역대 문법 교과서의 ‘보어절과 보어’ 연구
A study on the complement clause and complement in the past school grammar textbooks
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the complement clause appeared for the time being in the past school grammar textbooks and also examine the complement and complement phrase in the past school grammar textbooks. The complements were presented as the main constituent of the basic sentence patterns or the essential component of incomplete predicate combining with complement case marker in the past school grammar textbooks. The establishment of complement, complement phrase, complement clause were based on the argument of incomplete predicate, ‘되다, 아니다, 같다’. While the embedded clauses are based on the formal markers in the present grammar, the complement clauses were based on the sentence constituents in the past school grammar textbooks. The complement clause had the subject-predicate relation and co-occurred with incomplete predicate. Therefore the complement clause of the past school grammar textbooks, combining with nominal, quotative markers have segmented into noun clause, quotative clause in the present grammar which is based on the formal marker.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the complement clause appeared for the time being in the past school grammar textbooks and also examine the complement and complement phrase in the past school grammar textbooks. The complements were presented as the main constituent of the basic sentence patterns or the essential component of incomplete predicate combining with complement case marker in the past school grammar textbooks. The establishment of complement, complement phrase, complement clause were based on the argument of incomplete predicate, ‘되다, 아니다, 같다’. While the embedded clauses are based on the formal markers in the present grammar, the complement clauses were based on the sentence constituents in the past school grammar textbooks. The complement clause had the subject-predicate relation and co-occurred with incomplete predicate. Therefore the complement clause of the past school grammar textbooks, combining with nominal, quotative markers have segmented into noun clause, quotative clause in the present grammar which is based on the formal marker.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강윤호, "정수 문법" (1968)
- 양주동, "새 문법" (1968)
- 이명권, "문법" (1968)
- 이숭녕, "국어문법" (1968)
- 이을환, "최신 문법" (1968)
- 정인승, "표준 문법" (1968)
- 이길록, "문법" (1979)
- 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원, "고등학교 문법" (1985)
- 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 교육인적자원부
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론 I" (2015), 집문당
- 권재일, "한국어 문법론" (2012), 태학사
- 김건희, "단어, 품사, 문장성분의 분류에 대한 일고찰- 상호 연관성과 변별성을 중심으로 -", 인문논총, 71(1), pp.279~316 (2014), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- 김건희, "한국어 연구의 새로운 흐름", pp.45~72 (2018), 박이정
- 김건희, "역대 문법 교과서의 ‘구와 절’ 기술 ―문장 분류와 관련된 논점을 중심으로―", 한글, 79(3), pp.595~627 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]
- 김건희, "명사구, 명사절, 관형사절", 한말연구, (49), pp.55~90 (2018), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 김기혁, "문장 구성에서 단위의 문제", 연세어문학, 18, pp.5~32 (1985), 연세대학교 국어국문학과
- 남기심, "새로 쓴 표준 국어문법론" (2019), 한국문화사
- 송복승, "국어 보어의 특성과 범위 재론", 한국언어문학, (61), pp.5~29 (2007), 한국언어문학회
- 송창선, "현행 학교문법에서 보어 설정의 문제점", 국어교육연구, (43), pp.83~104 (2008), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 양명희, "보어와 학교문법", 한국어학, 32, pp.167~192 (2006), 한국어학회
- 유현경, "한국어 명사절의 범위에 대한 연구", 한글, 79(1), pp.37~66 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]
- 유현경, "한국어 표준 문법" (2018), 집문당
- 조형일, "학교문법에서의 보어 범주 재고", 국어교육연구, (21), pp.225~245 (2008), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 허웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
- Dixon, R. M. W., "딕슨 영문법" (1995), 한국문화사
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Complement clauses and complementation strategies in Typological perspective", pp.1~48 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Dryer, M. S., "Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause structure, Volume 1", pp.224~275 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Noonan, M., "Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions, Volume 2", pp.42~140 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Rosenbaum, P., "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions" (1967), MIT Press