본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국에서 피의자신문제도에 관한 개혁과 향후 과제 -중한 피의자신문제도의 비교를 중심으로-

The Reform of Chinese Interrogating Criminal Suspect Institution and Future Researh-the Korean Experience-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

By comparing the interrogating criminal suspect institution of China and Korea,the paper discusses the reform of Chinese interrogating criminal suspect institution and future research. Interrogation one behavior of an investigation by law, the confession obtained by interrogation at the trial is one of the important evidences. Although the material technology has developed unprecedentedly, the interrogation is still one of the most economic ways to investigate. Through the interrogation, we can find out the criminal process, seize the evidences, reduce the investigation costs, and improve the efficiency of the proceedings. However, the interrogation system is imperfect. It leads to the infringement of the suspect which can not be prohibited entirely. It also ruins the self-value of the requirements of the criminal litigation, hinders the democratic and legal process in China. Therefore, the writer concludes the criminal suspects’ rights in interrogation, analyzes the subsistent problems in the interrogation process, summarizes the overseas criminal suspects’ rights in interrogation, and puts forward several suggestions on perfecting the criminal suspects’ human rights at the end.

Abstract

By comparing the interrogating criminal suspect institution of China and Korea,the paper discusses the reform of Chinese interrogating criminal suspect institution and future research. Interrogation one behavior of an investigation by law, the confession obtained by interrogation at the trial is one of the important evidences. Although the material technology has developed unprecedentedly, the interrogation is still one of the most economic ways to investigate. Through the interrogation, we can find out the criminal process, seize the evidences, reduce the investigation costs, and improve the efficiency of the proceedings. However, the interrogation system is imperfect. It leads to the infringement of the suspect which can not be prohibited entirely. It also ruins the self-value of the requirements of the criminal litigation, hinders the democratic and legal process in China. Therefore, the writer concludes the criminal suspects’ rights in interrogation, analyzes the subsistent problems in the interrogation process, summarizes the overseas criminal suspects’ rights in interrogation, and puts forward several suggestions on perfecting the criminal suspects’ human rights at the end.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 方流芳, "中国法学教育观察", 比较法学研究, 2 (1996)
  2. 樊崇义, "迈向理性刑事诉讼法学", pp.3~ (2006), 中国人民公安大学出版社
  3. 樊崇义, "刑事诉讼法学", pp.298~ (2004), 法律出版社
  4. 송영휘, "我国逮捕程序完善之思考, In 河南社会科学" (2009)
  5. 刘金林, "特别报道:刑诉法大修“探秘” 探访条款修改背后的故事", 检察日报, ~ (2012)
  6. 전국인민대표대회 상무위원회 법제사업위원회 형법사무실, "중화인민공화국형사소송법해석" (1996), 法律出版社
  7. 郑瑞琨, "析犯罪嫌疑人之如实回答义务", 人民检察, ~ (2002)
  8. 陈瑞华, "义务本位主义的刑事诉讼模式——论“坦白从宽、抗拒从严”政策的程序效应", 清华法学 (2008)
  9. 樊崇义, "沉默权问题", 法学论坛 (2001)
  10. 樊崇义, "수사기관의 신문時 변호사의 참여권", 중한 제3차 형사소송법국제회의 발표문 (2010)
  11. 진위동, "推动中韩司法制度的共同完善与发展", 法制日报, ~ (2010)
  12. 法制网, "发布时间", ~ (2009)
  13. 신동운, "형사소송법" (2007), 법문사
  14. 신양균, "신판 형사소송법", pp.139~ (2009), 화산미디어
  15. 허일태, "“期待构建以中国为核心东亚法律体系”———专访韩国东亚大学法学研究所所长许一泰教授", 法制日报, ~ (2010)
  16. 오도기, "피의자신문상의 제문제, In 현대의 형사법학: 익헌 박정근박사 화갑기념호" (1990), 법원사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)