본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대중국어 동결식의 문형 분포와 의미 구조 — ≪動詞-結果補語搭配詞典≫에 대한 정량 분석을 기반으로

The Sentence Distribution and Semantic Structure of VRCs in Modern Chinese: Based on a Quantitative Analysis of A Dictionary of Chinese Verb-Resultative Complement Phrases

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Traditionally, the Verb Resultative Compounds (VRCs) used in SVCO transitive constructions, which express causal meaning, have been regarded as typical usages. However, in this paper as a result of quantitative analysis focusing on the example sentences in A Dictionary of Chinese Verb-Resultative Complement Phrases(≪漢語動詞-結果補語搭配典詞≫), the causal meaning of VRCs, which has been considered a typical semantic structure, is realized through special ‘Ba (把)’ constructions, which emphasize Agentivity. In addition, intransitive constructions or SVCs, which express change of state (non-causal) meaning, have been widely used based on the combination of various Verbs and Complements (Buyu). On the other hand, SVCOs or unmarked transitive constructions reveal the very limited usages of Complements such as ‘Chu (出)’, ‘Gei (給)’, and ‘Zai (在)’, and so on. Based on this, it has been possible to review the basic and dominant semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs. In contrast to the existing conception which regards the causal-transitive case as the typical semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs, it has been confirmed that the change of state (non-causal)-intransitive or SVC case is the dominant semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs. This is because of the specificity of VRCs, which entails that the Patient indicated by the Complement (Buyu) should be prominent and be realized syntactically.

Abstract

Traditionally, the Verb Resultative Compounds (VRCs) used in SVCO transitive constructions, which express causal meaning, have been regarded as typical usages. However, in this paper as a result of quantitative analysis focusing on the example sentences in A Dictionary of Chinese Verb-Resultative Complement Phrases(≪漢語動詞-結果補語搭配典詞≫), the causal meaning of VRCs, which has been considered a typical semantic structure, is realized through special ‘Ba (把)’ constructions, which emphasize Agentivity. In addition, intransitive constructions or SVCs, which express change of state (non-causal) meaning, have been widely used based on the combination of various Verbs and Complements (Buyu). On the other hand, SVCOs or unmarked transitive constructions reveal the very limited usages of Complements such as ‘Chu (出)’, ‘Gei (給)’, and ‘Zai (在)’, and so on. Based on this, it has been possible to review the basic and dominant semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs. In contrast to the existing conception which regards the causal-transitive case as the typical semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs, it has been confirmed that the change of state (non-causal)-intransitive or SVC case is the dominant semantic-syntactical structure of VRCs. This is because of the specificity of VRCs, which entails that the Patient indicated by the Complement (Buyu) should be prominent and be realized syntactically.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김윤정, "현대중국어 수동자 중심성 형태범주 연구 - 결과보어의 재조명 -", 중국학연구, (43), pp.49~72 (2008), 중국학연구회
  2. 오유정, "중국어 동결식의 논항 실현과 사역 연쇄", 언어와 정보 사회, 40, pp.301~324 (2020), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  3. 조경환, "處置, 致使, 使役", 중국학논총, (68), pp.55~79 (2020), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  4. 최규발, "중국어 결과보어구문의 보어위치이동과 빈어문제", 중국학논총, (12), pp.1~18 (1999), 중국학연구소
  5. 최규발, "현대 중국어 결과보어구문의 빈어 출현 제약", 중국어문논총, 25, pp.81~104 (2003), 중국어문연구회
  6. 최규발, "현대중국어 결과보어의 결과성, 타동성과 사동성", 중국어문학논집, (109), pp.35~62 (2018), 중국어문학연구회
  7. 최규발, "把字句와 결과보어", 중국어문논총, (33), pp.77~106 (2007), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  8. 郭銳, "現代漢語配價語法研究" (1995), 北京大學出版社
  9. 戴耀晶, "試說漢語重動句的語法價值", 漢語學習, (2) (1998)
  10. 李勁榮, "“賓補爭動”的焦點實質", 漢語學習, (5) (2017)
  11. 李臨定, "現代漢語句型" (1986), 商務印書館
  12. 李小龍, "對述結式帶賓語功能的考察", 漢語學習, (5) (1994)
  13. 陸儉明, "“VA了”述補結構語義分析", 漢語學習, (1) (1990)
  14. 施春宏, "漢語動結式的句法語義研究" (2008), 北京語言大學出版社
  15. 宋文輝, "動結式在幾個句式中的分布", 語文研究, (3) (2004)
  16. 宋文輝, "關於賓語必須前置的動結式", 漢語學報, (4) (2006)
  17. 王紅旗, "動結式述補結構在把字句和重動句中的分布", 語文研究, (1) (2001)
  18. 王硯農, "漢語動詞-結果補語搭配詞典" (1987), 北京語言學院出版社
  19. 吳爲善, "自致使義動結構式“NP+VR”考察", 漢語學習, (6) (2010)
  20. 吳有晶, "致使", 非致使交替以及反致使化研究——以現代漢語動介式爲例, 復旦大學, 2017
  21. 延俊榮, "動結式“V+Rv”帶賓語的標記模式", 語文研究, 81(4) (2001)
  22. 延俊榮, "動結式“V+Rv”帶賓語情況考察", 漢語學習, (5) (2002)
  23. 張黎, "漢語“動作—結果”的句法呈現及其認知類型學的解釋", 對外漢語研究, (00) (2010)
  24. 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1982), 商務印書館
  25. Croft, W., "Verbs : Aspect and Causal Structure" (2012), Oxford University Press
  26. Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2) (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)