컴퓨터프로그램의 특허법상 물건성 인정의 필요성에 대한 고찰
A Study on the Patentability of Computer Programs as the Product in Patent Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For a long time, computer programs has been unpatentable. However, nowadays, if the patent claim is in one of the forms of information processing system, information processing method or computer readable media, it can be awarded to invention regarding computer programs. Major countries in the world recognized that it is not enough that computer programs are protected by copyright, and adopted computer programs claim under some requirements. In other words, expression is protected by copyright law and idea is protected by patent law, and these make computer programs protected by both of them. This effectively makes unauthorized transmission of the patented computer programs impossible. In Korea, computer programs are protected under copyright law, but patent law does not allow computer program claim format and only adopts method or computer readable medium claim format, therefore it is controversial whether the online transmissions of software constitute patent infringements, while Japen patent law are enabling the remedies for patent infringements which occur in the online usage of patented software technologies, such as transmission of patented software through online or mobile platform. So, it is hard to say that Copyright is joining in the environmental change of the software industry and protects the software technology of the national software companies effectively. Online software market like App Store becomes commonplace and this fact creates a strong demand for the protection of the online deployment of computer programs. Now, there is no reason that does not adopt computer programs claim and it’s just time that the patentability of computer programs as the product in Patent Law should be allowed.
Abstract
For a long time, computer programs has been unpatentable. However, nowadays, if the patent claim is in one of the forms of information processing system, information processing method or computer readable media, it can be awarded to invention regarding computer programs. Major countries in the world recognized that it is not enough that computer programs are protected by copyright, and adopted computer programs claim under some requirements. In other words, expression is protected by copyright law and idea is protected by patent law, and these make computer programs protected by both of them. This effectively makes unauthorized transmission of the patented computer programs impossible. In Korea, computer programs are protected under copyright law, but patent law does not allow computer program claim format and only adopts method or computer readable medium claim format, therefore it is controversial whether the online transmissions of software constitute patent infringements, while Japen patent law are enabling the remedies for patent infringements which occur in the online usage of patented software technologies, such as transmission of patented software through online or mobile platform. So, it is hard to say that Copyright is joining in the environmental change of the software industry and protects the software technology of the national software companies effectively. Online software market like App Store becomes commonplace and this fact creates a strong demand for the protection of the online deployment of computer programs. Now, there is no reason that does not adopt computer programs claim and it’s just time that the patentability of computer programs as the product in Patent Law should be allowed.
참고문헌 (27)
- 박동식, "유럽특허법" (2009), 세창출판사
- 사법연수원, "특허법", ~ (2010)
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2012), 박영사
- 이은경, "미국 특허법" (2004), 세창출판사
- 조영선, "특허법(제3판)" (2011), 도서출판 박영사
- 전준형, "미국특허법" (2011), 세창출판사
- 정상조, "특허법 주해 I" (2010), 박영사
- Embedded Software를 중심으로 한 소프트웨어 권리보호 전략연구, "특허청", ~ (2008)
- 특허청, "컴퓨터 관련 발명 심사기준 해설", ~ (2007)
- 프로그램 발명의 보호강화에 따른 경제적 효과 및 법제연구, "특허청", ~ (2012)
- BM특허의 국내외 보호현황 및 발전방향에 대한 연구, "특허청", ~ (2008)
- 한국특허법학회, "특허판례연구" (2010), 박영사
- 구대환, "컴퓨터프로그램의 기술적 특성과 특허 및 저작권 보호", 정보법학, 9(2) (2005), 한국정보법학회
- 권태복, "프로그램의 특허성 인정과 쟁점", 산업재산권, (39), pp.91~128 (2012), 한국지식재산학회
- 김관식, "컴퓨터프로그램의 특허법상 보호에 관한 특허법 제2조 개정시안의 법적 의의 및 과제", 법학연구, 23(1), pp.549~582 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김관식, "컴퓨터프로그램의 특허법적 보호", 정보화정책, 13(4), pp.108~127 (2006), 한국정보화진흥원
- 김관식, "物件의 發明, 方法의 發明: 分類基準과 適用", 산업재산권, (17), pp.1~30 (2005), 한국지식재산학회
- 김원학, "소프트웨어 보호방법에 대한 고찰", 정보법학, 10(2) (2006), 한국정보법학회
- 김태현, "영업방법(BM) 발명의 특허요건과 권리범위에 관한 실무적 고찰", 사법논집, 46 (2008), 법원도서관
- 박준석, "영업방법 발명 등 컴퓨터프로그램 관련 발명의 특허법적 보호에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 비교사법, 16(3), pp.453~509 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 육소영, "컴퓨터 프로그램의 특허성", 비교사법, 10(2), pp.481~512 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 이상정, "검퓨터프로그램보호방법의 재검토", 서울대학교 법학, 48(1), pp.105~128 (2007), 법학연구소
- 조성광, "다시 프로그램발명을 말하다", 특허와상표, (809) (2013), 대한변리사회
- 문화체육관광부, "특허법 일부개정법률(안)에 대한 검토 의견", ~ (2011)
- 관계부처(문화부) 의견에 대한 검토 결과, "특허청", ~ (2011)
- 中山信弘, "註解 特許法" (2000), 靑林書院
- EPO, "Patents for Software?", European law and Practice, ~ (2008)
