조선시대 윤음 언해본에 나타난 어찌마디 연구
A Syntactic Study of Adverbial Clauses of Yuneum Eonhaebon in Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules within adverbial clauses of Yuneum eonhaebon in Joseon dynasty. This paper can be summarized as follows. The basic structure of the adverbial clause is classified into transitive verb, intransitive verb and adjective. The predicate in the adverbial clause can be classified into adjective and verb. The adjective can be classified into ‘judgment adjective’, ‘feeling adjective’ and ‘form dimension adjective’. The verbs are relatively selected to a small number than adjective as the predicate in the adverbial clause. When the verb is the predicate in the adverbial clause, most of the structures are causatively ‘-ke hʌ-’ pattern. This is because Yuneum eonhaebon is documents for command. Adverbial endings in the object of study are ‘-tʌs, -torok, -ke’ and ‘-i’. When the predicate in the adverbial clause is judgment adjective, the ‘-i’ adverbial clauses appeared overwhelmingly in Yuneum eonhaebon. It seems to be due to the conservatism of royal courtly language.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find the syntactic rules within adverbial clauses of Yuneum eonhaebon in Joseon dynasty. This paper can be summarized as follows. The basic structure of the adverbial clause is classified into transitive verb, intransitive verb and adjective. The predicate in the adverbial clause can be classified into adjective and verb. The adjective can be classified into ‘judgment adjective’, ‘feeling adjective’ and ‘form dimension adjective’. The verbs are relatively selected to a small number than adjective as the predicate in the adverbial clause. When the verb is the predicate in the adverbial clause, most of the structures are causatively ‘-ke hʌ-’ pattern. This is because Yuneum eonhaebon is documents for command. Adverbial endings in the object of study are ‘-tʌs, -torok, -ke’ and ‘-i’. When the predicate in the adverbial clause is judgment adjective, the ‘-i’ adverbial clauses appeared overwhelmingly in Yuneum eonhaebon. It seems to be due to the conservatism of royal courtly language.
참고문헌 (18)
- 권경희, "국어 복합문 체계에 대한 검토－부사절을 중심으로", 동남어문논집, 7, pp.1~20 (1997), 동남어문학회
- 김인택, "한국어 종속마디와 어찌마디", 국어국문학지, 30, pp.273~298 (1993), 문창어문학회
- 남기심, "접속어미와 부사형어미", 말, 10, pp.69~77 (1985), 연세대 한국어학당
- 남지순, "한국어 형용사 전자사전을 위한 형태ㆍ통사ㆍ의미 분류", 언어와언어학, (47), pp.73~112 (2010), 언어연구소
- 윤혜영, "‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구 - 15ㆍ16세기 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (23), pp.235~266 (2008), 한말연구학회
- 윤혜영, "‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구 －17․18세기 중심으로－", 한말연구, (27), pp.157~194 (2010), 한말연구학회
- 윤혜영, "17세기 발화풀이씨가 이끄는 어찌마디 연구 - ‘-이", -게’ 어찌마디를 중심으로 -, 2011, pp.1(31), 27~59[DOI]
- 윤혜영, "‘너기다’류에 나타난 어찌마디 연구", 언어학 연구, (20), pp.129~154 (2011), 한국중원언어학회
- 유현경, "부사절을 필수적으로 요구하는 구문에 대한 연구", 한국어학, 29, pp.159~186 (2005), 한국어학회
- 유현경, "형용사에 결합된 어미 ‘-게’ 연구", 한글, (273), pp.99~123 (2006), 한글학회
- 이관규, "국어 부사절 범위에 대한 여러 견해와 그 한계점", 언어, 27(3), pp.399~416 (2002), 한국언어학회
- 이정복, "한국어 경어법의 기능과 사용 원리" (2012), 소통
- 허웅, "16세기 우리 옛말본" (1989), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
- 허원욱, "16세기 어찌마디의 통어론적 연구", 한말연구, 12, pp.181~203 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 허원욱, "16세기 통어론" (2004), 신성출판사
- 허원욱, "17세기 어찌마디의 통어적 연구", 한글, (270), pp.87~110 (2005), 한글학회
- 허원욱, "18세기 어찌마디의 통어론적 연구", 한말연구, (31), pp.341~360 (2012), 한말연구학회