中国民族自治地方单行条例立法后评估的法治化研究 -----以延边朝鲜族自治州为例
The research on legalization of specific regulations assessment in national autonomous areas of China -- take yanbian korean autonomous prefecture as an example
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
为检验单行条例的实施效果,提升单行条例的立法质量,近年来中国延边朝鲜族自治州等部分民族自治地方开展了单行条例立法后评估工作。目前,民族自治地方尚未形成统一、规范的单行条例立法后评估制度。单行条例的立法后评估中主要存在立法后评估的适用范围不明确,立法后评估主体单一,立法后评估标准不全面,立法后评估方法的科学性不足等问题。民族自治地方应进一步加强单行条例立法后评估的制度化和法治化。应制定专门的立法后评估办法,明确单行条例立法后评估的适用范围。应构建多元化立法后评估主体,可以尝试第三方组织作为评估主体,以保证立法后评估结果的客观和公正。应确立科学的立法后评估标准,注重实效性标准和地方与民族特色性标准的运用。应综合运用多元化的立法后评估方法,注重成本效益分析方法的运用,加强公众的参与。应规范评估结论的运用,将评估结论作为单行条例立改废乃至制定新单行条例的重要依据。
Abstract
In recent years, some ethnic autonomous areas such as yanbian korean autonomous prefecture in China in order to test the effect of implementation, improve the quality of legislation, have carried out the evaluation work after the legislation of separate regulations. Presently, thenational autonomous areas have not formed a unified and standardized post-legislation evaluation system of special regulations. Through the evaluation of special regulations after legislation, some problems are found, such as unclear scope of application, single subject of post-legislation evaluation, incomplete standard of post-legislation evaluation, and unscientific method of post-legislation evaluation. Therefore, national autonomous areas should further strengthen the institutionalization and legalization of post-legislation evaluation of special regulations. National autonomous areas shall be established after the special legislation to evaluation, definit special legislation after the scope of the assessment. In order to ensure the objectivity and justice of the post-legislation evaluation results, the democratic autonomous areas should construct the pluralistic post-legislation evaluation subjects, and try to use the third party organization as the evaluation subject. The democratic autonomous areas shall be established scientific post-legislation evaluation standards, pay attention to the practical effectiveness standards and the application of local and national characteristics standards. National autonomous areas shall be integrated use of diversified evaluation method after legislation, pay more attention to the use of cost-benefit analysis method, strengthen the public participation. Finally, the national autonomous areas should standardize the application of the evaluation conclusion, and take the evaluation conclusion as an important basis for the establishment, modification and abolition of the special regulations.
참고문헌 (18)
- 俞荣根, "地方立法后评估研究" (2009), 民主法制出版社
- 汪全胜, "立法后评估研究" (2012), 人民出版社
- 刘作翔, "立法后评估的理论实践" (2013), 社会科学文献出版社
- 袁曙宏, "立法后评估工作指南" (2013), 中国法制出版社
- 刘作翔, "立法后评估的理论与实践" (2013), 社会科学文献出版社
- 吴宗金, "中国民族区域自治法学" (2016), 法律出版社
- 吴大华, "论民族自治地方单行条例的完善——以《××省××自治县摩梭人民俗文化保护条例》(草案)的制定为例", 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 35(01) (2015)
- 戴小明, "单行条例立法个案评估——以《Y省W壮族苗族自治州W三七发展条例》为例", 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 33(01) (2015)
- 王允武, "民族自治地方单行条例立法检视——以近三年为样本", 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (03) (2015)
- 俞荣根, "地方立法后评估指标体系研究", 中国政法大学学报, (01) (2014)
- 杨芳, "我国民族自治地方单行条例立法的考察分析", 理论与改革, (02) (2013)
- 席涛, "立法评估 : 评估什么和如何评估(下)——以中国立法评估为例", 政法论坛, 31(01) (2013)
- 席涛, "立法评估 : 评估什么和如何评估(上)——以中国立法评估为例", 政法论坛, 30(05) (2012)
- 陈书全, "论我国立法后评估启动的常态化", 法学论坛, 27(03) (2012)
- 王称心, "立法后评估标准的概念, 维度及影响因素分析", 法学杂志, 33(11) (2012)
- 俞荣根, "立法后评估 : 提高立法质量的有效途径", 公民导刊, (04) (2010)
- 汪全胜, "立法后评估的标准探讨", 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), (03) (2008)
- 丁贤, "立法后评估理论与实践初论", 政治与法律, (01) (2008)
