본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터폴을 통한 국제공조수사의 개선방안

A Study to Improve the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Investigation via INTERPOL

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

INTERPOL is an international police cooperation organization for exchanging required information and conducting criminal investigation through mutual assistance among the member states in order to prevent and suppress international crimes. The international mutual assistance in criminal investigation is divided into the case of conducting investigation via INTERPOL and the case via diplomatic channel based on the International Criminal Justice Mutual Assistance Law and the Extradition Law. The former has the advantage of being able to quickly and efficiently conduct criminal investigation through mutual assistance, but its lack of legal binding power creates the human rights infringement issue for the criminal. In the case of the latter, it is the opposite case. Accordingly,there is a need to find a balance and harmony between the two. For the purpose of efficiently utilizing INTERPOL, it is necessary to expand the scope of criminal investigation through mutual assistance via INTERPOL based on the laws and ordinances related to the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Investigation & Extradition, and request for provisional arrest via INTERPOL, and come up with a provision for acknowledging the effect of the red notice as equivalent to that of provisional arrest request. If these measures are not feasible, another way is to enact laws and ordinances related to comprehensive and integrated INTERPOL cooperation. On a practical level, it would be necessary to expand the organization and personnel in charge of INTERPOL, as well as increase the number of overseas resident police officers dispatched to assist the INTERPOL activities. Ultimately, it would be necessary for the INTERPOL headquarters to enact laws and regulations with internationally common effect like that of the UN.

Abstract

INTERPOL is an international police cooperation organization for exchanging required information and conducting criminal investigation through mutual assistance among the member states in order to prevent and suppress international crimes. The international mutual assistance in criminal investigation is divided into the case of conducting investigation via INTERPOL and the case via diplomatic channel based on the International Criminal Justice Mutual Assistance Law and the Extradition Law. The former has the advantage of being able to quickly and efficiently conduct criminal investigation through mutual assistance, but its lack of legal binding power creates the human rights infringement issue for the criminal. In the case of the latter, it is the opposite case. Accordingly,there is a need to find a balance and harmony between the two. For the purpose of efficiently utilizing INTERPOL, it is necessary to expand the scope of criminal investigation through mutual assistance via INTERPOL based on the laws and ordinances related to the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Investigation & Extradition, and request for provisional arrest via INTERPOL, and come up with a provision for acknowledging the effect of the red notice as equivalent to that of provisional arrest request. If these measures are not feasible, another way is to enact laws and ordinances related to comprehensive and integrated INTERPOL cooperation. On a practical level, it would be necessary to expand the organization and personnel in charge of INTERPOL, as well as increase the number of overseas resident police officers dispatched to assist the INTERPOL activities. Ultimately, it would be necessary for the INTERPOL headquarters to enact laws and regulations with internationally common effect like that of the UN.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 경찰대학, "경찰외사론" (2000), 경찰대학
  2. 경찰청, "인터폴" (2002), 경찰청
  3. 경찰청, "국제공조수사 매뉴얼" (2005), 경찰청
  4. 경찰청, "경찰백서" (2010), 경찰청
  5. 이재곤, "국제법" (2010), 박영사
  6. 박기륜, "국제범죄론" (2004), 비전캐릭터
  7. 백진현, "국제형사사법공조에 관한 연구" (1993), 한국형사정책연구원
  8. 법무부, "국제형사업무 자료집(형사사법공조편)" (1994), 법무부
  9. 사법연수원, "국제형사법" (2010), 사법연수원
  10. 서울지방검찰청, "외사사범 수사실무" (2002), 서울지방검찰청
  11. 문규석, "인터폴의 국제법상 지위에 관한 연구", 국제법평론, 통권 : 12 (1999)
  12. 유하영, "인터폴의 국제법상 지위", 사회과학논총, 11 (1996)
  13. 森下忠, "犯罪人引渡法の理論" (1993), 成文堂
  14. Alona E. Evans, "Legal aspects of International Terrorism" (1978), Lexington
  15. Alona E. Evans, "Acquisition of Custody over the International FugitiveOffender-Alternative to Extradition; A Survey of United StatesPractice", British Yearbook International Law, 40, pp.77~ (1964)
  16. Bresler Fenton, "Inside story ; Interpol and the changing face of internationalpolicing" (1998)
  17. M. Cherif Bassiouni, "International Extradition" (1996), United States Law andPractice
  18. Ethan A. Nadelmann, "The Evolution of United States Involvement in theInternational Rendition of Fugitive Criminals", N.Y. University Journal International Law and Politics, 25, pp.813~ (1993)
  19. Paul Lansing, "The Farmbelt Fuehrer ; Consequences ofTransnational Communication of Political and Racist Speech", Neb. L. Rev, 76, pp.653~ (1997)
  20. Report on the Value of Red Notices and the NewSystem, "INTERPOL Report", ICPO-INTERPOL GeneralSecretariat, 15~, pp.AGN (1998), 67[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)