使動과 受動의 相關性에 基盤을 둔 現代中國語 結果補語構造와 可能補語構造의 統辭的 變形 關係 硏究
A Study on the Structural Connection between Complement of Result and Potential-Marking Complement of Modern Chinese based on the Relevance between Causativity and Passivity
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural connection between Complement of Result (CR) and Potential-Marking Complement (PMC) in Modern Chinese based on the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity. This research found that the only difference was the addition of the mark de between PMC and CR. Also, this paper will suggest that the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity is a clue to understanding the close structural connection between these two structures. In particular, this paper includes a cross-linguistic analysis of the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity, resulting in the phenomenon that these two categories are expressed as the same form. It has already been suggested that there is causativity in CR and that there is passivity in PMC, so it is the hope of this paper that the result that causativity and passivity are related both semantically and syntactically will clarify the structural connection between CR and PMC. This paper is formed by the following discussions: (1) to examine the common semantic feature between causativity and passivity; (2) to analyze the causativity of CR and the passivity of PMC; (3) to examine the functional division made by the relevance between CR and PMC by comparative analysis of these two complement constructions.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the structural connection between Complement of Result (CR) and Potential-Marking Complement (PMC) in Modern Chinese based on the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity. This research found that the only difference was the addition of the mark de between PMC and CR. Also, this paper will suggest that the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity is a clue to understanding the close structural connection between these two structures. In particular, this paper includes a cross-linguistic analysis of the semantic relevance between causativity and passivity, resulting in the phenomenon that these two categories are expressed as the same form. It has already been suggested that there is causativity in CR and that there is passivity in PMC, so it is the hope of this paper that the result that causativity and passivity are related both semantically and syntactically will clarify the structural connection between CR and PMC. This paper is formed by the following discussions: (1) to examine the common semantic feature between causativity and passivity; (2) to analyze the causativity of CR and the passivity of PMC; (3) to examine the functional division made by the relevance between CR and PMC by comparative analysis of these two complement constructions.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김성주, "한국어의 사동" (2003), 한국문화사
- 김윤정, "?“能”、?果??、可能??: 三?表示“可能”的??所表?的三?“?”?, 『??(朝)?????究』 Vol.1, 延?, 延?大?出版社", ~ (2005)
- 김윤정, "가능보어의 수동자 중심 양상 의미에 대한 인지적 분석", 박사, pp.2006
- 김윤정, "현대중국어 수동자 중심성 형태범주 연구 - 결과보어의 재조명 -", 중국학연구, 43(43), pp.49~72 (2008), 중국학연구회
- 김윤정, "현대중국어 사동구문 비교 분석 연구", 중어중문학, 42 (2008)
- 김종호, "현대 중국어 문장수식부사의 서법성고", 중어중문학, 17 (1995)
- 박정운, "Morphological Causatives in Korean: Problems in Grammatical Polysemy and Constructional Relations" (1994), 태학사
- 이상억, "국어의 사동?피동 구문 연구" (1999), 집문당
- ?守信, "???使成式的???", 外言, 3 (1991)
- 房玉?, "?用???法(修?本)" (2003), 北京大?出版社
- 郭姝慧, "??代??致使句式?究?", 言文字用, 3 (2005)
- 胡竹安, "近代???究" (1992), 商?印??
- "?用?代???法(增?本)" (2004), 商?印??
- 衫村博文, "?V得C、能VC、能V得C?", 6 (1982)
- 邵敬敏, "致使把字句”和“省?被字句", 4 (2005)
- ??信, "???史?法要略" (1992), 復旦大?出版社
- 田化?, "?于可能??的??", 安, 4 (2001)
- 王?, "?致使??角下的“把”字句及其英?表?形式?", 外究, 1 (2008)
- 王力, "???史稿" (1996), 中??局
- ?向?, "'把' 字句的致使性解??", 世界, 2 (2004)
- ?永新, "???法?要" (1997), 北京?言文化出版社
- 朱德熙, "?代???法?究" (1997), 商?印??
- ?京?, "?心理???英?典型使役化???", 四川外月, 5 (2004)
- ?豫峰, "??析??式?合??成的致使??句?", 6 (2006)
- ?豫峰, "??于?代??致使?的思考?", 6 (2007)
- 周?, "?? '把' 字句的正向致使性?句式特征?", 云刊, 1 (2006)
- 周?, "?'使' 字句? '把' 字句致使表??同分析?", 吉林省育院, 2 (2006)
- ?洪民, "?致使?“把”字句的???用分析?", 言, 1 (2001)
- Bybee, Joan L., "Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form" (1985), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Nida, Eugene A., "Morphology: The descriptive analysis or words" (1957), University of Michigan Press
- Saeed, John I., "Semantics" (2000), Basil Blackwell
- "CCL?料?", ~