『三國志演義』의 문학적 위상의 轉變 - 조선 전래 이후 근대에 이르기까지 그 문학적 위상의 전변에 관하여
The Change and the Revaluation of The Literary Status for Samgukji Yeonui focused on from the Joseon Dynasty to modern times
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Samgukji Yeonui(三國志演義, The Romance Of Three Kingdoms), arguably the most widely read in Korea and acclaimed as one of the Four Great Classical Novels of Chinese literature, is a originally historical novel based on the events in the turbulent years near the end of the Han Dynasty and the Three Kingdoms era of Chinese history(169-280 AD). There has been various arguments about Samgukji Yeonui many sinologists have built much over the centuries. The goal of this paper is to investigate the change and the transition of the literary status for it since being introduced into the Joseon Dynasty period. The research is ongoing as in the following. Samgukji Yeonui is well recognized with its popularity and the academic value nowadays. It also might be said its statue is a great distinction in the history of Korean literature. Someone’s views on Samgukji Yeonui that it outstrips merely the category of foreign literatures or translated literatures have been easily encountered. So it looks while that may conjure up images of being held in high esteem at the first glance, but that’s not the real story. Its literary status has been largely historically circumstantial and variable. There have been mixed evaluations about Samgukji Yeonui . Sometimes canon; other times negative or anti-canon. Samgukji Yeonui, as a stereotype of popular novel and a main argument in the discussion on the effective value of ‘novels’, was publicly criticized in the Joseon Dynasty. When introduced for the first time in 16C, on the one hand, it was a sensational novel, on the other hand, it was criticized for the reason of its historical approach to the official history. Becoming more and more popular in 17-18C, there came widespread criticism because simple fad would have so much impact over literary style. King JeongjoJ(正祖) executed restoration literary style to convert an indulgence in reading Samgukji Yeonui. Though the novel was gradually accepted, this situation continued over 19c, and it was still defined as a ground breaking for nothing(架虛鑿空). According to ‘Samgukji Yeonui syndrom’ with publishing in book form and serial story in a newspaper, rapidly changing situation came out in modern times, but not knowing why it did. Samgukji Yeonui, one of the most popular novels and also a creation motiv for classic novels, such as heroic tales, Chinese classics novels, and a kind of anthropomorphized novels, also gained academic recognition. In this paper the investigative inquiry is done through the survey for the literary traits on Samgukji Yeonui in Korea from the Joseon Dynasty to modern times. It’s an attempt to have thrown new light on the various range of the literary statues covers from canon to miscellaneous works.
Abstract
Samgukji Yeonui(三國志演義, The Romance Of Three Kingdoms), arguably the most widely read in Korea and acclaimed as one of the Four Great Classical Novels of Chinese literature, is a originally historical novel based on the events in the turbulent years near the end of the Han Dynasty and the Three Kingdoms era of Chinese history(169-280 AD). There has been various arguments about Samgukji Yeonui many sinologists have built much over the centuries. The goal of this paper is to investigate the change and the transition of the literary status for it since being introduced into the Joseon Dynasty period. The research is ongoing as in the following. Samgukji Yeonui is well recognized with its popularity and the academic value nowadays. It also might be said its statue is a great distinction in the history of Korean literature. Someone’s views on Samgukji Yeonui that it outstrips merely the category of foreign literatures or translated literatures have been easily encountered. So it looks while that may conjure up images of being held in high esteem at the first glance, but that’s not the real story. Its literary status has been largely historically circumstantial and variable. There have been mixed evaluations about Samgukji Yeonui . Sometimes canon; other times negative or anti-canon. Samgukji Yeonui, as a stereotype of popular novel and a main argument in the discussion on the effective value of ‘novels’, was publicly criticized in the Joseon Dynasty. When introduced for the first time in 16C, on the one hand, it was a sensational novel, on the other hand, it was criticized for the reason of its historical approach to the official history. Becoming more and more popular in 17-18C, there came widespread criticism because simple fad would have so much impact over literary style. King JeongjoJ(正祖) executed restoration literary style to convert an indulgence in reading Samgukji Yeonui. Though the novel was gradually accepted, this situation continued over 19c, and it was still defined as a ground breaking for nothing(架虛鑿空). According to ‘Samgukji Yeonui syndrom’ with publishing in book form and serial story in a newspaper, rapidly changing situation came out in modern times, but not knowing why it did. Samgukji Yeonui, one of the most popular novels and also a creation motiv for classic novels, such as heroic tales, Chinese classics novels, and a kind of anthropomorphized novels, also gained academic recognition. In this paper the investigative inquiry is done through the survey for the literary traits on Samgukji Yeonui in Korea from the Joseon Dynasty to modern times. It’s an attempt to have thrown new light on the various range of the literary statues covers from canon to miscellaneous works.
