본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Intangible Cultural Heritage in Times of ‘Superdiversity’: Exploring Ways of Transformation

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The author reflects on policy and practice development concerning intangible cultural heritage (ICH), from the perspective of cultural diversity as a part of the framework of appreciation and objectives relating to the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH (2003). The author explains the current evolution towards a superdiverse society, and determines that ICH is identified in the preambles of the UNESCO 2003 Convention as a source of enrichment for cultural diversity, of mutual human understanding and exchange. The Convention has existed for over a decade, making it possible to reflect on its international implementation with respect to the aspect of cultural diversity: i.e. what do we learn from the realisation and interaction with the Lists and Register in the context of the Convention, and surrounding debates? The author examines how the choices and implementation of the ICH Convention, developments in the field and the effects on the practice can be evaluated in the intervening years with an approach of diversity. Finally, the author wishes to formulate a vision and to foster reflections on ICH and diversity (policy) with this. A plea follows to open up the thinking around ICH and diversity, and thus to approach it as diversely as possible; since a focus on an (often) ethniccultural approach potentially creates the contrary effect from the intention of the entire ICH discourse and ICH policy development: a striving towards a more shared understanding and exchange, and enrichment of cultural diversity and human creativity.

Abstract

The author reflects on policy and practice development concerning intangible cultural heritage (ICH), from the perspective of cultural diversity as a part of the framework of appreciation and objectives relating to the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH (2003). The author explains the current evolution towards a superdiverse society, and determines that ICH is identified in the preambles of the UNESCO 2003 Convention as a source of enrichment for cultural diversity, of mutual human understanding and exchange. The Convention has existed for over a decade, making it possible to reflect on its international implementation with respect to the aspect of cultural diversity: i.e. what do we learn from the realisation and interaction with the Lists and Register in the context of the Convention, and surrounding debates? The author examines how the choices and implementation of the ICH Convention, developments in the field and the effects on the practice can be evaluated in the intervening years with an approach of diversity. Finally, the author wishes to formulate a vision and to foster reflections on ICH and diversity (policy) with this. A plea follows to open up the thinking around ICH and diversity, and thus to approach it as diversely as possible; since a focus on an (often) ethniccultural approach potentially creates the contrary effect from the intention of the entire ICH discourse and ICH policy development: a striving towards a more shared understanding and exchange, and enrichment of cultural diversity and human creativity.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Barrico, A., "An Essay on the Mutation of Culture", pp.305~306 (2013)
  2. "Text of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage"[URL]
  3. "Also Finland in its recent ICH policy development has built diversity into its approach; read more"[URL]
  4. "Opname in de Inventaris Vlaanderen"[URL]
  5. "Third session of the General Assembly of the States Parties"[URL]
  6. The first Cultural-heritage Decree also began in this period, "in Flanders. From 1998 there was a separate Decree on Folk Culture", ~ (2008)
  7. "For an overview of the National Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Netherlands"[URL]
  8. Jacobs, M, "Cultural Brokerage, Addressing Boundaries and the New Paradigm of Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage Folklore Studies, Transdisciplinary Perspectives and UNESCO", Volkskunde. Tijdschrift over de cultuur van het dagelijks leven, 115(3), pp.265~291 (2014)
  9. Arizpe, L., "Culture, Diversity and Heritage: Major Studies", pp.114~115 (2015)
  10. Khaznadar, C., "Warning: The Intangible Heritage in Danger", Internationale de l’imaginaire, (29), pp.126~ (2014)
  11. "Operational Directives for the implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage"[URL]
  12. See, inter alia, "the passage in the preamble of the Convention - Recognizing that the processes of globalization and social transformation, alongside the conditions they create for renewed dialogue among communities, also give rise, as does the phenomenon of intolerance, to grave threats of deterioration, disappearance and destruction of the intangible cultural heritage, in particular owing to a lack of resources for safeguarding such heritage", ~
  13. Huntington, S. P., "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" (1996)
  14. "See the work of P. Gielen"[URL]
  15. "Read more"[URL]
  16. "Operational Directives for the 2003 Convention"[URL]
  17. "Resolution of the General Assembly: 6.GA 7"[URL]
  18. Arizpe, L., "Annexe. General Discussion: Identifying Key Issues", pp.121~132 (2013), Anthropological Perspectives on Intangible Cultural Heritage
  19. Burke, P., "Cultural Hybridity", pp.7~ (2009)
  20. "Echoing Voices. Cultural Diversity: A Path to Sustainable Development. Tenth anniversary of the adoption of the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity" (2011)[URL]
  21. "Beyond Culturalism and Statism. Liberal Responses to Diversity, Eurosphere working paper, no. 6"[URL]
  22. Kymlicka, W., "The multiculturalism Backlash. European Discourses, Policies and Practices", pp.33~40 (2010)
  23. Geldof, D., "How migration changes our society", pp.173~176 (2016), Leuven
  24. Vertovec, S., "Superdiversity and its Implications", Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), pp.1024~1054 (2007)
  25. Pinxten, R., "Culture and Politics" (2004)
  26. "See Article 1 from the Convention text"[URL]
  27. "See such authors as Richard Kurin, Laurajane Smith, Chiara Bortolotto, and others", ~
  28. "2013", 96(25)
