趋向动词‘들다/나다’与‘进/出’语义功能对比分析
Comparative Analysis of grab/let go and jin/chu Action Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates most frequently utilized Korean action verbs ‘grab/let go’ and their Chinese counterparts ‘jin/chu’ with technical analyses according to definitions in the dictionary. The action verbs ‘grab/let go’ and ‘jin/chu’ were analyzed in four terms entity, subject, time, and abstraction. First, in contextual definition, these action verbs have similarities in meanings such as ‘entry/exit’, ‘arrival’, ‘inclusion’, ‘enlist’, ‘expression’, ‘production’, but again not in complete correspondence. The verbs contrasted in that ‘grab/let go’ had association in ‘move in/out’, ‘pregnancy/birth, ‘satisfaction/dissatisfaction’, ‘marriage,’ ‘service’, ‘inclusion’, ‘completion’, ‘development’, ‘appearance’, ‘start’, ‘elapse’, ‘generation’, ‘increase’, and ‘deduction’ while ‘jin/chu’ had association in ‘progress’, ‘accept’, ‘publication’, and ‘excess’. In contextual meaning, the Korean action verbs had more expansive definitions.
Abstract
This study investigates most frequently utilized Korean action verbs ‘grab/let go’ and their Chinese counterparts ‘jin/chu’ with technical analyses according to definitions in the dictionary. The action verbs ‘grab/let go’ and ‘jin/chu’ were analyzed in four terms entity, subject, time, and abstraction. First, in contextual definition, these action verbs have similarities in meanings such as ‘entry/exit’, ‘arrival’, ‘inclusion’, ‘enlist’, ‘expression’, ‘production’, but again not in complete correspondence. The verbs contrasted in that ‘grab/let go’ had association in ‘move in/out’, ‘pregnancy/birth, ‘satisfaction/dissatisfaction’, ‘marriage,’ ‘service’, ‘inclusion’, ‘completion’, ‘development’, ‘appearance’, ‘start’, ‘elapse’, ‘generation’, ‘increase’, and ‘deduction’ while ‘jin/chu’ had association in ‘progress’, ‘accept’, ‘publication’, and ‘excess’. In contextual meaning, the Korean action verbs had more expansive definitions.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "표준 국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 국립국어연구원
- 박선옥, "국어 보조동사의 통사와 의미 연구" (2005), 역락
- 배도용, "우리말 의미 확장 연구" (2002), 한국문화사
- 손세모돌, "국어보조용언 연구" (1996), 한국문화사
- 한글학회, "우리말 큰 사전" (1991), 어문각
- 허용, "대조언어학" (2013), 소통
- 홍사만, "한, 일어 대조분석" (2002), 도서출판 역락
- 송국명, "한국어 '들다'와 중국어 대응 표현 대비 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 유미영, "이동동사에 대하여: ‘나다’ ‘들다’의 의미분석 연구", 목원국어국문학, (1) (1990), 목원대학교
- 육미란, "이동동사 '가다'의 의미 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2008
- 이남, "한·중 방향성 이동동사 구성의 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 임지룡, "다의어의 인지적 의미 특성", 언어학, (18), pp.229~261 (1996), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 임지룡, "주관적 이동표현의 인지적 의미 특성", 담화와 인지, 5(2) (1998), 담화인지학회
- 趙鏞辛, "우리말 동사 '들다'의 다의성에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1988
- 홍달오, "動詞 ‘들다", 나다’의 意味에 대한 認知言語學的 考察, 2010, pp.38(1), 131~153[DOI]
- 홍달오, "‘가다, 오다, 들다, 나다’의 의미 합성에 관한 인지의미론적 고찰", 어문론집, 55, pp.63~90 (2013), 중앙어문학회
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 邢福义, "汉语语法三百句" (2002), 商务印书馆
- 董志翘, "再论‘进’对‘入’的历时替换—与李宗江先生商榷", 中国语文, (2) (1998)
- 孙斐, "九十年代以来的趋向动词研究述评", 柳州职业技术学院学报, (01) (2004)
- 黄月华, "汉语趋向动词的多义研究", 博士, pp.2011
- 孟琮, "句型和动词" (1987), 语文出版社
- 李宗江, "‘进’对‘入’的历时替换", 中国语文, (3) (1997)
- 刘芳, "几组趋向动词演变研究", 博士, pp.2009
- 刘月华, "语法研究和探索 01期" (1988), 北京大学出版社
- 卢英顺, "‘进’类趋向动词的句法, 语义特点探析", 语言教学与研究, (01) (2007)