청주 시청사 본관동 철거에 대한 참여주체별 시계열 대응 분석

Abstract

The urban regeneration policy is changing into a paradigm that reflects various interests. As a number of voting dispatches inevitably dispatched, the urban regeneration policy is considered a representative potential social conflict area. As the regeneration area of our society expands, the cost of conflict is also increasing. In order to maturely resolve social conflicts, the importance of mutual understanding between individuals and groups is increasing. Using Kingdon's multiple streams framework, this study analyzes in stakeholder’ responses to the destruction process of the Cheongju city main hall. The policy process for building Cheongju city Hall is classified according to the controversy over the demolition of the Cheongju city main hall. In addition, stakeholder are actively analyzed to realize the policy agenda for each classified policy process. Among the policy entrepreneurs, those who continue to participate were selected as stakeholders, and the countermeasures for the policy were examined. The analysis is as follows. First, while the construction of the new Cheongju city hall has been drifting for over 10 years, Mayor of Cheongju's position on the Cheongju city main hall has changed four times. The policy for building the new Cheongju city hall is divided into four stages, because the policy window opens and closes three times depending on whether or not the main building is preserved. Second, in the policy of new Cheongju city hall, eight policy entrepreneurs for the main building can be selected. Among them, four stakeholders are interested in the main building with continuity. Third, local NGO of stakeholders used the most diverse strategies to reflect their opinions. Among stakeholders, local NGO organizations are only legal authority to participate in policy as the only informal participants, but there was a big impact on policy. Lastly, the responses of each stakeholder influenced the policy on the Cheongju city main hall but did not affect the resolution of the conflicts arising in the policy process. The core of the main hall debate was the difference in positions on the values of modern cultural properties. However, the strategy to resolve the difference in positions of each stakeholder was insufficient. If we want to reduce the cost of social conflict in the regeneration project, it is necessary to prepare a device to lead social consensus. In particular, it is necessary to think about a system that can sufficiently understand each logic beyond the physical combination of various stakeholders.