참고문헌 (35)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- 심경호, "서포만필(하)" (2010), 문학동네
- 이우준, "몽유야담" (1994), 寶庫社
- "每日申報", ~
- "朝鮮日報", ~
- 양백화, "양백화 문집 1~3" (1995), 강원대학교 출판부
- 신경숙, "교양필독서 100선" (2007), 경희대학교 출판부
- 김경미, "조선 후기 소설의 성행과 소설관의 변화, In 소설의 매혹-조선후기 소설비평과 소설론-" (2003), 월인
- 김종회, "해방전후 박태원의 역사소설, In 박태원과 역사소설" (2008), 깊은샘
- 김태준, "증보 조선소설사" (1990), 한길사
- 인하대학교 한국학연구소 기초학문연구단, "삼국지 한국어역본과 서사변용 연구, In 《삼국지연의》 한국어번역과 서사변용" (2007), 인하대출판부
- 서대석, "군담소설과 삼국지연의, In 군담소설의 구조와 배경" (1984), 이화여대출판부
- 이주영, "舊活字本 古典小說硏究" (1998), 월인
- 장효현, "18세기 소설의 발달과 文體反正, In 韓國古典小說史硏究" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
- 정원기, "최근 삼국지연의 연구동향" (2000), 중문
- David Rolston, "마오씨(毛氏) 부자, 리위(李漁), 그리고 『삼국연의』, In 중국 고대소설과 소설 평점" (2009), 소명출판
- 윤일환, "번역, 권력, 전복" (2008), 동인출판사
- 丸山眞男, "번역과 일본의 근대(飜譯と日本の近代)" (2000), 이산
- 고규진, "문화적 기억과 문학정전-그리스의 문자문화와 호머의 정전화 과정을 중심으로-", 독일언어문학, (22), pp.237~257 (2003), 한국독일언어문학회
- 고규진, "다문화시대의 문학 정전(正典)", 독일언어문학, (23), pp.83~99 (2004), 한국독일언어문학회
- 김도환, "『三國志演義』의 舊活字本 古典小說로의 改作 樣相", 중국소설논총, (20), pp.193~217 (2004), 한국중국소설학회
- 김용찬, "조선후기 시조에 나타난 소설수용의 양상-《삼국지연의》를 중심으로-", 어문논집, (32) (1993), 민족어문학회
- 민관동, "中國古典小說의 國內 流入 時期와 科程 및 板本에 대한 考察", 中國小說論叢, (4) (1994), 韓國中國小說學會
- 민관동, "中國古典小說의 受容과 變容에 대한 考察", 중국문학연구, (36), pp.99~124 (2008), 한국중문학회
- 朴在淵, "朝鮮時代 中國 通俗小說 飜譯本의 연구 : 樂善齋本을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1993
- 박재연, "양백화의 중국문학 번역 작품에 대한 재평가", 중국학연구, (4) (1998), 중국학연구회
- 박재연, "조선각본 ≪新刊古本大字音釋三國志傳通俗演義≫에 대하여", 중국어문학지, (27), pp.171~211 (2008), 중국어문학회
- 박재연, "새로 발굴된 朝鮮 活字本≪三國志通俗演義≫에 대하여", 중국어문논총, (44), pp.241~262 (2010), 중국어문연구회
- 박일용, "조선후기 소설론의 전개", 국어국문학, (94) (1985), 국어국문학회
- 서경희, "〈옥선몽〉연구 : 19세기 소설의 정체성과 소설론의 향방", 박사, pp.2004
- 이경선, "한국 군담소설 및 구운몽·옥루몽과 삼국지연의의 비교, In 淵坡車相轅博士頌壽論文集" (1971), 淵坡車相轅博士頌壽論文集刊行委員會
- 이문규, "19세기 소설비평의 한 양상-<三韓拾遺>에 대한 유학자들의 논의를 중심으로-", 인문과학, (4) (1997), 서울시립대인문과학연구소
- 정규복, "한국군담소설류의 제문제", 국어국문학, 34 (1967), 국어국문학회
- 정인모, "정전화와 탈정전화", 독어교육, 43(43), pp.275~300 (2008), 한국독어독문학교육학회
- 홍성남, "『夢遊野談』 異本 硏究", 한국어문학연구, (45) (2005), 한국어문학연구학회
