중국식 민주주의와 엘리트 충원방식
Chinese Style Democracy and the Cadre Selection
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China is experimenting diverse ways to achieve the representation of the people in various senses. For example, the Chinese government takes advantage of its own executives-selection and- employment system which regards an executive as a representative of people. China has operated various executives -election and -employment systems to meet ‘the expectation and hope’ of people. Therefore, China has reserved to introduce an overall and perfect election-system. Rather China is trying to find democracy in chinese tradition. In this context, ‘the consensus-recommendation system’ for electing executives in the chinese government reminds us the limitedness of voting-model democracy which amplifies the importance of procedural legitimacy. In accordance with this, the paper has cast a different perspective on the procedural democracy which we accept as universal with more focus on the chinese own executives-election and -employment system, because it is possible to find a certain type of chinese democracy, especially in its employee-referral and consensus-recommendation system. Moreover, this paper points out that the democracy can be guaranteed not only by the electoral procedure, but also the consensus-recommendation process. In short, this paper considers the chinese executives-selection and -election system on the concentration on the democratic perspective and evaluates the new experimental trials of the present chinese Xi Jinping's government on a traditional context.
Abstract
China is experimenting diverse ways to achieve the representation of the people in various senses. For example, the Chinese government takes advantage of its own executives-selection and- employment system which regards an executive as a representative of people. China has operated various executives -election and -employment systems to meet ‘the expectation and hope’ of people. Therefore, China has reserved to introduce an overall and perfect election-system. Rather China is trying to find democracy in chinese tradition. In this context, ‘the consensus-recommendation system’ for electing executives in the chinese government reminds us the limitedness of voting-model democracy which amplifies the importance of procedural legitimacy. In accordance with this, the paper has cast a different perspective on the procedural democracy which we accept as universal with more focus on the chinese own executives-election and -employment system, because it is possible to find a certain type of chinese democracy, especially in its employee-referral and consensus-recommendation system. Moreover, this paper points out that the democracy can be guaranteed not only by the electoral procedure, but also the consensus-recommendation process. In short, this paper considers the chinese executives-selection and -election system on the concentration on the democratic perspective and evaluates the new experimental trials of the present chinese Xi Jinping's government on a traditional context.
참고문헌 (51)
- 다니엘 벨, "파워 인터뷰: 능력주의 정치와 좋은 리더의 선발", 성균차이나브리프, 2(3)통권 : 32 (2014)
- 마인섭, "아시아에서의 ‘좋은 민주주의’의 모색: 개념과 평가", 비교민주주의연구, 10(1), pp.5~31 (2014), 비교민주주의학회
- 성균중국연구소, "중앙당교(中央黨校) 심층 분석", 성균차이나포커스, (9) (2014)
- 성균중국연구소, "중국은 어떻게 엘리트를 충원하는가", 성균차이나포커스, (18) (2015)
- 왕샤오광, "민주사강 : 중국 경제성장의 길목에서 민주주의를 묻다" (2010), 에버리치 홀딩스
- 이희옥, "중국의 새로운 민주주의 모색" (2014), 성균관대학 출판사
- 이희옥, "시진핑 시기 반부패운동의 정치논리 -시장, 법치, 거브넌스의 관계-", 중소연구, 39(1), pp.17~48 (2015), 아태지역연구센터
- 장용러, "능력주의 정치와 민주 정당성", 성균차이나브리프, 2(3) (2014)
- 조원빈, "2010년 아시아 국가들의 좋은 민주주의 지표", ~
- Bernard Manin, "Democracy, Accountability and Representation" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Michael S. Lewis-Beck, "A Chinese Popularity Function : Sources of Government Support", Political Research Quarterly (2013)
- Wen Fang Tang, "Government for the people in China", The Diplomat (2013)
- Yang Zhong, "Regime Support in Urban China", Asian Survey, 53(2) (2013)
- Youwei, "Authoritarian Adaptation Hits a Wall", Foreign Affairs (2015)
- 歐德良, "漢代察擧制與現今幹部選拔制度", 社科縱橫, 23(8) (2008)
- 蘭喜陽, "黨政領導幹部選拔任用制度改革與完善研究", 박사, pp.2004
- 賴華明, "漢代察舉制的內容及其功過", 西南民族大學學報(人文社科版), (11) (2003)
- 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集 第2卷" (1991), 人民出版社
- 謝春濤, "中國共産黨如何治理國家" (2014), 新世界出版社
- 蘇張和, "走出民主政治硏究的困局", 求是, (11) (2013)
- 孫作頂, "公開差額選拔——民主選拔的新突破", 黨員幹部之友, (10) (2011)
- 習近平, "習近平談治國理政" (2014), 外文出版社
- 楊鳳春, "圖解當代中國政治" (2011), 中華書局
- 楊雪冬, "關於幹部民主選拔改革的若幹思考", 新視野, (02) (2012)
- 吳瀚飛, "中國公開選拔領導幹部制度研究", 박사, pp.2001
- 吳瀚飛, "中國公開選拔領導幹部制度硏究" (2002), 中國社會科學出版社
- 汪繼紅, "中國公開選拔領導幹部考試制度研究", 박사, pp.2009
- 王紹光, "國家治理" (2014), 中國人民大學出版社
- 韋靖源, "中國古代社會人才選拔制度探析", 黑龍江史志, (23) (2014)
- 人民日報評論部, "習近平用典" (2015), 人民日報出版社
- 任建明, "領導幹部選拔制度模式研究", 清華大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (S1) (2003)
- 林學啟, "黨政領導幹部選拔任用原則研究", 박사, pp.2006
- 張維爲, "中國震撼：一個"文明型國家"的崛起" (2011), 上海人民出版社
- 張志軍, "當代中國領導幹部管理機制研究", 박사, pp.2005
- 張學偉, "中國黨政領導幹部選拔任用的民主機制研究", 박사, pp.2012
- 張向鴻, "中國黨政領導幹部選拔任用制度研究", 박사, pp.2014
- 儲建國, "中國政治精英產生方式", 人民論壇, (27) (2014)
- 朱光磊, "當代中國政府過程" (2008), 天津人民出版社
- 中共中央文獻研究室, "十八大以來重要文獻選編(上)" (2014), 中央文獻出版社
- 陳漢威, "漢代至明清時期的人才選拔制度研究", 學理論, (27) (2014)
- "光明日報", ~ (2014)
- "2010-2020年深化幹部人事制度改革規劃綱要", ~