중국식 민주와 공산당 체제의 공존
Chinese-Style Democracy and the Chinese Communist Party
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
In order to understand the limitation of political reform in Xi Jinping administration, I have compared Chinese-Style Democracy with Western Democracy and clarified the distinction. The reason that Chinese government criticizes Western liberal democracy, representing a multiparty system, a free election and separation of the three branches of government, and emphasizes ‘Chinese-Style Democracy’ is to justify one-party rule of the Communist Party. ‘Democracy within the Party’ is pushed forward with strategic intentions that the Communist Party solidifies its ruling foothold and expands its support base and ultimately ensures stability of Community system and justifies the Community system. In conclusion, ‘Chinese-Style Democracy’ and ‘Democracy within the Party’ is a strategy of the Communist Party’s long-term seizure of power that delays ‘liberal political democratization.’
Abstract
In order to understand the limitation of political reform in Xi Jinping administration, I have compared Chinese-Style Democracy with Western Democracy and clarified the distinction. The reason that Chinese government criticizes Western liberal democracy, representing a multiparty system, a free election and separation of the three branches of government, and emphasizes ‘Chinese-Style Democracy’ is to justify one-party rule of the Communist Party. ‘Democracy within the Party’ is pushed forward with strategic intentions that the Communist Party solidifies its ruling foothold and expands its support base and ultimately ensures stability of Community system and justifies the Community system. In conclusion, ‘Chinese-Style Democracy’ and ‘Democracy within the Party’ is a strategy of the Communist Party’s long-term seizure of power that delays ‘liberal political democratization.’
참고문헌 (33)
- 리롄장, "현대 중국의 위계적 정부 신뢰", 성균 차이나 브리프, 통권 : 27 (2013)
- 박민희, "해방구 만든 4인방... 민주선거 통해 관리 견제해야", 한겨레, ~ (2013)
- 성연철, "인터넷 강군 양성해 뉴미디어 장악하라", 한겨레, ~ (2013)
- 양한순, "우칸(乌坎)촌 농민시위를 통해 드러난 중국농촌의 토지문제", 동아시아 브리프, 통권 : 23 (2012)
- 유상철, "보시라이 재판의 승자는 중국 공산당", 중앙일보, ~ (2013)
- 이민자, "중국 민주화와 류샤오보(刘晓波)", 중소연구, 34(4), pp.37~65 (2011), 아태지역연구센터
- 이헌진, "NYT 시진핑, 개혁 기대와 달리 더 보수적", 동아일보, ~ (2013)
- 이민자, "중국의 민주주의는 어떻게 가능한가" (2013), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 자오쯔양, "국가의 죄수: 자오쯔양 중국공산당 총서기 최후의 비밀 회고록" (2010), 에버리치홀딩스
- 전성흥, "중국모델론" (2008), 부키
- 정재홍, "서구식 민주주의 틀어막는 중국", 중앙일보, ~ (2013)
- 조영남, "21세기 중국이 가는 길" (2009), 나남
- 조영남, "중국의 민주주의" (2011), 나남
- 지만수, "중국 개혁의 재시동", 성균 차이나 브리프, 통권 : 28 (2013)
- "广东省委副书记走访乌坎 村民挂“拥护共产党”横幅", 南方日报, ~ (2011)
- 王绍光, "反思現代民主制度", 社會科學報 (2010)
- "王绍光이 民主와 選主를 말하다", 東方早報, ~ (2009)
- "乌坎事件妥协未必不是民主", 天崖论坛, ~ (2011)
- "肩負起黨和人民的重托" (2007)[URL]
- "人民日報評乌坎事件: 基層政府沒正視村民合理", 人民日報, ~ (2011)
- 應松年, "走向法治政府: 依法行政理論硏究與實證調査" (2001), 法律出版社
- 张铁, "人民时评：“乌坎转机”提示我们什么", 人民日报, ~ (2011)
- 張良, "中國‘六四’眞相 (下)" (2001), 明淨出版社
- "中國重申不搞西方民主. 堅持走自己的政治文明道路" (2011)[URL]
- "天涯时空 由乌坎事件想到的中国改革之路", 天涯论坛, ~ (2011)
- Dittmer, Lowell, "China’s Deep Reform: Domestic Politics in Transition" (2006), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
- Lieberthal, Kenneth, "Governing China: From Revolution though Reform" (1995), W. W. Norton & Company
- Naughton, Barry J., "Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- O’Brien, Kevin J., "Rightful Resistance in Rural China" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Obama, Barack, "On an New Beginning", remarks at Cairo University, ~ (2009)
- Tsai, Kellee S, "Capitalism without Democracy: The Private Sector in Contemporary China" (2007), Cornell University Press
- Yang, Dali L, "Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China" (2004), Stanford University Press
- Zhao, Shisheng, "The China Model: can it replace the Western model of modernization", Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65) (2010)