본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독본(讀本)의 원리로서의 문학

Reader as a Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This article aims to seek the meaning of ‘literary readers’ through the existing ‘literary readers’ published (planned) by the private sector during the 1930s. Readers either planned or published by the private sector during the 1930s were mostly in the form of ‘literary readers’, and this phenomenon was the same for literary readers published by the Government General. This article considered a phenomenon in which literary works were utilized in the center of ‘literary readers’ as such in connection with the principle of readers. First, 『Sin Munhak Seonjip (New Literature Anthology)』 planned by Samcheolli Co. had been utilizing ‘literary works’ as literary materials in order to enlighten a national awareness from an emotional aspect, and it also had been utilizing 『Literary Readers』 by Lee Yun-jae in order to cultivate the virtue of students on the basis of new spelling principles, while utilizing 『Joseon Literary Readers』 by Lee Gwang-soo in order to boost sentimental lyricalness of popular reader. Whereas these readers didn’t enhance the intrinsic principle of literature to be the principle of a reader despite their form of literary readers, 『the lecture on the prose』 by Lee Tae-jun offered another possibility as a literary reader by proposing ‘literature’ in the extremely enhanced form which the language of an individual should reach. That is, it was confirmed that the individuality preoccupied by ‘literature’ can be a possibility of a ‘reader’, and from this, literary works are not only the literary materials of a reader, but also function even as the principle of a reader.

Abstract

This article aims to seek the meaning of ‘literary readers’ through the existing ‘literary readers’ published (planned) by the private sector during the 1930s. Readers either planned or published by the private sector during the 1930s were mostly in the form of ‘literary readers’, and this phenomenon was the same for literary readers published by the Government General. This article considered a phenomenon in which literary works were utilized in the center of ‘literary readers’ as such in connection with the principle of readers. First, 『Sin Munhak Seonjip (New Literature Anthology)』 planned by Samcheolli Co. had been utilizing ‘literary works’ as literary materials in order to enlighten a national awareness from an emotional aspect, and it also had been utilizing 『Literary Readers』 by Lee Yun-jae in order to cultivate the virtue of students on the basis of new spelling principles, while utilizing 『Joseon Literary Readers』 by Lee Gwang-soo in order to boost sentimental lyricalness of popular reader. Whereas these readers didn’t enhance the intrinsic principle of literature to be the principle of a reader despite their form of literary readers, 『the lecture on the prose』 by Lee Tae-jun offered another possibility as a literary reader by proposing ‘literature’ in the extremely enhanced form which the language of an individual should reach. That is, it was confirmed that the individuality preoccupied by ‘literature’ can be a possibility of a ‘reader’, and from this, literary works are not only the literary materials of a reader, but also function even as the principle of a reader.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 이광수, "朝鮮文學讀本" (1938), 京城: 朝光社
  2. 이윤재, "文藝讀本" (1933), 京城: 漢城圖書株式會社
  3. 문혜윤, "文藝讀本" (2009), 경진문화
  4. 이태준, "문장강화" (1940), 京城: 文章社
  5. 이희승, "歷代朝鮮文學精華" (1938), 京城: 人文社
  6. 조선총독부, "조선어독본 1-5" (2010), 제이앤씨
  7. 문혜윤, "時文讀本" (2009), 경진문화
  8. 강진호, "‘조선어독본’과 일제의 문화정치 —제4차 교육령기 <보통학교 조선어독본>의 경우—", 상허학보, 29, pp.115~148 (2010), 상허학회
  9. 강진호, "근대 교육의 정착과 피식민지 주체", 상허학보, 16, pp.153~184 (2006), 상허학회
  10. 구자황, "근대 독본문화사 연구 서설", 한민족어문학, 53, pp.1~40, 한민족어문학회
  11. 구자황, "근대 독본의 성격과 위상 (2)- 이윤재의 『문예독본』을 중심으로", 상허학보, 20, pp.126~145 (2007), 상허학회
  12. 김성수, "국어(조선어) 독본 수록 서간(書簡)의 존재양상과 사회적 의미", 한국근대문학연구, (22), pp.169~204 (2010), 한국근대문학회
  13. 김지영, "최남선의 시문독본 연구", 한국현대문학연구, 23, pp.83~129, 한국현대문학회
  14. 김혜정, "국어 교재의 문종 및 지은이 변천에 대한 통사적 검토 - 현대 교육과정기 전후 변화를 중심으로 -", 국어교육, (116), pp.35~66 (2005), 한국어교육학회
  15. 문혜윤, "1930년대 어휘의 장과 문학어의 계발", 상허학보, 17, pp.169~194 (2006), 상허학회
  16. 박진숙, "이태준의 언어의식과 근대적 글쓰기의 場", 한국근대문학연구, (23), pp.57~85 (2011), 한국근대문학회
  17. 배개화, "<문장강화>에 나타난 문장(文章) 의식", 한국현대문학연구, (16), pp.417~442 (2004), 한국현대문학회
  18. 배수찬, "일제 강점기 ‘국어교육’의 식민지 근대성 연구 서설", 한국언어문화, 39, pp.5~30, 한국언어문화학회
  19. 송명진, "‘국가’와 ‘수신’, 1890년대 독본의 두 가지 양상 - ≪국민소학독본≫과 ≪신정심상소학≫을 중심으로", 한국언어문화, (39), pp.31~53 (2009), 한국언어문화학회
  20. 윤여탁, "국어교육100년사" (2006), 서울대출판부
  21. 이영훈, "이태준의 『文章講話』와 수사학 - 연구서설 -", 수사학, 3(3), pp.291~310 (2005), 한국수사학회
  22. 임상석, "시문독본 의 편찬 과정과 1910년대 최남선의 출판 활동", 상허학보, 25, pp.47~78, 상허학회
  23. 장정희, "일제 강점기 교과서『조선어독본』에 수록된 단형 서사물의 변화 양상과 그 특징 ― 제1·3·4·7차 교육령기『보통학교 조선어독본』을 중심으로―", 아시아문화연구, 21, pp.251~276 (2011), 아시아문화연구소
  24. 조정봉, "일제하 야학교재 <農民讀本>과 <大衆讀本>의 체제와 내용", 정신문화연구, 30(4), pp.63~87 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원
  25. 천정환, "이태준의 소설론과『문장강화』에 대한 고찰", 한국현대문학연구, pp.179~208 (1998), 한국현대문학회
  26. 紅野謙介, "投機としての문학", pp.152~ (2003), 東京 : 新曜社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)