Museums and Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage – Facilitating Participation and Strengthening their Function in Society
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The duality of the nature of heritage - celebrated at the same time for its universal value and for its special meaning and value it significances for local and bearer communities -represents a challenge for its safeguarding and its presentation by museums. Heritage as a universal, global value has been the predominant approach in international cultural policy-setting since the second half of the twentieth century, but its significance to local and bearer communities is now increasingly well understood. This duality has been particularly challenging with regard to implementing UNESCO’s International Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003): With the adoption of this treaty, the policy- and law-making paradigm has shifted from valuing monuments, sites, artefacts and other objects to safeguarding a living heritage that is primarily located in the skills, knowledge and know-how of contemporary human beings. With regard to the role of museums in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (‘ICH’), a document of great significance is the Recommendation concerning the Protection and Promotion of Museums and Collections, their Diversity and their Role in Society adopted by UNESCO General Conference in 2015. This is an innovative document that recognizes not only the great importance of the preservation, study and transmission of cultural heritage, both tangible and intangible, for all societies, social cohesion and sustainable development, but also the central role that can be played by museums in helping to achieve this. Recently, the potential of cultural heritage has increasingly been acknowledged in international policy- and law-making as a social, cultural and, at times, economic resource for communities, in particular the intangible heritage. Moreover, international law has now called for a greater democratization of the heritage protection paradigm, in particular through community participation in its identification, safeguarding and management. This article examines the aforementioned shift from an emphasis on global to local heritage and the role museums can play in this with regard to safeguarding intangible aspects of heritage.
Abstract
The duality of the nature of heritage - celebrated at the same time for its universal value and for its special meaning and value it significances for local and bearer communities -represents a challenge for its safeguarding and its presentation by museums. Heritage as a universal, global value has been the predominant approach in international cultural policy-setting since the second half of the twentieth century, but its significance to local and bearer communities is now increasingly well understood. This duality has been particularly challenging with regard to implementing UNESCO’s International Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003): With the adoption of this treaty, the policy- and law-making paradigm has shifted from valuing monuments, sites, artefacts and other objects to safeguarding a living heritage that is primarily located in the skills, knowledge and know-how of contemporary human beings. With regard to the role of museums in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (‘ICH’), a document of great significance is the Recommendation concerning the Protection and Promotion of Museums and Collections, their Diversity and their Role in Society adopted by UNESCO General Conference in 2015. This is an innovative document that recognizes not only the great importance of the preservation, study and transmission of cultural heritage, both tangible and intangible, for all societies, social cohesion and sustainable development, but also the central role that can be played by museums in helping to achieve this. Recently, the potential of cultural heritage has increasingly been acknowledged in international policy- and law-making as a social, cultural and, at times, economic resource for communities, in particular the intangible heritage. Moreover, international law has now called for a greater democratization of the heritage protection paradigm, in particular through community participation in its identification, safeguarding and management. This article examines the aforementioned shift from an emphasis on global to local heritage and the role museums can play in this with regard to safeguarding intangible aspects of heritage.
참고문헌 (30)
- Arantes, A. A., "Diversity, Heritage and Cultural Practices", Theory Culture Society, 24, pp.290~296 (2007)
- Blake, J., "Commentary on the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", Leicester, Institute of Art & Law (2006)
- Blake, J., "International Cultural Heritage Law", Oxford University Press
- Blake, Janet, "Intangible Cultural Heritage" (2016), Routledge
- Cameron, C., "'Evolution of the Application of ‘Outstanding Universal Value’ for Cultural and Natural Heritage", Special Expert Meeting of the World Heritage Convention on The Concept of Outstanding Universal Value (2005)
- Council of Europe, "Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society", ~ (2005)
- Croatia, "Periodic Report on the Implementation of the Convention and the Status of Elements Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity", adopted by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Seventh Session in Paris, ~ (2012)
- Díaz-Andreu, M., "History, Identity and the Question of Britain" (2004), Palgrave
- Hungary, "Periodic Report on the Implementation of the Convention and the Status of Elements Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity", adopted by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Eighth Session in Baku, ~ (2013)
- Kurin, Richard, "Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: a Critical Appraisal", Museum International, 221(2), pp.66~77 (2004)
- Richard Kurin, "Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: Key Factors in Implementing the 2003 Convention*", International Journal of Intangible Heritage, (2), pp.9~20 (2007), 국립민속박물관
- Vicki León, "Uppity Women of Ancient Times" (2011), Conari Press
- Lithuania, "Periodic Report on the Implementation of the Convention and the Status of Elements Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity", adopted by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Seventh Session in Paris, ~ (2012)
- Lixinski, Lucas, "Intangible Cultural Heritage in International Law" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Report of the London Museum Hub Project to Record Refugee Heritage (2004-6), "London Museum Hub", London Museum Hub, ~ (2006)
- Lowenthal, David, "The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History" (1997), Viking
- Lydon, Jane, "Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology" (2010), Left Coast Press
- Shyllon, Folarin, "Cultural Rights and Wrongs" (1998), UNESCO Publishing and Leicester, Institute of Art and Law
- Tekin, G., "Transforming museology and learning in museums: Ankara intangible cultural heritage museum", Milli Egitim, 1(214), pp.155~166 (2017)
- Evaluation of UNESCO’s Standard-setting Work of the Culture Sector, Part I—2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, "Torggler, B.", UNESCO, ~ (2014)
- Turkey, "Periodic Report on the Implementation of the Convention and the Status of Elements Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity", adopted by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Eighth Session in Baku, ~ (2013)
- United Nations, "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights", ~ (1996)
- United Nations, "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", ~ (1966)
- UNESCO, "Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity", ~ (2001)
- UNESCO, "Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", ~ (2003)
- UNESCO, "Synthetic Report submitted to the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Seventh session held in UNESCO Headquarters", UNESCO Doc.ITH, 7.COM, pp.6, 2012[DOI]
- UNESCO, "Synthetic Report submitted to the Intergovernmental Committee for the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity at its Eighth Session in Baku", UNESCO Doc. (ITH, 8.COM, pp.6.a, 2013[DOI]
- UNESCO., "Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage", UNESCO, 2008, amended in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016, ~ (2016)
- Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, "International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Wagener, Noé, "Isabelle, Mimesis – Towards International Normativity between Mimetism and Dissemination" (2016), Editions A. Pedone