즉결심판제도의 발전적 확대방안
A Study on the Expansive Reform Measures of the Proceeding for Summary Judgements
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The proceeding for summary judgements is a procedure for deciding clearly evidentand minor offences in their quality through simplified procedures. And it is exceptionalsystem of the principle of indictment monopoly on Criminal Procedure Act, initiatedcriminal proceeding by prosecution of a police chief not but a prosecutor(Act on theProceedings for Summary Judgements(APSJ) §3). It has the virtues of speedy andsimple termination of trial, dissolution of defendants’ unstable status, reduction ofunnecessary expenses and so on. So, this proceedings can be an effective method forpreventing that offenders recommit the crime and for rehabilitating them to thesociety. Therefore we need to expansive objects the proceeding for summaryjudgements than present – incident equivalent to detention under 200,000 won, fine,minor fine(APSJ §2). But it is likely to result in insufficient examination and in inadequate protectiondefendants’ rights guaranteed in the criminal procedure. Nevertheless, the proceedingfor summary judgements should be maintained because it has more merits than faultsand its defects can be overcome. Therefore the proceeding for summary judgements isneeded to provide a variety of institutional safeguards to prevent these problems. So, in this paper, I will examinate the advanced researches as to the proceeding forsummary judgements, and suggest the expansive measures of objects the proceedingfor summary judgements and its legal and systematical reform plans.
Abstract
The proceeding for summary judgements is a procedure for deciding clearly evidentand minor offences in their quality through simplified procedures. And it is exceptionalsystem of the principle of indictment monopoly on Criminal Procedure Act, initiatedcriminal proceeding by prosecution of a police chief not but a prosecutor(Act on theProceedings for Summary Judgements(APSJ) §3). It has the virtues of speedy andsimple termination of trial, dissolution of defendants’ unstable status, reduction ofunnecessary expenses and so on. So, this proceedings can be an effective method forpreventing that offenders recommit the crime and for rehabilitating them to thesociety. Therefore we need to expansive objects the proceeding for summaryjudgements than present – incident equivalent to detention under 200,000 won, fine,minor fine(APSJ §2). But it is likely to result in insufficient examination and in inadequate protectiondefendants’ rights guaranteed in the criminal procedure. Nevertheless, the proceedingfor summary judgements should be maintained because it has more merits than faultsand its defects can be overcome. Therefore the proceeding for summary judgements isneeded to provide a variety of institutional safeguards to prevent these problems. So, in this paper, I will examinate the advanced researches as to the proceeding forsummary judgements, and suggest the expansive measures of objects the proceedingfor summary judgements and its legal and systematical reform plans.
참고문헌 (34)
- 강동욱, "형사소송법강의(제2판)" (2014), 오래
- 김용진, "영미법해설 – 형사소송" (2009), 박영사
- 김철수, "사법제도 개선방향" (1992), 교육과학사
- 김환수, "독일형사소송법" (2009), 박영사
- 노명선, "형사소송법" (2009), SKKUP
- 배종대, "형사소송법(제3판)" (2011), 홍문사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법(제3판)" (2011), 법문사
- 이은모, "형사소송법(제3판)" (2012), 박영사
- 이재상, "형사소송법(제9판)" (2012), 박영사
- 임웅, "비범죄화의 이론" (1999), 법문사
- 차용석, "형사소송법(제4판)" (2012), 21세기사
- 최영승, "형사소송법(제2판)" (2013), 도서출판 대명
- 강동욱, "소년범에 대한 즉결심판 활용을 위한 방안", 법과정책연구, 13(1), pp.173~198 (2013), 한국법정책학회
- 강동욱, "경찰훈방의 법적 근거와 활성화 방안- 소년범을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 13(1), pp.67~92 (2013), 경찰대학
- 곽규홍, "경미사건의 효율적 처리방안", 형사정책, 15(2) (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 곽영길, "현행 즉결심판제도의 개선방안 연구", 한국경호경비학회지, (13), pp.47~70 (2007), 한국경호경비학회
- 김형훈, "즉결심판제도의 바람직한 운용방안", 치안정책연구, (15) (2001), 치안연구소
- 즉결심판제도에 관한 연구, "김희옥", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1992)
- 김희옥, "한국헌법학의 현황과 과제 : 금람 김철수 교수 정년기념논문집" (1998)
- 박상진, "즉결심판제도의 문제점과 입법론적 고찰", 중앙법학, 4(1), pp.1~16 (2002), 중앙법학회
- 박찬걸, "개정 경범죄처벌법의 내용에 대한 평가 및 향후과제", 경찰학논총, 7(1), pp.7~37 (2012), 경찰학연구소[DOI]
- 손동권, "즉심사건처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 10(2) (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
- 송광섭, "경미사건의 효율적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (19), pp.47~84 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 성윤환, "現行 卽決審判制度의 問題點과 改善方案", 중앙법학, 8(3), pp.113~156 (2006), 중앙법학회
- 신동운, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안", 형사정책, 15(2) (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 심희기, "경미범죄에 대한 형사정책의 실태와 시민의 반응: 범칙금 통고처분과 즉결심판실무를 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 11(4) (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 오윤성, "군즉결심판제도에 대한 고찰", 한국공안행정학회보, (9) (2000), 한국공안행정학회
- 이동희, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안 - 일본의 경미범죄 처리제도의 비교법적 시사점을 중심으로-", 형사정책, 15(2), pp.369~384 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- 최응렬, "즉결심판제도에 관한 고찰", 한국공안행정학회보, (9) (2000), 한국공안행정학회
- 한영수, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책연구, 9(1) (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
- 황일호, "즉결심판과 통고처분에 있어서의 일사부재리의 효력", 중앙법학, 12(3), pp.311~342 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 즉결심판제도의 문제점과 개선방향, "황태정", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 菊田幸一, "社會のなかの刑事司法と犯罪者" (2007), 日本評論社
- 松本時夫, "條解刑事訴訟法(第3版增補版)" (2008), 弘文堂