유언대용신탁의 현황과 과제 ―유류분과의 관계를 중심으로―
The Current Status and Tasks of the Living Trust ―Focusing on the Relationship with the Forced Share―
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Compared to the will, the trust system as the means of inheritance in Korea has not been used much due to the lack of history or publicity. However, the real reason for preventing the use of the living trust is that it cannot solve the problem regarding forced share system, nor does it have any tax benefits. Eventually, the biggest obstacles revitalizing the trust system as a new method of the property succession is the legal issues surrounding forced share and tax. However, Korean District Court decision was recently issued to the living trust that the entrusted property may not be subject to a claim of return for forced share. The court decision shocked not only the legal profession but also the socio-economic cummunity. In advance, this study explains the current status of the living trust, and look into the relationship between the living trust and the issues of the forced share. With regard to the current status of the living trust, this study introduces the first litigation case and the advisory case related. In addition, this study examines the theories and the recent court decision of whether trust assets can be included in the basic property for the calculation of forced share of heirs. In order for the trust to function properly as a new means of inheritance, it must address limitations and opacity inherent in forced share system and tax. It is hoped that the government will establish socio-economic foundation for carrying out the natural function of the trust which is a method of property succession.
Abstract
Compared to the will, the trust system as the means of inheritance in Korea has not been used much due to the lack of history or publicity. However, the real reason for preventing the use of the living trust is that it cannot solve the problem regarding forced share system, nor does it have any tax benefits. Eventually, the biggest obstacles revitalizing the trust system as a new method of the property succession is the legal issues surrounding forced share and tax. However, Korean District Court decision was recently issued to the living trust that the entrusted property may not be subject to a claim of return for forced share. The court decision shocked not only the legal profession but also the socio-economic cummunity. In advance, this study explains the current status of the living trust, and look into the relationship between the living trust and the issues of the forced share. With regard to the current status of the living trust, this study introduces the first litigation case and the advisory case related. In addition, this study examines the theories and the recent court decision of whether trust assets can be included in the basic property for the calculation of forced share of heirs. In order for the trust to function properly as a new means of inheritance, it must address limitations and opacity inherent in forced share system and tax. It is hoped that the government will establish socio-economic foundation for carrying out the natural function of the trust which is a method of property succession.
참고문헌 (19)
- 광장신탁법연구회, "주석신탁법" (2013), 박영사
- 김상훈, "미국상속법" (2012), 세창출판사
- 법무부, "신탁법해설" (2012), 법조협회
- 오영걸, "신탁법" (2021), 박영사
- 김상훈, "미국의 상속설계(Estate Planning)와 관련한 신탁 활용 현황―캘리포니아주를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.351~366 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 김상훈, "유언대용신탁을 활용한 가업승계", 기업법연구, 29(4), pp.9~34 (2015), 한국기업법학회
- 김상훈, "새로운 재산승계수단으로서의 보험금청구권신탁", 사법, 1(41), pp.3~44 (2017), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 박근웅, "상속에 의한 기업승계의 몇 가지 문제", 비교사법, 27(3), pp.65~104 (2020), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 엄복현, "신탁제도와 유류분반환청구권과의 관계", 가족법연구, 32(3), pp.163~184 (2018), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 오영걸, , 2020년 한국가족법학회·서울대 아시아태평양법연구소 공동학술대회 토론문 (2020)
- 이계정, "고령사회에서의 신탁의 역할 - 신탁의 공익적 기능에 주목하여-", 서울대학교 법학, 61(4), pp.73~123 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이화연, "재산승계수단으로서의 신탁과 상속―신탁의 재산승계수단으로서의 활용가능성과 유류분반환의 문제를 중심으로", 사법논집, (65) (2017)
- 임채웅, "신탁과 유류분에 관한 연구", 사법, 1(41), pp.129~150 (2017), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 정구태, "신탁제도를 통한 재산승계 -유류분과의 관계를 중심으로-", 인문사회 21, 9(1), pp.657~666 (2018), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- 정소민, "BFL 총서 10 신탁법의 쟁점(제2권)" (2015), 서울대학교 금융법센터
- 최수정, "개정신탁법상의 재산승계제도 -유언대용신탁과 수익자연속신탁을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.65~87 (2011), 법학연구소
- 최수정, "유언대용신탁과 유류분의 관계- 한국과 일본의 하급심판결에 대한 비교검토를 통하여 -", 인권과 정의, (493), pp.174~196 (2020), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 최준규, "유류분과 신탁", 사법, 1(34), pp.235~273 (2015), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 현소혜, "유산기부 활성화를 위한 유류분 제도의 개선방안 - 영국, 미국 사례로부터의 시사점을 포함하여 -", 외법논집, 43(2), pp.49~70 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
