본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어권 한국어학습자의 ‘-었-’ 사용 오류의 특성

An Analysis on Characteristics of ‘-ess-’ errors in Chinese speakers of Korean learners

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study aims to explain the characteristics of ‘-ess-’ errors in Chinese learners of Korean language through the comparison of ‘-ess-’ errors in non-Chinese learners. This study has found that Chinese learners, like non-Chinese learners, understand the function of '-ess-' to be a dietic function to represent the past tense. In Korean, there is a phenomenon in which it is permitted for a non-past tense form to be unrealized. Thus, both in Chinese learners and in non-Chinese learners, such phenomenon results in an interference where the ‘-ess-' form is often omitted in past tense, as well. In particular, Chinese learners showed a high frequency of erroneously omitting ‘-ess-' immediately preceding sentential final endings. This appears to be a result of conflation of ‘-ess-' with the Chinese ‘了’ by Chinese learners, thereby not realizing the ‘-ess-' in stative verb predicates or negative predicates. On the other hand, non-Chinese learners showed high frequency of erroneously including ‘-ess-' immediately preceding non-final sentential endings. This appears to be a result of a negative transfer of the characteristics of non-Chinese learners’mother tongues that require accordance of past tense in subordinate clauses when the main clause is in the past tense. Therefore, the usage error of ‘-ess-' in Korean students shows negative transfer in not only Chinese learners but also in non-Chinese learners, and that there is a negative transfer even within Korean, the target language. In conclusion, this study proposes a pedagogical method that can prevent ‘–ess-’ use of Korean learners from the errors by interlingual transfer as well as intralingual transfer.

Abstract

This study aims to explain the characteristics of ‘-ess-’ errors in Chinese learners of Korean language through the comparison of ‘-ess-’ errors in non-Chinese learners. This study has found that Chinese learners, like non-Chinese learners, understand the function of '-ess-' to be a dietic function to represent the past tense. In Korean, there is a phenomenon in which it is permitted for a non-past tense form to be unrealized. Thus, both in Chinese learners and in non-Chinese learners, such phenomenon results in an interference where the ‘-ess-' form is often omitted in past tense, as well. In particular, Chinese learners showed a high frequency of erroneously omitting ‘-ess-' immediately preceding sentential final endings. This appears to be a result of conflation of ‘-ess-' with the Chinese ‘了’ by Chinese learners, thereby not realizing the ‘-ess-' in stative verb predicates or negative predicates. On the other hand, non-Chinese learners showed high frequency of erroneously including ‘-ess-' immediately preceding non-final sentential endings. This appears to be a result of a negative transfer of the characteristics of non-Chinese learners’mother tongues that require accordance of past tense in subordinate clauses when the main clause is in the past tense. Therefore, the usage error of ‘-ess-' in Korean students shows negative transfer in not only Chinese learners but also in non-Chinese learners, and that there is a negative transfer even within Korean, the target language. In conclusion, this study proposes a pedagogical method that can prevent ‘–ess-’ use of Korean learners from the errors by interlingual transfer as well as intralingual transfer.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 고영근, "한국어의 시제 서법 동작상" (2007), 태학사
  2. 김미옥, "한국어 학습에 나타난 오류 분석", 한국말교육, 5 (1994), 국제한국어교육학회
  3. 김성란, "중국어권 학습자의 과거 시제 사용 오류 분석 ― "-았-"을 중심으로", 문법 교육, 13, pp.137~156 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
  4. 김유미, "외국어로서의 한국어 학습자 말뭉치를 이용한 오류 분석", 석사, pp.2000
  5. 김홍실, "한국어의 ‘-었-’과 중국어의 ‘了’의 대조 연구", 이중언어학, (38), pp.123~147 (2008), 이중언어학회
  6. 남기심, "국어문법의 시제에 관한 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
  7. 남승호, "한국어 술어의 상 분류 기준”, 의미구조와 통사구조, 그리고 그너머", pp.259~286 (2005), 한국문화사
  8. 루시언 브라운, "한국어 학습자들의 동사 시제상 습득 양상에 대한 실험적 연구: 진행형 “-고 있다”를 중심으로", 한국어교육, 21(1), pp.151~173 (2010), 국제한국어교육학회
  9. 박선희, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 진행상 습득 연구", 이중언어학, (41), pp.139~178 (2009), 이중언어학회
  10. 박선희, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 과거시제 습득 연구", 한국어교육, 20(3), pp.79~110 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회
  11. 박수진, "중급 한국어 학습자의 서사 담화 연구 -서사 담화 구조에 따른 시제 사용 양상을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (46), pp.131~157 (2011), 이중언어학회
  12. 이정희, "한국어 학습자의 시제 오류 연구", 이중언어학, (18), pp.259~278 (2001), 이중언어학회
  13. 이해영, "한국어 학습자의 시제표현 문법항목 발달패턴 연구 -구어 발화 자료 분석을 토대로-", 이중언어학, (22), pp.271~300 (2003), 이중언어학회
  14. 전은주, "한국어 학습시 나타나는 학습자의 모국어 영향", 한국말 교육, 5 (1994), 국제한국어교육학회
  15. 정희자, "The Function of Tense in Korean Narrative", 언어, 13(2), pp.363~402 (1988), 한국언어학회
  16. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form,Meaning, and Use" (2000), Blackwell
  17. Ellis, R., "Classroom second language development" (1984), Pergamon
  18. O'Grady, W., "The Problem of Verbal Inflection in Second Language Acquisition", Proceedings of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Liguistics, pp.1~21 (2006)
  19. Pinker, S., "The past and future of the past tense", Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, pp.456~463 (2002)
  20. Vendler, Z., , The Philosophical Review, 66(2), pp.143~160 (1957)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)