자동차보험진료수가 심사위탁에 관한 소고 -자배법 제12조의 2를 중심으로-
A Study on Medical Charge Assessment Contract for Auto Insurance - Focused on Clause 2, Article 12, Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The National Assembly of Korea established the Clause 2(Assessment Contract), Article 12, by revising the Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act in part on Nov. 29, 2011. The purpose of the new Clause 2, Article 12 of Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act was “to prevent leakage of insurance benefits and improve the medical service quality by strengthening specialty, objectivity and fairness of the medical charge assessment for auto insurance through the medical charge assessment contract with the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the professional assessment institution, because of serious leakage of insurance money by false and excessive medical examination and insurance fraud.”The legal status of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in accordance with Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act is the contractor for medical charge assessment with the insurers. In other words, when an insured causes a car accident and a medical institution requests the medical charge after taking care of that insured, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service assesses if the medical treatment is appropriate for treatment details, determines the medical charge and notifies it to the medical institution. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is the contractor of insurers which does the businesses related to assessment and claims executed by the insurers in the past. The system which an objection against medical charges determined by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the assessment contractor, is made and the final means is the legal action in a court when such objection is not accepted is very unfair treatment for medical institutions in terms of fairness and equity. Accordingly, the insurers shall prevent any objections against the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, their contractors for assessment to which they pay the fees. If it is considered that the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is unfair, it is required to revise the provisions of Article 19 (Assessment Request on Medical Charge of Auto Insurance and Others), Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act, to enable the medical institutions to request the assessment to Auto Insurance Council for the equity between insurers and medical institutions.
Abstract
The National Assembly of Korea established the Clause 2(Assessment Contract), Article 12, by revising the Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act in part on Nov. 29, 2011. The purpose of the new Clause 2, Article 12 of Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act was “to prevent leakage of insurance benefits and improve the medical service quality by strengthening specialty, objectivity and fairness of the medical charge assessment for auto insurance through the medical charge assessment contract with the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the professional assessment institution, because of serious leakage of insurance money by false and excessive medical examination and insurance fraud.”The legal status of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in accordance with Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act is the contractor for medical charge assessment with the insurers. In other words, when an insured causes a car accident and a medical institution requests the medical charge after taking care of that insured, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service assesses if the medical treatment is appropriate for treatment details, determines the medical charge and notifies it to the medical institution. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is the contractor of insurers which does the businesses related to assessment and claims executed by the insurers in the past. The system which an objection against medical charges determined by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the assessment contractor, is made and the final means is the legal action in a court when such objection is not accepted is very unfair treatment for medical institutions in terms of fairness and equity. Accordingly, the insurers shall prevent any objections against the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, their contractors for assessment to which they pay the fees. If it is considered that the assessment results by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service is unfair, it is required to revise the provisions of Article 19 (Assessment Request on Medical Charge of Auto Insurance and Others), Motor Vehicle Compensation Guarantee Act, to enable the medical institutions to request the assessment to Auto Insurance Council for the equity between insurers and medical institutions.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" (2012), 박영사
- 한창희, "보험법" (2011), 국민대학교 출판부
- 김창호, "자동차보험 선택진료의 문제점과 개선방안 연구", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 412 (2003), 대한손해보험협회
- 조규성, "자동차보험 진료수가제도의 적정화 방안에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 51(2), pp.393~427 (2010), 법학연구소
- 안병재, "자동차보험진료수가체계의 문제점 및 의료기관의 사회적 역할 고찰", 의료정책포럼, 4(1) (2006)
- 이득로, "자동차보험 진료수가체계의 문제점과 개선방안", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 402 (2002), 대한손해보험협회
- 자동차보험제도의 문제점 및 개선방안 - 의료부문을 중심으로, "유승윤", 의료정책연구소, ~, pp.연구보고서(2006-2) (2006)
- 정세창, "국내 자동차보험 제도의 문제점과 개선방안-요율 및 진료수가 체계를 중심으로", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 445 (2005), 대한손해보험협회
- 홍정룡, "자동차보험과 건강보험의 심사평가 체계 일원화에 대하여", 대한병원협회지 (2005), 대한병원협회
- "국토해양부 2013년 3월 18일 보도자료", ~ (2013)
- , 국토해양부 주체 ‘자동차사고 환자 입원․통원 가이드라인’ 활용방안 관련 정책토론회 자료집 (2011)
- 금융위원회, "공정사회를 향한 자동차보험 개선대책", 2010.12.29. 보도자료(별첨1), ~ (2010)
- "국민일보 2013년 3월 18일 사회면 보도", ~ (2013)
- "금융감독원 2013년 3월 11일 보도자료", ~ (2013)
- "보험개발원 2012년 7월 9일보도자료", ~ (2012)
- 자동차보험진료수가 합리화 방안연구 연구보고서, "삼일회계법인", ~ (2008)
- 2011년 자동차보험 사망자 현황, , 보험개발원, ~ (2011)
- 2008년도 병원경영분석, , 한국보건산업진흥원, ~ (2009)
