공정증서유언과 공증인법
A Study on the Will Form of Notary Document and the Notary Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Civil Law requires a strictness in the way of Will to prevent legal troubles in advance, since Will is a final self expression of a testator and becomes effective legally after his death. So the Civil Law recognized theway of Will as an effective Will only when it meets complicated conditions and procedures which are disciplined by the Civil Law. By the way, the strictness and complication of this way of Will could cause a social happenings as like an evasion or a denial of Will behavior could be a interruption of a testator's private action. This happening would be no problem when the frequency in use of Will is low, but the should consider the counter plan as the frequency becomes increasing and the freedom of Will is recognized as an important value. Therefore, the condition of Will Form of Notary document should be lightened and complemented more of less, a shown in the foreign precedent theory concerning Will Form of Notary Document, and in the Notary Act which is the subsidiary Civil Law. Actual condition among the conditions of Will Form of Notary Document should be applied strictly in the way of Will, and should be invalid when they are against it. When a condition among conditions of Will Form of Notary Document, which doesn't fall under the actual condition, corresponds to an identity, a real Will, and Will Form of testator, the explanation should be lightened of Will notarial system should be operated flexibly to get rid of an uncertainty of testator's real-Will, then the legal effect could be regarded as valid. We could substitute oral by writing, read by interpretation which are in the Civil Law Article 1068 about Will Form of Notary Document. However we should prepare the legal complementary system to discern a certainty of Will existence, the real mind of testator, to protect the freedom of Will who are deaf and dumb, and just in the case of lost, damage, forgery alteration of Will Form. Then essential examination about system and law which are related with Will Form of Notary Document is required rather than lightening of the way of Will.
Abstract
The Civil Law requires a strictness in the way of Will to prevent legal troubles in advance, since Will is a final self expression of a testator and becomes effective legally after his death. So the Civil Law recognized theway of Will as an effective Will only when it meets complicated conditions and procedures which are disciplined by the Civil Law. By the way, the strictness and complication of this way of Will could cause a social happenings as like an evasion or a denial of Will behavior could be a interruption of a testator's private action. This happening would be no problem when the frequency in use of Will is low, but the should consider the counter plan as the frequency becomes increasing and the freedom of Will is recognized as an important value. Therefore, the condition of Will Form of Notary document should be lightened and complemented more of less, a shown in the foreign precedent theory concerning Will Form of Notary Document, and in the Notary Act which is the subsidiary Civil Law. Actual condition among the conditions of Will Form of Notary Document should be applied strictly in the way of Will, and should be invalid when they are against it. When a condition among conditions of Will Form of Notary Document, which doesn't fall under the actual condition, corresponds to an identity, a real Will, and Will Form of testator, the explanation should be lightened of Will notarial system should be operated flexibly to get rid of an uncertainty of testator's real-Will, then the legal effect could be regarded as valid. We could substitute oral by writing, read by interpretation which are in the Civil Law Article 1068 about Will Form of Notary Document. However we should prepare the legal complementary system to discern a certainty of Will existence, the real mind of testator, to protect the freedom of Will who are deaf and dumb, and just in the case of lost, damage, forgery alteration of Will Form. Then essential examination about system and law which are related with Will Form of Notary Document is required rather than lightening of the way of Will.
