본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신탁제도를 활용한 재산 관리방법의 논의 - 유언신탁 및 유언대용신탁을 중심으로 -

Discussion of the Asset Management Using a Trust - Case of will trust and substitution trust for will -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to find the eligibilities not only to utilize the Will Trust and the Substitution Trust for Will as an asset management, but also to supplement the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will), will, inheritance and system of a legal portion of an heir in terms of the policy. This study concludes that the Will Trust (or the Substitution Trust for Will) is eligible to apply in Korea on the basis of the several results : i) the revised bill has strong legislative basis, which clearly defines the Will Trust including the Substitution Trust for Will, ii) the senior population over 65 year-old tends to increase steadily, iii) the tendency to bequeath a inheritance to family including sons and daughters has been settled down for a long time. The foreign cases support the results : i) in the US, the Will Trust and the Revocable Trust have been used as a way of the inheritance, ii) in Japan, the number of the Will Trust has increased since the New Trust Act was activated. However, we find that the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) has not been apparent in terms of its interpretation to apply for the inheritance of the civil law, the will and system of a legal portion of an heir and asset management. First, it has not been clear when the Will Trust including the Substitution Trust for Will would be activated. Second, it has not uncovered how the Substitution Trust for Will has related to the law in terms of whether or not the Trustee is alive. Third, the duration for the Serial Trust for the beneficiary is not apparent. Last, the relationship with the legal portion of an heir is most important. That is, once the legal portion of an heir is accepted, the inheritance delivered by a will would return to a claimant of a legal portion of an heir, which may lead to the result against the intention of a testator. The Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) is not very different. Hence, the earlier the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) is legislated or makes the legislative issues clear, the more important role it can play as a tool for asset management in terms of the eligibility and the clarification of the relationship between the civil law and the trust law.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find the eligibilities not only to utilize the Will Trust and the Substitution Trust for Will as an asset management, but also to supplement the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will), will, inheritance and system of a legal portion of an heir in terms of the policy. This study concludes that the Will Trust (or the Substitution Trust for Will) is eligible to apply in Korea on the basis of the several results : i) the revised bill has strong legislative basis, which clearly defines the Will Trust including the Substitution Trust for Will, ii) the senior population over 65 year-old tends to increase steadily, iii) the tendency to bequeath a inheritance to family including sons and daughters has been settled down for a long time. The foreign cases support the results : i) in the US, the Will Trust and the Revocable Trust have been used as a way of the inheritance, ii) in Japan, the number of the Will Trust has increased since the New Trust Act was activated. However, we find that the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) has not been apparent in terms of its interpretation to apply for the inheritance of the civil law, the will and system of a legal portion of an heir and asset management. First, it has not been clear when the Will Trust including the Substitution Trust for Will would be activated. Second, it has not uncovered how the Substitution Trust for Will has related to the law in terms of whether or not the Trustee is alive. Third, the duration for the Serial Trust for the beneficiary is not apparent. Last, the relationship with the legal portion of an heir is most important. That is, once the legal portion of an heir is accepted, the inheritance delivered by a will would return to a claimant of a legal portion of an heir, which may lead to the result against the intention of a testator. The Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) is not very different. Hence, the earlier the Will Trust (including the Substitution Trust for Will) is legislated or makes the legislative issues clear, the more important role it can play as a tool for asset management in terms of the eligibility and the clarification of the relationship between the civil law and the trust law.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김주수, "친족ㆍ상속법 -가족법-" (2006), 법문사
  2. 김용한, "친족상속" (2003), 박영사
  3. 大塚正民, "현대미국신탁법" (2005), 세창출판사
  4. 이재욱, "신탁법 해설" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
  5. 최동식, "신탁법" (2006), 법문사
  6. 최수정, "일본 신신탁법" (2007), 진원사
  7. 한봉희, "가족법" (2005), 도서출판 푸른세상
  8. 홍유석, "신탁법" (1990), 법문사
  9. 홍유석, "신탁의 이론과 실무(전정판)" (1994), 경진사
  10. 김기영, "영국의 유언상속제도에 관한 소고", 연세법학회, 2 (1992), 연세대학교
  11. 김기영, "영국의 유언제도에 관한 소고", 가족법연구, (11) (1997), 한국가족법학회
  12. 김성필, "신탁법리의 사법적 체계화에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1997
  13. 박운길, "遺留分制度에 관한 小考", 법학연구, (30), pp.133~155 (2008), 한국법학회
  14. 서영미, "새롭게 주목받고 있는 실버금융상품, 유언신탁(遺言信託)", 월간하나금융 (2010), 하나금융경영연구소
  15. 양창수, "유언상속의 초기 역사 「고대법(Ancient Law) 제6장」", 법학, 49(3) (2008), 서울대학교
  16. 임채웅, "遺言信託 및 遺言代用信託의 硏究", 인권과 정의, (397), pp.124~143 (2009), 대한변호사협회
  17. 장현옥, "부동산신탁에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
  18. 장현옥, "신탁에 관한 연구 -특히 신탁의 연혁을 중심으로-", 강원법학, 16 (2003), 강원대학교 비교법학연구소
  19. 전혜정, "민법상 유언상속에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(3), pp.151~180 (2006), 한국가족법학회
  20. 정소민, "신탁의 설정에 관한 소고 - 공통참조기준초안(Draft Common Frame of Reference)을 중심으로 -", 외법논집, 33(3), pp.49~79 (2009), 법학연구소
  21. 정진명, "사법상의 철회에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 26(1), pp.45~80 (2009), 한국재산법학회
  22. 최수정, "신탁계약의 법적 성질", 민사법학, 45(1), pp.477~500 (2009), 한국민사법학회
  23. 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁", 민사법학, (34), pp.565~602 (2006), 한국민사법학회
  24. 최수정, "일본 신탁법개정안으로부터의 시사", 서강법학, 8 (2006), 서강대학교법학연구소
  25. 현소혜, "유언의 보충적 해석", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.111~150 (2008), 한국가족법학회
  26. 현소혜, "로마법상 유언의 해석에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (41), pp.253~288 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  27. "매일경제신문, 2008년 11월 1일자", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)