서술절에 대한 재고찰 - 내포절 체계 내의 다른 절과의 변별을 중심으로 -
The re-examination of the predicate clause -focused on the distinction of the predicate clause with other embedded clause-
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to re-examine the predicate clause focused on the distinction of the predicate clause with other embedded clause. There have been the assertions where predicate clause must be disused from the theoretical grammar, however, the predicate clause is still used from the school grammar. Once the predicate clause is established in the framework of embedded clause, there must be the expansive examinations which deal with the secondary embedding of predicate clause as well as the similarities and differences with other embedded clause. The main contents of this study are such as followings. First, ‘clausal marker’ is examined from the function of embedded clause and the correspondence of ‘embedded clause/embedding sentence’ expansively. the inconsistency and unsubstantiality of ‘the movement of the elements of the embedding sentence into the embedded clause’ as the reason for the establishment of predicate clause are showed. Second, the problems of the recent assertion which considered ‘the predicate clause embedding sentence’ as ‘topic subject predicate’ are examined, in particular, if the ‘topic subject predicate’ would be introduced to the framework of embedded clause, the unit of other embedded clause will be disintegrating. Third, the validness of the predicate clause is examined from the perspective of function. the expansive explanation mechanism for the semantic connection of the first noun phrase with the rest sentence is ‘predicate clause’. Fourth, the distinction of predicate clause with other embedded clause is examined. the nominal clause and adnominal clause can be secondarily embedded into the predicate clause and the similarities with the quotative clause are examined.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to re-examine the predicate clause focused on the distinction of the predicate clause with other embedded clause. There have been the assertions where predicate clause must be disused from the theoretical grammar, however, the predicate clause is still used from the school grammar. Once the predicate clause is established in the framework of embedded clause, there must be the expansive examinations which deal with the secondary embedding of predicate clause as well as the similarities and differences with other embedded clause. The main contents of this study are such as followings. First, ‘clausal marker’ is examined from the function of embedded clause and the correspondence of ‘embedded clause/embedding sentence’ expansively. the inconsistency and unsubstantiality of ‘the movement of the elements of the embedding sentence into the embedded clause’ as the reason for the establishment of predicate clause are showed. Second, the problems of the recent assertion which considered ‘the predicate clause embedding sentence’ as ‘topic subject predicate’ are examined, in particular, if the ‘topic subject predicate’ would be introduced to the framework of embedded clause, the unit of other embedded clause will be disintegrating. Third, the validness of the predicate clause is examined from the perspective of function. the expansive explanation mechanism for the semantic connection of the first noun phrase with the rest sentence is ‘predicate clause’. Fourth, the distinction of predicate clause with other embedded clause is examined. the nominal clause and adnominal clause can be secondarily embedded into the predicate clause and the similarities with the quotative clause are examined.
참고문헌 (32)
- 2012, , ~
- 김건희, "형용사의 주격 중출 구문과 여격 주어 구문에 대하여", 한말연구, 13, pp.1~37 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 김건희, "인용절에 대한 재고찰 - 내포절 체계 내의 다른 절과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 한글, (307), pp.125~169 (2015), 한글학회
- 김영국, "주제(Topic)와 주어(Subject): 영어와 한국어의 비교 연구", 언어연구, 26(2), pp.1~14 (2009), 언어정보연구소
- 남기심, "국어학 신연구" (1986), 탑출판사
- 남기심, "국어 문법의 탐구 I", pp.52~67 (1996), 태학사
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2014), 탑출판사
- 성기철, "문서술어 복합문", 국어학, 16, pp.361~377 (1987), 국어학회
- 송창선, "이른바 ‘이중 주어 구문’에 대한 비판적 고찰", 국어교육연구, (45), pp.449~474 (2009), 국어교육학회(since1969)
- 안명철, "이중주어 구문과 구-동사", 국어학, 38, pp.181~207 (2001), 국어학회
- 안명철, "主格 重出 構文과 歸屬役", 어문연구(語文硏究), 39(4), pp.81~111 (2011), 한국어문교육연구회
- 양정석, "‘이중주어문’과 ‘이중목적어문’에", 연세어문학, 20, pp.255~318 (1987), 연세대학교 국어국문학과
- 유현경, "표준국어문법 개발" (2014), 국립국어원
- 이관규, "국어의 문장 구성에 대한 연구와 전망", 한국어학, 16, pp.105~147 (2002), 한국어학회
- 이관규, "학교문법론" (2012), 월인
- 이선웅, "통사 단위 ‘절’에 대하여", 배달말, (56), pp.77~104 (2015), 배달말학회
- 이숭녕, "『문법 II』, 국어학 강좌 2", pp.13~35 (1999), 태학사
- 임동훈, "이중 주어문의 통사 구조", 한국문화, 19, pp.31~66 (1997), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
- 이정택, "이른바 중주어문에 관하여", 청람어문교육, (34), pp.243~258 (2006), 청람어문교육학회
- 임홍빈, "국어 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
- 임홍빈, "한국어의 주제와 통사분석: 주제 개념의 새로운 전개" (2007), 서울대학교출판부
- 전후민, "학교문법의 개념 정립을 위한 ‘독서와 문법’ 교과서와 지도서 분석2 - ‘문장’을 중심으로 -", 문법 교육, 22, pp.139~168 (2014), 한국문법교육학회
- 채희락, "'tough-구문'과 비교구문의 영어-한국어 비교 분석", 어학연구, 34(1), pp.33~71 (1998), 서울대 어학연구소
- 한정한, "명사 논항의 자릿수와 이중주어 구문의 주어", 한국어학, 61, pp.369~402 (2013), 한국어학회
- 허웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
- 홍기선, "한국어의 격중출구문과 담화구조", 언어, 39(3), pp.677~699 (2014), 한국언어학회
- Geach, P, "Reference and Generality" (1962), Cornell University Press
- Lee Sun Hee, "Korean Tough Constructions and Double Nominative Constructions", The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG (2003), Standford University
- Reinhart, T, "Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics", Philosophica, 27, pp.53~94 (1981)
- Rothstein, S, "Predicates and their subjects" (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- 류병래, "Multiple Case Marking Constructions in Korean Revisited", 언어와 정보, 17(2), pp.1~27 (2013), 한국언어정보학회