  29. Rana, J., "Taalcultuur in de superdiverse stad - Over straattaal als immaterieel erfgoed", the theme issue of Volkskunde on intangible cultural heritage and diversity, 116(3), pp.343~356 (2015)
  30. Esposito, R, "Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community", pp.6~ (2010), Stanford
  31. Van der Zeijden, A., "Diversiteit, hybriditeit en de Nationale Inventaris", the theme issue of Volkskunde on intangible cultural heritage and diversity, 116(3), pp.331~342 (2015)
  32. "Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge" (1991)[URL]
  33. Wenger, E., "Cultivating Communities of Practice: a Guide to Managing Knowledge", pp.4~ (2002)
  34. Jacobs, M., "Erfgoedpraktijkgemeenschap. Netwerk, domein en praktijk", faro | tijdschrift over cultureelerfgoed, 1, pp.14~ (2008)
  35. "The Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society" (2005)[URL]
  36. "Best Safeguarding Practices"[URL]
  37. Kurin, R., "Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: a Critical Appraisal", Museum International, 56, pp.70~ (2004)
  38. "The ceiling for the annual number of nomination files that the Convention takes into consideration has systematically declined since the beginning of the Convention’s workings. This is due to, among other things, the administrative burden for the Convention Secretariat versus the shrinking UNESCO budgets in recent years", ~
  39. "See, for example"[URL]
  40. Smith, L., "Uses of Heritage" (2006), Abingdon
  41. "Article 2.2.Text of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage"[URL]
  42. "As a buffer for a (multi-)national nomination, the formula of ‘prior and informed consent’ was already built into the formula. It means that the groups, communities or individuals involved with the ICH elements", practices always need to give their consent. This, however, still does not offer a guarantee or enforcement of realising true, bottom-up developed and driven, participative or cooperative initiatives and propositions
  43. Harrison, R., "See also: Similarly, State Parties might also form hybrid forums for the drawing up of tentative lists, and UNESCO might involve interested groups directly in their own decision making processes regarding nominations", pp.225~ (2013), Critical Approaches
  44. Neyrinck, J., "Beyond the Conventional. How to Foster Co-production for Safeguarding ICH", Tijdschrift over de cultuur van het dagelijks leven, 115(3), pp.319~337 (2014)
  45. "Ethics and Intangible Cultural Heritage"[URL]
  46. "See, among others, the discussions on the occasion of the nomination of the ICH element Torch Festival of the Yi people from China, whereby animal rights were heatedly debated during the meetings of the Intergovernmental Committee in 2014, (9.COM): ITH/14/9.COM/Decisions"[URL]
  47. "See also the speech of the European Commissioner, Androulla Vassiliou, on 28 February 2014, entitled Cultural Diversity, Global Politics and the Role of Europe, in which she stated, inter alia: This is the image that the EU aims to project also on the global scene. The image of a union of diverse countries and people who believe in the power of living and working together in the name of the values that they share and uphold: human dignity, social inclusion, solidarity, tolerance, freedom of expression, respect for human rights and diversity, and dialogue among cultures"[URL]
  48. Bregman, R., "De Geschiedenis van de Vooruitgang", pp.94~95 (2015)
  49. "It is interesting to see that from such a shift or mutation towards a holistic idea of sustainability and a vision of interdependency and connectivity (where culture indissolubly participates) we can also cite the connection with various other international instruments in a policy-minded way: the United Nations Development Programme, the other cultural UNESCO conventions of course, and so forth. From the idea of creating opportunities for new heritage developments in answer to our diversifying and globalising society, for example, the UNESCO Convention is part of protecting and promoting the diversity of cultural expressions, being an instrument to nurture cultural policy and empowerment and getting groups and peoples creatively going with their ICH practices and valuing concrete realisations and productions. It will be an exciting challenge to further establish the connection between the 2003 and 2005 Conventions in the future", ~
  50. "‘Eenperron in de wereld’, like the Dutch sociologist Bram de Swaan, who once expressed this in his volume Perron Nederland", ~ (1991)
  51. Mouffe, C., "The Democratic Paradox", pp.117~ (2000)
  52. Held, D., "Models of Democracy", pp.289~ (2006)
  53. "‘Commons’ are defined by most authors in terms of being a triad: a community ‘natural resource’, the community itself, and a protocol or practice to administer the community natural resource. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri suggest that the common is not only natural resources, such as light, water, fire, etc., but also cultural resources such as language, traditions, knowledge and information, codes, etc., to which no one can claim copyright because they are common property", ~
  54. Litter, J., "Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity", pp.98~ (2008), Hampshire
  55. Neyrinck, "Beyond the Conventional", ~
  56. "See ‘Brokers, facilitators and mediation. Critical Success (F)actors for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage'", Volkskunde. Tijdschrift over de cultuur van het dagelijks leven, 115(3) (2014)
  57. Lahire, B., "Regards Croisés sur les Pratiques culturelles", pp.39~62 (2003)
  58. Goffman, E., "Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience" (1974)
  59. Giele, P., "Being an Artist in Post-Fordist Times", pp.17~44 (2009), Rotterdam
  60. Beck, U., "Der Kosmopolitische Blick, oder: Krieg ist Frieden", pp.25~ (2004), Frankfurt am Main
  61. "For the purposes of this Convention, consideration will be given solely to such intangible cultural heritage as is compatible with existing human rights instruments, as well as with the requirements of mutual respect among communities, groups and individuals, and of sustainable international development: Article 2, Definitions, of the 2003 Convention"[URL]
  62. Shinnie, P. L., "Ancient Nubia" (1996), Kegan Paul International

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)