간접증거성과 인식양상: 기능변이의 문제를 중심으로
Indirect Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: With Reference to Functional Variation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this work is to explain categorial correlations between indirect evidentiality and epistemic modality on the basis of semantic, pragmatic usages of Russian so-called non-specialized lexical markers of evidentiality, such as kazhetsja, naverno, vidimo, poxozhe, dolzhno byt' etc. To do this, firstly I concentrated on the parameter of internal functional variation of a given parenthetic word. Secondly, I approached this topic from a typological perspective. Thirdly, I accepted Sweeter(1990)'s methodological assumption that etymological prototype of a given word plays a great role in grammatical, semantic,pragmatic changes. As a result, I could postulate general tendencies of grammaticalizations (or semantic, pragmatic, funtional changes) in the direction from epistemic modality to indirect evidentialty, which consists of inferentives, presumptives, and quotatives. For example, such a parenthetic word as kazhetsja can functions not only as a marker of epistemic modality of uncertainty, but also as inferentives. Besides,it is very interesting that this word lately has started to function as quotatives,too. This kind of functional variations are very characteristic in these spheres.
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to explain categorial correlations between indirect evidentiality and epistemic modality on the basis of semantic, pragmatic usages of Russian so-called non-specialized lexical markers of evidentiality, such as kazhetsja, naverno, vidimo, poxozhe, dolzhno byt' etc. To do this, firstly I concentrated on the parameter of internal functional variation of a given parenthetic word. Secondly, I approached this topic from a typological perspective. Thirdly, I accepted Sweeter(1990)'s methodological assumption that etymological prototype of a given word plays a great role in grammatical, semantic,pragmatic changes. As a result, I could postulate general tendencies of grammaticalizations (or semantic, pragmatic, funtional changes) in the direction from epistemic modality to indirect evidentialty, which consists of inferentives, presumptives, and quotatives. For example, such a parenthetic word as kazhetsja can functions not only as a marker of epistemic modality of uncertainty, but also as inferentives. Besides,it is very interesting that this word lately has started to function as quotatives,too. This kind of functional variations are very characteristic in these spheres.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김군선, "중급러시아어·문법의 심화와 고급문장의 독해 上" (2004), 범한서적주식회사
- 홍택규, "증거성과 동사범주의 주관화", 러시아어문학연구논집, 28(28), pp.155~190 (2008), 한국러시아문학회
- 홍택규, "인용증거성과 ‘타자의 말’: мол, де, дескать. грит 등의 어휘적 표지를 중심으로", 노어노문학, 21(1), pp.73~105 (2009), 한국노어노문학회
- 홍택규, "‘구세계 증거성 벨트’와 발칸언어연합 : 연구를 위한 시론", 노어노문학, 22(4), pp.189~217 (2010), 한국노어노문학회
- БУЛЫГИНА, Т. В., "Модальность, In Человеческий фактор в языке. Коммуникация, модальность", pp.110~153 (1992), Наука
- БУЛЫГИНА, Т. В., "Гипотеза как мыслительный и речевой акт, In Логический анализ языка", pp.78~82 (1993), Наука
- ВАРЛАМОВА, М. П., "Показатели эвиденциальности в английском тексте", pp.200~203 (1999), Текст как объект изучения и обучения, Псков
- ИВАНОВ, Д., "Одна категория или две?: Эвиденциальность и эпистемическая модальность" (2000), Диалог
- КОЗИНЦЕВА, Н. А., "Категория эвиденциальности (проблемы типологического анализа)", Вопросы языкознания, 3, pp.92~104 (1994)
- МЕЛЬЧУК, И. А., "Курс общей морфологии. Т. II, М.", ~ (1998)
- НИЦОЛОВА, Р., "Семантическая гиперкатегория ‘Характеристика говорящим сообщаемой информации’ и её связь с временем и лицом глагола" (2003), Грамматические категории: иерархии, связи, взаимодействие. Материалы международной научной конференции. СПб.
- ПЛУНГЯН, В. А., "ХАНЗЕН, Бьёрн “Эвиденциальность в немецком языке”, Эвиденциальность в языках Европы и Азии, Наука", 241~252 (2007)
- ХОНГ, Т.-Г., "К вопросу о значении корейского глагольного суффикса -te-", Исследования по теории грамматики, 3 (2004)
- ХРАКОВСКИЙ, В. С., "Эвиденциальность, эпистемическая модальность, (ад)миративность" (2007), Эвиденциальность в языках Европы и Азии, Наука
- ЯКОВЛЕВА, Е. С., "Согласование модусных характеристик высказывания" (1988), Прагматика и проблемы интенсиональности. М.
- ЯКОВЛЕВА, Е. С., "Фрагменты русской языковой картины мира (модели пространства, времени и восприятия) М.: <Язык. Семиотика. Культура>", ~ (1994)
- FRIEDMAN, V. A., "Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian and Albanian", pp.168~187 (1986), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology
- FRIEDMAN, V. A., "Turkish in Macedonia and Beyond. Studies in Contact, Typology and other Phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus" (2003), Harrassowitz Verlag
- GIVON, T., "Evidentialty and Epistemic Space", Studies in Language, 6(1) (1982)
- HAAN de F., "Encoding Speaker Perspective: Evidentials" (2005), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories
- JAKOBSON, R., "Shifters, Verbal Catergories, and the Russian Verb, In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings. Vol. 2. Word and Language", pp.130~147 (1971), The Hague
- KEHAYOV P., "Typology of Grammaticalized Evidentiality in Bulgarian and Estonian", Linguistica Uralica, 38(2), pp.126~144 (2002)
- PLUNGIAN, V., "The Place of Evidentiality within Universal Grammatic Space", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.349~357 (2001)
- SWEETSER, E., "From Etymology to Pragmatics" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- TRAUGOTT, E. C., "Subjectification in Grammaticalisation, In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives" (1995), Cambridge University Press