본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 ‘안’과 ‘속’, 중국어 ‘里’와 ‘中’의 대조연구

A Contrast Study between Korean words of ‘안’, ‘속’ and Chinese ones of ‘里’ and ‘中’

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

While learning a foreign language, most learners go through the process comparing their mother tongue rules and the learning foreign langue’s rules. Korean nouns of ‘안’, ‘속’ and Chinese localizer ‘里’ and ‘中’ are words where the container schema operates in the same way. To find out what rules these words in the both languages use may be a work practically to contribute for Korean learners who make frequently errors in separately using Chinese localizer. A container is a vessel containing a thing or an action in its unique inner space. The inner space is the place being separated from the outer area by a boundary line. The words having such a feature is expanded into the category to be conceived as the ‘container’, by the analogy as well as a practical vessel, that is into an abstractive area. The Korean noun ‘안’ charges the function directing the inside area of boundary line by integrating various containers. And among the four localizers, this word can be only used even in the category of ‘domain’ which is separated into the both areas by a boundary line. If there may be an area being separated into the both sub-areas by a boundary line, the one sub-area can be marked as the word of ‘안’. In spite of integrating with various containers (vessels), the Korean noun ‘속’ is a localizer indicating a material composing its inside and the environment, rather than the space of container, itself. So, the noun of ‘속’ is well integrated with the abstractive container, that is, the vessel containing a story as well as a practical vessel. Because of its meaning feature which concentrates on the surrounded condition, that is the center, the word of ‘속’ is also harmonized with the words meaning a group of things or a state, not a container. A Chinese localizer ‘里’ forming a strong correspondence relation with a practical vessel shows very similar feature with the Korean word ‘안’, but it showed the decisive difference from the latter words in that the Chinese word is not used in the area of ‘domain’. Although it is a component being classified as a container-directional noun, the Chinese word of ‘中’ is identified as that it is rarely used in a sentence showing strong spatiality in real language data. But for the fact, the Chinese word of ‘中’ shows very similar pattern with the Korean word of ‘속’ in that the Chinese word can be integrated with an analogic container and nouns meaning non-container.

Abstract

While learning a foreign language, most learners go through the process comparing their mother tongue rules and the learning foreign langue’s rules. Korean nouns of ‘안’, ‘속’ and Chinese localizer ‘里’ and ‘中’ are words where the container schema operates in the same way. To find out what rules these words in the both languages use may be a work practically to contribute for Korean learners who make frequently errors in separately using Chinese localizer. A container is a vessel containing a thing or an action in its unique inner space. The inner space is the place being separated from the outer area by a boundary line. The words having such a feature is expanded into the category to be conceived as the ‘container’, by the analogy as well as a practical vessel, that is into an abstractive area. The Korean noun ‘안’ charges the function directing the inside area of boundary line by integrating various containers. And among the four localizers, this word can be only used even in the category of ‘domain’ which is separated into the both areas by a boundary line. If there may be an area being separated into the both sub-areas by a boundary line, the one sub-area can be marked as the word of ‘안’. In spite of integrating with various containers (vessels), the Korean noun ‘속’ is a localizer indicating a material composing its inside and the environment, rather than the space of container, itself. So, the noun of ‘속’ is well integrated with the abstractive container, that is, the vessel containing a story as well as a practical vessel. Because of its meaning feature which concentrates on the surrounded condition, that is the center, the word of ‘속’ is also harmonized with the words meaning a group of things or a state, not a container. A Chinese localizer ‘里’ forming a strong correspondence relation with a practical vessel shows very similar feature with the Korean word ‘안’, but it showed the decisive difference from the latter words in that the Chinese word is not used in the area of ‘domain’. Although it is a component being classified as a container-directional noun, the Chinese word of ‘中’ is identified as that it is rarely used in a sentence showing strong spatiality in real language data. But for the fact, the Chinese word of ‘中’ shows very similar pattern with the Korean word of ‘속’ in that the Chinese word can be integrated with an analogic container and nouns meaning non-container.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 임혜원, "언어와 인지-몸과 언어 의미에 대한 인지언어학적 고찰" (2013), 한국문화사
  2. 정윤철, "한국어와 중국어의 시간, 공간표현 대조분석 - 한→중 작문오류를 중심으로 -", 중국연구, 36, pp.3~22 (2005), 중국연구소
  3. 정현애, "말뭉치 자료 분석을 통한 방위사 ‘中’의 탐색― ‘裏’와의 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (103), pp.135~151 (2017), 중국어문학연구회
  4. 姜海燕, "汉语“裏”类方位词研究综述", 哈尔滨師範大学社会科学学报, (5) (2015)
  5. 유위, "方位词“里”与“内”的组合差异及其动因", 중국언어연구, (58), pp.79~102 (2015), 한국중국언어학회
  6. 吕兆格, "方位词“裏”,“外”的语义认知基礎與对外汉语教学", 雲南师范大学学报, (5) (2005)
  7. 温敏, "方位词“裏”,“中”的语义认知分析及对外汉语教学", 信阳師範学院学报, (2) (2010)
  8. 邢福义, "方位結構“X裏”和“X中”", 世界汉语教学, (4) (1996)
  9. 杨辉, "容器方位词裏、内、中、外的空间意义", 四川教育学院学报, (12) (2008)
  10. 杨辉, "论动词性成分與容器方位词的组合", 黄山学院学报, (1) (2010)
  11. 杨江, "方位词“裏” “中” “内”的语义认知分析", 湖南科技大学学报, (6) (2007)
  12. 박서경, "日韓対照研究:「中naka", 内uchi」と「안an, 日本語敎育, pp.2009, (47)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)