본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

UNESCO’s Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and the ‘goodness criteria’

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper discusses UNESCO’s 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and specifically the challenges connected to article 2 and the ‘goodness criteria’ included in the Convention’s definition of intangible cultural heritage (ICH). The interpretation of these criteria and the practical implementation of them has proven challenging, and the question of how to handle human rights considerations within the framework of the Convention is an unresolved problem. As the question whether a traditional practice is, for example, discriminatory is often a contentious matter, and as traditional practices sometimes fall within a ‘grey area’, the topic of discrimination tends to be easier to avoid than to address. Another important factor in this is the notion of heritage as ‘good’. In contrast to the World Heritage Convention, the 2003 Convention does not recognise so-called negative, contested or difficult heritage. The inclusion of the goodness criteria can be seen as a fundamentally important statement, assuring that due attention is given to human rights considerations and that discriminatory practices are not to be included. At the same time, the goodness criteria have not been strictly applied, which can be seen, for example, in the handling of gender. In this paper, the author discusses problems related to the current approach to the ‘goodness criteria’, and as a hypothetical exercise, draws up four alternative scenarios.

Abstract

This paper discusses UNESCO’s 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and specifically the challenges connected to article 2 and the ‘goodness criteria’ included in the Convention’s definition of intangible cultural heritage (ICH). The interpretation of these criteria and the practical implementation of them has proven challenging, and the question of how to handle human rights considerations within the framework of the Convention is an unresolved problem. As the question whether a traditional practice is, for example, discriminatory is often a contentious matter, and as traditional practices sometimes fall within a ‘grey area’, the topic of discrimination tends to be easier to avoid than to address. Another important factor in this is the notion of heritage as ‘good’. In contrast to the World Heritage Convention, the 2003 Convention does not recognise so-called negative, contested or difficult heritage. The inclusion of the goodness criteria can be seen as a fundamentally important statement, assuring that due attention is given to human rights considerations and that discriminatory practices are not to be included. At the same time, the goodness criteria have not been strictly applied, which can be seen, for example, in the handling of gender. In this paper, the author discusses problems related to the current approach to the ‘goodness criteria’, and as a hypothetical exercise, draws up four alternative scenarios.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Ali, Saida, "Advocating for sexual rights at the UN: the unfinished business of global development", Reproductive health matters, 23(46), pp.31~37 (2015)[DOI]
  2. Beazley, Olwen, "Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: challenges and approaches: a collection of essays", pp.93~107 (2007), Institute of Art and Law
  3. Blake, Janet, "Gender and heritage: performance, place and politics", pp.207~220 (2018), Routledge
  4. Blake, Janet, "International cultural heritage law" (2015), Oxford University Press
  5. Brolan, Claire E, "Healthcare as a human rights issue: normative profile, conflicts and implementation", pp.293~320 (2017), Transcript
  6. Brumann, Christoph, "Tradition, democracy and the townscape of Kyoto : claiming a right to the past" (2012), Routledge
  7. Ceribašić, Naila, "A feminist critique to knowledge production", pp.53~69 (2014), UniorPress
  8. Deacon, Harriet Jane, "Understanding the work that ‘culture’ does: a comparative perspective on cultural rights provisions in the constitution of Kenya 2010", African studies, 77(2), pp.171~188 (2018)[DOI]
  9. DeWitt, Lindsey E, "Sacred heritage in Japan", pp.65~86 (2020), Routledge
  10. Donnelly, Jack, "Universal human rights in theory and practice" (2003), Cornell University Press
  11. Hafstein, Valdimar Tr, "Intangible heritage", pp.93~111 (2009), Routledge
  12. Inoue, Ritsuko, "Nyonin Kinsei Q&A", pp.62~65 (2005), Buraku Liberation Publishing House
  13. Janse, Helga, "Changes in gender roles within intangible cultural Heritage: a survey of gender roles and gender restrictions within the Yama Hoko Yatai float festivals in Japan", Heritage, 2(3), pp.2090~2110 (2019)[DOI]
  14. Helga Janse, "Intangible cultural heritage and societal gender structures: An interview study focusing on changes in gender roles and gender restrictions in Japanese float festivals", International Journal of Intangible Heritage, (16), pp.47~61 (2021), 국립민속박물관[DOI]
  15. Janse, Helga, "The dynamics of gender roles in intangible cultural heritage: a case study of Japanese Yama Hoko Yatai float festivals", PhD, pp.2020
  16. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara, "Intangible heritage as metacultural production", Museum international, 56(1–2), pp.52~64 (2004)
  17. Kubota, Hiromichi, "ICH contributing to post-disaster rehabilitation", Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific regional workshop on intangible cultural heritage and natural disasters, pp.89~94 (2019), International Research Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific Region
  18. Lancashire, Terence A, "An introduction to Japanese folk performing arts" (2016), Routledge
  19. "Hita Gion, Hatsu no Josei Hayashi Yamaboko de Ensō 300 Nen no Kinsei ni Kazaana" (2017)[URL]
  20. "Josei Hayashi Yamaboko Ue de Hatsu Ensō Hita Gion Sakunen Gōu de Chūshi no Shūdan Kaomise Fukkō Gannen ni Hana" (2018)[URL]
  21. "Nomination File for the Inscription of ‘Yama, Hoko, Yatai, Float Festivals in Japan’ on UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. File No. 01059" (2016)[URL]
  22. Shaheed, Farida, "Gender equality: heritage and creativity", pp.6~8 (2014), UNESCO
  23. Shaheed, Farida, "Interview with Farida Shaheed, Director of Shirkat Gah - Women’s Resource Centre", World heritage review, 78, pp.50~51 (2016)
  24. Smeets, Rieks, "The Routledge companion to intangible cultural heritage", pp.22~39 (2017), Routledge
  25. Smith, Laurajane, "Uses of heritage" (2006), Routledge
  26. "The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women" (1979)[URL]
  27. UNESCO, "Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", UNESCO, ~ (2003)
  28. "Decision of the Intergovernmental Committee: 7.COM 15" (2012)[URL]
  29. "UNESCO’s Promise : Gender Equality – a Global Priority" (2014)[URL]
  30. UNESCO, "Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", UNESCO, ~ (2016)
  31. Report of the Evaluation Body on its work in 2017, "UNESCO", UNESCO, ~ (2017)
  32. UNESCO, "Summary records of the twelfth session of the Committee", UNESCO, ~ (2018)
  33. UNESCO, "Decisions from the fourteenth session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage 2019", UNESCO, ~ (2019)
  34. UNESCO, "Summary records of the fourteenth session of the Committee 2019", UNESCO, ~ (2019)
  35. "Expert meeting in the framework of the global reflection on the listing mechanisms under the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Reflection on the Listing Mechanisms of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage" (2021)[URL]
  36. "Expert meeting in the framework of the global reflection on the listing mechanisms under the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Summary results of the expert survey" (2021)[URL]
  37. UNESCO, "Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", UNESCO, ~ (2022)
  38. Internal Oversight Service Evaluation of UNESCO’s Standard-Setting Work of the Culture Sector: Part I—2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, "UNESCO Internal Oversight Service", UNESCO, ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)