참고문헌 (49)
- 곽윤직, "상속법(개정판)" (2004), 박영사
- 김용한, "친족상속법(보정판)" (2003), 박영사
- 김주수, "주석 민법〔상속(2)〕(제2판)" (2005), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "친족․상속법(제9판 5쇄)" (2010), 법문사
- 문숙자, "조선시대 재산상속과 가족" (2005), 경인문화사
- 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록(하권 친족편 상속편)" (1948), 민법안심의소위원회
- 박동섭, "친족상속법(3정판)" (2009), 박영사
- 박병호, "가족법(전정판)" (1991), 한국방송통신대학교
- 박정기, "가족법-친족상속법-(제2판)" (2008), 삼영사
- 법제처, "경국대전" (1993), 한국법제연구원
- 이경희, "가족법(친족법․상속법)(전정판)" (2008), 법원사
- 이근식, "신친족상속법(증보중판)" (1980), 일조각
- 조승현, "친족․상속법" (2009), 신조사
- 한봉희, "가족법(2010년 개정판)" (2010), 푸른세상
- 현승종, "로마법원론" (1980), 일조각
- 권오봉, "공정증서유언에서 유언취지의 구수", 부산법조, (27) (2010), 부산지방변호사회
- 김민중, "공정증서유언의 유효를 위한 요건-대법원 1996. 4. 23. 선고, 95다34514판결", 공증과 신뢰, 통권 : 4 (2011), 대한공증인협회
- 김영희, "공정증서유언과 장애인차별", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.8~298 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 김영희, "현행민법상 유언의 방식에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(2), pp.117~160 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 남상우, "공정증서에 의한 유언에 관한 고찰-그 법적 성격 및 공증인법과의 관계를중심으로", 대한공증협회지, 통권 : 3 (2010), 대한공증협회
- 법무부 법무과, "공증인법 개정의 배경 및 주요 내용", 대한공증협회지, 통권 : 3 (2010), 대한공증협회
- 이재성, "공정증서에 의한 유언의 방식", 사법행정, 한국사법행정학회
- 전혜정, "민법상 유언상속에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(3), pp.151~180 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 장재형, "공정증서유언상의 증인적격", 대한공증협회지, (창간) (2008)
- 장재형, "한국공증제도의 현황분석 및 개선방안:가족법․지적재산권법에서의 새로운역할을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2009
- 정갑주, "공정증서에 의한 유언방식", 판례월보, (279) (1993), 판례월보사
- 현소혜, "유언의 보충적 해석", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.111~150 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 현소혜, "유언방식의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.1~52 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 加藤永一, (1987), 一粒社
- 高橋朋子(外2人), "民法7 親族․相續(第2版)" (2008), 有斐閣
- 高島秀行, "相續․遺産分割する前に讀む本(3訂版)" (2006), 稅務經理協會
- 久保木康晴(譯), "アメリカの相續法-全50州の相續權と相續分" (1988), 芦書房
- 近藤英吉, "相續法-現代外國法典叢書(5)" (1988), 有斐閣
- 來栖三朗, "來栖三朗著作集Ⅲ 家族法" (2004), 信山社
- 蕪山嚴(外4人), "遺言法體系" (1995), 西神田編集室
- 石川利夫, "家族法講義(下)相續法(改訂版)" (1984), 評論社
- 船田享二, "ロ-マ法第4卷-私法第三分冊(家族․相續)" (1971), 岩波書店
- 原田慶吉, "日本民法典の史的素描" (1954), 創文社
- 林良平, "注解判例民法4 親族法․相續法" (1992), 靑林書院
- 中川善之助, "新版注釋民法(28) 相續(3) 遺言․遺留分(補訂版)" (2002), 有斐閣
- 泉久雄(外5人), "講座現代家族法第6卷遺言" (1991), 日本評論社
- 喜頭兵一, "李朝の財産相續法" (1936), 朝鮮總督府中樞院
- 床谷文雄, "相續" (2001), 日本評論社
- Bartholomeyczik․Schlüer, "Erbrechts" (1980), C.H.Beck
- FeridFirshing, "Internationales Erbrecht BandⅡ Deutschland - Frankreich (Deutsch land Frankreich)ⅢGriechenland-Jugoslawien(Italien,Japan)․ⅤRumäien-Ungarn(Schweiz)" (1992), C.H.Beck
- Griechenland-Jugoslawien, "ⅤRumäien-Ungarn" (1992), C.H.Beck
- Lange․Kuchinke, "Lehrbuch des Erbrechts" (1978), C.H.Beck
- Meryl Thomas, "Blackstone's Statutes on Property Law" (1991), Blackstone
- Parry․Clark, "The Law of Succession(Ninth Edition)" (1988), Sweet & Maxwell