중국 개정 형사소송법에서의 간이절차 연구
On study of Summary procedure in China Criminal Procedure Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Summary criminal procedure is designed to achieve the idea of discoveries of truth and guarantee of human rights, realizing a fair trial and making an efficient use of judicial resources. China Criminal Procedure Law amended in 2012 has shown a big improvement upon the way to efficiently shape in this respect, which includes changes in applicable summary criminal procedure, application conditions, trial organization. Specifically, the amended act provides that the accused have the right to consent to a commencement of summary criminal procedure, which legislatively refined identified problems. However, building up efficiency in criminal procedures and value of a speedy trail in China can be a daunting prospect in spite of improvement mentioned above. The institutional framework, where procedures with strict examination should apply to cases that severe trial and stern judgment is required for and a decision on minor offenses should made in a direction to minimalize the growth of spending and promptly conclude a case, is necessary. This paper evaluates legal implication through the consideration of summary criminal procedure in the amended China Criminal Procedure Law and suggests ways for further improvement.
Abstract
Summary criminal procedure is designed to achieve the idea of discoveries of truth and guarantee of human rights, realizing a fair trial and making an efficient use of judicial resources. China Criminal Procedure Law amended in 2012 has shown a big improvement upon the way to efficiently shape in this respect, which includes changes in applicable summary criminal procedure, application conditions, trial organization. Specifically, the amended act provides that the accused have the right to consent to a commencement of summary criminal procedure, which legislatively refined identified problems. However, building up efficiency in criminal procedures and value of a speedy trail in China can be a daunting prospect in spite of improvement mentioned above. The institutional framework, where procedures with strict examination should apply to cases that severe trial and stern judgment is required for and a decision on minor offenses should made in a direction to minimalize the growth of spending and promptly conclude a case, is necessary. This paper evaluates legal implication through the consideration of summary criminal procedure in the amended China Criminal Procedure Law and suggests ways for further improvement.
참고문헌 (32)
- 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제4판" (2012), 법문사
- 신양균, "신판 형사소송법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 이재상, "신형사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 임동규, "형사소송법" (2011), 법문사
- 표성수, "개정 형사소송법 해설" (2007), 국민대학교 출판부
- 박종근, "중국형사소송법의 발전과 향후의 과제", 법학연구, 37, pp.107~141 (2012), 부설법학연구소
- 간이형사재판제도의 효율화 방안, "황태정", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 陈光中, "中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法（修改条文释义与点评）" (2012), 人民法院出版社
- 陈光中, "刑事诉讼法学" (1996), 中国政法大学出版社
- 陈瑞华, "刑事审判原理论" (1997), 北京大学出版社
- 季卫东, "法律程序的意义对中国法制建设的另一种思考" (2004), 中国法制出版社
- 林鈺雄, "刑事訴訟法" (2005), 中國人民大學出版社
- 左卫民, "简易刑事程序研究" (2005), 法律出版社
- 陈光中, "刑事诉讼法制建设的重大进步", 清华法学, 6(3) (2012)
- "刑诉法修订：人权保障力度大于公权力扩张"[URL]
- 陈光中, "追求刑事诉讼价值的平衡—英俄近年刑事司法改革述评", 中国刑事法杂志, (1) (2003)
- "新刑事诉讼法视野下的简易程序机制探索——从海宁市人民检察院《办法》谈起"[URL]
- 陈瑞华, "中国刑事司法制度的三个传统", 东方法学, (1) (2008)
- 陈卫东, "正当程序的简易化和简易程序的正当化", 法学研究, (2) (1998)
- 雷小政, "比较与借鉴：刑事诉讼价值权衡的方法论基础", 法律科学, (1) (2009)
- 刘根菊, "确立我国式辩诉交易之研讨", 政法论坛 (2000)
- 李静, "刑事简易程序多样化探析", 河北理工大学学报（社科版） (2003)
- 李洪江, "刑事和解应该缓行", 中国检察官, (5) (2006)
- 李奋飞, "刑事和解制度的中国式构建", 中国检察官, (5) (2006)
- 林劲松, "论刑事程序合法性的证明", 中国刑事法杂志, (1) (2013)
- 樊崇义, "我国刑事诉讼制度的进步与发展——2012 年刑事诉讼法修正案评介", 中国政法大学学报, (2)통권 : 34 (2013)
- 谭世贵, "刑事简易程序的多元化建构", 浙江工商大学学报, (1)통권 : 112 (2012)
- 汪建成, "刑事审判程序的重大变革及其展开", 法学家, (3) (2012)
- 宋英辉, "我国刑事简易程序的重大改革", 中国刑事法杂志, (7) (2012)
- 宋英辉, "我国刑事和解实证分析", 中国法学, (5) (2008)
- 左卫民, "进步抑或倒退：刑事诉讼法修改草案述评", 清华法学, 6(1) (2012)