The Spirit of the Convention – Interlocking Principles and Ethics for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since December 2015, a set of twelve Ethical Principles for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage enriches the paradigm of the 2003 UNESCO Convention. At the meeting of its Intergovernmental Committee at Windhoek where those principles were endorsed, and where a whole chapter of new operational directives was fine-tuned in order to respond to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN General Assembly, 25 September 2015), the UNESCO Secretariat was instructed to build an on-line platform with a toolkit about ethics and safeguarding intangible heritage. Accredited NGOs were also finally invited to collaborate and play a role in developing and updating the 2003 UNESCO Convention and its operational directives. This is a major breakthrough. In this article we trace and discuss this ‘hop’ (1999), ‘skip’ (2012-2015) and ‘jump’ process (2016 onwards) in the emerging paradigm of safeguarding ICH. Why twelve principles and not a supermodel code of ethics for (safeguarding) intangible heritage? How do innovations like ‘sustained free and informed consent’ or ‘benefit sharing’ open new doors? What do anthropology, folklore studies and museology have to offer? Is the online platform a good idea, in the light of recent developments in international conventions on biodiversity, bioethics or the work of WIPO and other organisations ?
Abstract
Since December 2015, a set of twelve Ethical Principles for Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage enriches the paradigm of the 2003 UNESCO Convention. At the meeting of its Intergovernmental Committee at Windhoek where those principles were endorsed, and where a whole chapter of new operational directives was fine-tuned in order to respond to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN General Assembly, 25 September 2015), the UNESCO Secretariat was instructed to build an on-line platform with a toolkit about ethics and safeguarding intangible heritage. Accredited NGOs were also finally invited to collaborate and play a role in developing and updating the 2003 UNESCO Convention and its operational directives. This is a major breakthrough. In this article we trace and discuss this ‘hop’ (1999), ‘skip’ (2012-2015) and ‘jump’ process (2016 onwards) in the emerging paradigm of safeguarding ICH. Why twelve principles and not a supermodel code of ethics for (safeguarding) intangible heritage? How do innovations like ‘sustained free and informed consent’ or ‘benefit sharing’ open new doors? What do anthropology, folklore studies and museology have to offer? Is the online platform a good idea, in the light of recent developments in international conventions on biodiversity, bioethics or the work of WIPO and other organisations ?
참고문헌 (20)
- Aikawa-Faure, Noriko, "Le patrimoine culturel immatériel à la lumière de l’Extrême-Orient", pp.13~46 (2009), Babel
- Robert Baron, "Public folklore dialogism and critical heritage studies", International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(8), pp.588~606 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Besterman, Tristram, "A Companion to Museum Studies", pp.431~441 (2011), Wiley-Blackwell
- Britta, Rudolff, "A Community Convention? An analysis of Free, Prior and Informed Consent given under the 2003 Convention", International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 8, pp.153~164 (2013)
- Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, "Ethics and Anthropology. Ideas and Practice", pp.2003, Altamira Press
- Hein, Hilde, "The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics. Redefining Ethics for the Twenty-First-Century Museum", pp.112~126 (2011), Routledge
- Honko, Lauri, "Do we need a folkloristic code of ethics?", FF News, pp.2~7 (2001)
- Apertures and Envelopes. ICH Directives and Organs in Operation’ in Evaluating the Inscription Criteria for the Two Lists of UNESCO's Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention. The 10th Anniversary of the 2003 Convention. Final Report, "Jacobs, Marc", International Research Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region, 129~137 (2013)
- Jacobs, Marc, "Brokerage, Addressing Boundaries and the New Paradigm of Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage. Folklore Studies, Transdisciplinary Perspectives and UNESCO", Volkskunde, 115, pp.265~291 (2014)
- Jacobs, Marc, "Development Brokerage, Anthropology and Public Action. Local Empowerment, International Cooperation and Aid: Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage", Volkskunde, 115, pp.299~318 (2014)
- Kono, Toshijoko, "Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property. Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development" (2009), Antwerp-Oxford-Portland
- Kurin, Richard, "Reflections of a Culture Broker. A View from the Smithsonian" (1997), Smithsonian Institution Press
- Kurin, Richard, "Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: Key Factors in Implementing the 2003 Convention", International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 2, pp.10~20 (2007)
- Marstine, Janet, "The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics: Redefining Ethics for the Twenty-First Century Museum", pp.3~25 (2011), Routledge
- McCann, Anthony, "Safeguarding Traditional Cultures: A Global Assessment", pp.57~61 (2001), Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage Smithsonian Institution
- Meskell , Lynn, "Embedding Ethics", pp.1~28 (2005), Berg
- Pels, Peter, "Embedding Ethics", pp.69~100 (2005), Berg
- Schroeder, Doris, "Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case", pp.11~26 (2009), Springer Science+Business Media B. V
- Schroeder, Doris, "Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case", pp.27~51 (2009), Springer Science+Business Media B. V
- Simon, Bradford S., "Safeguarding Traditional Cultures: A Global Assessment", pp.111~142 (2001), Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage Smithsonian Institution