福祉型信託 導入을 통한 民事信託의 活性化 - 受益者連續信託을 中心으로 -
The revitalization of the Civil Trust through the introduction of welfare type trust - With a Particular Emphasis on the trust for beneficiary in succession -
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Ministry of Justice has prepared an entire amendment of the Trust Act in recent years. Even though the Trust Act was enacted in 1961 and revised somewhat since then, it has been applied infrequently. One of the biggest reasons why the Act has been rarely used would be the rigid rules incompatible with our reality. For this reason jurists and academia call for the amendment of the Trust Act from early. In the draft of the Act, it includes a concept of innovative system for invigoration of the Civil Trust. Articles 59 and 60 of the draft are the one reflected to the above concept and provide the Trust instead of a testament and the trust for beneficiary in succession, respectively. This paper, however, points out the subject matter of the latter, the trust for beneficiary in succession, in particular. The trust for beneficiary in succession defines a system that the next beneficiary acquires the right of the previous beneficiary, after the previous beneficiary dies. In this paper a relation with the civilly inheritance system in the trust for beneficiary in succession and a suitability are judged in particular. It is criticized as being not logically correct with the civil law and the fundamental of the law of inheritance, which benefit is allowed by the trust for beneficiary in succession. For Application of the trust for beneficiary in succession without a problem with the fundamental of the law of inheritance a construction of this Act is examined thoroughly.
Abstract
The Ministry of Justice has prepared an entire amendment of the Trust Act in recent years. Even though the Trust Act was enacted in 1961 and revised somewhat since then, it has been applied infrequently. One of the biggest reasons why the Act has been rarely used would be the rigid rules incompatible with our reality. For this reason jurists and academia call for the amendment of the Trust Act from early. In the draft of the Act, it includes a concept of innovative system for invigoration of the Civil Trust. Articles 59 and 60 of the draft are the one reflected to the above concept and provide the Trust instead of a testament and the trust for beneficiary in succession, respectively. This paper, however, points out the subject matter of the latter, the trust for beneficiary in succession, in particular. The trust for beneficiary in succession defines a system that the next beneficiary acquires the right of the previous beneficiary, after the previous beneficiary dies. In this paper a relation with the civilly inheritance system in the trust for beneficiary in succession and a suitability are judged in particular. It is criticized as being not logically correct with the civil law and the fundamental of the law of inheritance, which benefit is allowed by the trust for beneficiary in succession. For Application of the trust for beneficiary in succession without a problem with the fundamental of the law of inheritance a construction of this Act is examined thoroughly.
참고문헌 (38)
- 李重基, "신탁법" (2007), 三宇社
- 최수정, "일본 신신탁법" (2007), 진원사
- 현병철, "신탁과 법인의 역사(Trust und Korporation)" (2007), 세창출판사
- 심인숙, "수익권에 관한 ｢신탁법｣ 개정시안", 선진상사법률연구, (48), pp.53~91 (2009), 법무부
- 안성포, "법인관련법과 신탁법-기업형태로서의 사업신탁을 중심으로-: 단체법 및 법인관계법의 이유와 정", 한국상사법학회·한국민사법학회·한국비교사법학회 공동학술대회 발표집 (2008), 한국상사법학회·한국민사법학회·한국비교사법학회
- 안성포, "신탁법의 개정방향 -법무부 2009년 신탁법 전면개정안을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.193~235 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이근영, "信託法上 受益者의 受益權의 意義와 受益權抛棄― 신탁법 제42조 제3항을 중심으로 ―", 민사법학, (30), pp.183~210 (2005), 한국민사법학회
- 이근영, "信託受益權의 消滅時效", 재산법연구, 24(1), pp.307~345 (2007), 한국재산법학회
- 李根瑩, "信託受益者의 報償請求權에 관한 考察", 財産法硏究, 26(3) (2010), 韓國財産法學會
- 李重基, "信託法理에 의한 財産權의 保護", 省谷論叢, 29(2) (1998), 省谷學術文化財團
- 임채웅, "遺言信託 및 遺言代用信託의 硏究", 인권과 정의, (397), pp.124~143 (2009), 대한변호사협회
- 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁", 민사법학, (34), pp.565~602 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 崔秀貞, "일본 신탁법개정안으로부터의 示唆-민사신탁을 주로 염두에 둔 규율관계를 중심으로-", 서강법학, 8 (2006), 서강대학교 법학연구소
- 崔鉉泰, "信託受益者의 權利保護에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.2009
- 能見善久, "現代信託法" (2004), 有斐閣
- 法務省 民事局 參事官室, "信託法改正要綱試案 補足說明", ~ (2005)
- 四宮和夫, "信託法" (1989), 有斐閣
- 寺本昌広, "(新しい)信託法" (2007), 商事法務
- 星野 豊, "信託法理論の形成と應用" (2004), 信山社
- 新井 誠 監修, "コンメンタ―ル信託法" (2008), ぎょうせい
- 新井 誠, "高齡社会と信託" (1995), 有斐閣
- 新井 誠, "成年後見法と信託法" (2005), 有斐閣
- 新井 誠, "財産管理制度と民法․信託法" (1999), 有斐閣
- 中川善之助, "相續法" (2002), 有斐閣
- 大村敦志, "'後継ぎ遺贈'論の可能性. in: 信託取引と民法法理" (2004), 有斐閣
- 米倉 明, "信託による後継ぎ遺贈の可能性-受益者連続の解釋論的根拠づけ", ジュリスト, (1162) (1999), 有斐閣
- 石井 崇, "特別障害者扶養信託についてー信託受益權を中心として", 信託法硏究, (4) (1980), 信託法硏究會
- 星田 實, "高齡社會における個人財産の管理,移轉にかかる信託の活用", 信託, (191) (1997), 信託協会
- 細川昭子, "米国における家族信託の実情及び担い手規制と日本における高齡者の財産管理における信託の活用可能性について. in: 高齡者の財産管理-その現狀と課題-", トラスト, 60 (2008)
- 新井 誠, "米國における信託の日常的利用狀況", 信託, (197) (1999), 信託協会
- 田中 亘, "後継ぎ遺贈-その有效性と信託による代替可能性について. in: 信託法の新展開 :その第一歩をめざして" (2008), 商事法務
- 冨永忠祐, "福祉型信託の活用-信託法を考える", LIBRA, 8(2) (2008), 東京弁護士会
- Eugene F. Scoles, "Problems and Materials on- Decedents' Estates and Trusts, 7th ed." (2006), Aspen Publishers
- Jeffrey N. Pennell, "Estate and Trust Planning" (2005), ABA Publishing
- John H. Langbein, "The Secret Life of the Trust : The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce", Yale L. J., 107 (1997)
- P. H. Pettit, "Equity and the Law of Trusts, 11th ed." (2009), Oxpord Univ. press
- William M. McGovern, Jr., "Wills, trusts, and estates :including taxation and future interests" (2004), Thomson, West.
- American Law Institute, "Restatement of the law(Second), Trust 2d.", ~ (1959)