러시아어 인지동사의 담화화용적 기능
An Analysis of the Discourse Pragmatic Functions of Cognitive Verbs in Russian
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we examine various functions of Russian cognitive verbs “znat’” and “ponimat’” in the Russian spoken language through conversation analysis and context analysis. Cognitive verbs are the type of verbs that include the meanings of accepting, understanding, and judging information about an object. However, in the dialogic discourse, “znaesh’”(second person singular, present tense of “znat’”), “znaete”(second person plural, present tense of “znat’”), “ponimaesh’”((second person singular, present tense of “ponimat’”) and “ponimaete”(second person plural, present tense of “ponimat’”) are used as various discourse pragmatical markers depending on situations, its position in the sentence. The pragmatical discourse functions of the cognitive verbs “znat’” and “ponimat’” are newly acquired in the process of the desemanticization through grammaticalization. The main functions of Russian cognitive verbs in the colloquial dialogue are the function of topicalization marker and discourse markers. The topicalization marker is used in the introduction of a topic and is used to signal the beginning or to attempt to switch between topics, and cognitive verbs as discourse markers perform the function of a correction marker for mistakes when there is a need for the speaker to supplement the insufficiency of information in their utterance in the process of dialogue. And the cognitive verbs have a function of hesitation filler that is used to take time to recall some forgotten words. Finally, it is analyzed that the cognitive verbs at the end of sentence perform the function of the mitigation markers as speaker's politeness strategy. In the last chapter we schematize the characteristics in the preceding and following utterances, based on the discourse pragmatical functions of cognitive verbs. It can be a useful resource for Korean Russian learners to provide practical help in conversation and translation.
Abstract
In this study, we examine various functions of Russian cognitive verbs “znat’” and “ponimat’” in the Russian spoken language through conversation analysis and context analysis. Cognitive verbs are the type of verbs that include the meanings of accepting, understanding, and judging information about an object. However, in the dialogic discourse, “znaesh’”(second person singular, present tense of “znat’”), “znaete”(second person plural, present tense of “znat’”), “ponimaesh’”((second person singular, present tense of “ponimat’”) and “ponimaete”(second person plural, present tense of “ponimat’”) are used as various discourse pragmatical markers depending on situations, its position in the sentence. The pragmatical discourse functions of the cognitive verbs “znat’” and “ponimat’” are newly acquired in the process of the desemanticization through grammaticalization. The main functions of Russian cognitive verbs in the colloquial dialogue are the function of topicalization marker and discourse markers. The topicalization marker is used in the introduction of a topic and is used to signal the beginning or to attempt to switch between topics, and cognitive verbs as discourse markers perform the function of a correction marker for mistakes when there is a need for the speaker to supplement the insufficiency of information in their utterance in the process of dialogue. And the cognitive verbs have a function of hesitation filler that is used to take time to recall some forgotten words. Finally, it is analyzed that the cognitive verbs at the end of sentence perform the function of the mitigation markers as speaker's politeness strategy. In the last chapter we schematize the characteristics in the preceding and following utterances, based on the discourse pragmatical functions of cognitive verbs. It can be a useful resource for Korean Russian learners to provide practical help in conversation and translation.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김진수, "담화불변화사 you know와 why의 의미 분석", 언어연구, 6, pp.79~100 (2002)
- 변정민, "우리말의 인지표현" (2005), 월인출판사
- 송경숙, "담화화용론" (2002), 한국문화사
- 이원표, "담화분석: 방법론과 화용 및 사회언어학적 연구의 실례" (2001), 한국문화사
- 이희숙, "러시아어의 дать'to give'와 주다의 문법화 현상", 언어학, 16(2), pp.255~271 (2008), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 양영하, "구어담화에 나타난 ‘쉼’의 기능", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.79~100 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 정연우, "러시아어 동사 시제 체계의 문법화", 언어과학연구, 35, pp.214~258 (2005), 언어과학회
- 정정원, "러시아어 인지 동사 думать와 считать의 비교 연구- 주어와 화자의 상관 관계 -", 슬라브학보, 21(2), pp.77~95 (2006), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- 정희자, "담화와 문법 그리고 의미" (2009), 한국문화사
- 김해연, "You Know as a Stance Marker of Engagement", 담화와 인지, 23(1), pp.29~55 (2016), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Seongha Rhee, "Grammaticalization of verbs of cognition and perception", 현대문법연구, 24, pp.111~135 (2001)
- Brown, G., "Discourse Analysis" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff R., "Hedges A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts", Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, pp.183~228 (1972)
- Maynard S., "Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of the Japanese emotional adverb doose", Pragmatics, 1(3), pp.371~392 (1991)
- Sacks H., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
- Schiffrin D., "Approaches to discourse" (1994), B. Blackwell
- Sweetser E. E., "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Östman J. O., "'You know' A Discourse-Functional Approach" (1981), Pragmatics & Beyond
- Большой толковый словарь русского языка, "Сост. и гл" (1998), Норинт
- Ожегов С.И., "Словарь русского языка: Ок. 57000 слов" (1986), Русский язык
- "Словарь русского языка: В 4-х т. Т. 4", Русский язык
- ред. Ушакова, "Толковый словарь русского языка В 4-х т" (1940), Гос. изд-во иностранных и национальных словарей
- "Словарь современного русского литературного языка В 17-ти т" (1963), Наука
- Аристов С. А., "Лингвистический вестник: сб. науч. тр., Ижевск. Вып. 1", pp.5~10 (1999)
- Артемьева Ю. В., "Тверской лингвистический меридиан: сб. науч. тр., Твер. гос. ун-т., Вып. 3", pp.20~27 (1999)
- Арутюнова Н. Д., "Типы языковых значений. Оценка, событие, факт" (1983), Наука
- Валгина Н. С., "Теория текста: учеб" (2003), Логос
- Галактионова И. В., "Идеографические аспекты русской грамматики", pp.145~168 (1988)
- Земская Е. А., "Русская разговорная речь" (1983), Наука
- Киселева К.Л., "Дискурсивные слова русского языка: опыт контекстно-семантического описания" (1998), Метатекст
- Кобозева И.М., "Семантика глагола понимать: от пропозиционального отношения к межличностному", Сбор. Компьютерная лингвистикаи интеллектуальные техно огии. По материалам Междунардной конференции “Диалог” 2009, 2009(8), pp.176~180 (2009)
- Кокошкина И. В., "Десемантизированные элементы дискурса:функционирование, классификация, факторы употребления" (2011), Дисс. канд. наук
- Ладыженская Б.Я., "Особенности организации устной спонтанной речи(вставные элементы в речевом потоке)" (1984), Автореф. дис. канд. филол. наук
- Луценко Н. А., "Русская речь № 1", pp.99~103 (1984), Наука
- Николаева Т.М., "Функции частиц в высказывании (на материале славянских языков)" (1985), Наука
- Пайар Д., "Дискурсивные слова русского языка: контекстовое варьирование и семантическое единство" (2003), Азбуковник
- Утехин Н.В., "ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. Труды Института лингвистических исследований РАН", pp.81~95 (2013), Наука