
- 瞿同祖, "中國封建社會" (2005), 上海, 人民出版社
- 孫立平, "转型与断裂" (2005), 北京, 淸华大学出版社
- 陈光金, "从精英循环到精英复制: 中国私营企业主阶层形成的主体机制的演变", 学习与探索, (1) (2005)
- "改革中的國家體制: 經濟奇迹和社會危機的同一根源"[URL]