형태소 분석의 중요성에 대하여 －선어말어미 ‘－오－’를 중심으로－
About the Importance of the Analysisof One Morpheme
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is about the importance of the analysis of one morpheme - pre-final ending ‘－O－’ in Middle Korean. This research suggests that the extent of morphological distribution of ‘－O－’ is in front of the verbal ending ‘－n, －l, -m’ and the syntactic function of ‘－O－’ is the pre-final ending to construct the NP-embedded sentence in middle Korean. The nominalization by ‘－m’ and the adnominalization by ‘－n, －l’ can be described together with its same syntactic function to construct NP-embedded sentences, and the obligatory appearance of ‘－O－’ in NP-embedded sentences by nominal construction gives justification to describe ‘－on, －ol, －om’ as a same criterion. And also the disappearance of ‘－O－’ can be explained by the change of the syntactic function. ‘－O－’ is getting disappeared from the NP-embedded sentence construction whose nominality is weakened. It tells that ‘－O－’ is deeply concerned about the nominality in its syntactic function. The study about the prefinal ending ‘－O－’ in Korean still has many questions in its syntactic function and its disappearance in language change. For this, this article emphasizes the importance of the analysis of one morpheme and suggests very strict criterion.
Abstract
This article is about the importance of the analysis of one morpheme - pre-final ending ‘－O－’ in Middle Korean. This research suggests that the extent of morphological distribution of ‘－O－’ is in front of the verbal ending ‘－n, －l, -m’ and the syntactic function of ‘－O－’ is the pre-final ending to construct the NP-embedded sentence in middle Korean. The nominalization by ‘－m’ and the adnominalization by ‘－n, －l’ can be described together with its same syntactic function to construct NP-embedded sentences, and the obligatory appearance of ‘－O－’ in NP-embedded sentences by nominal construction gives justification to describe ‘－on, －ol, －om’ as a same criterion. And also the disappearance of ‘－O－’ can be explained by the change of the syntactic function. ‘－O－’ is getting disappeared from the NP-embedded sentence construction whose nominality is weakened. It tells that ‘－O－’ is deeply concerned about the nominality in its syntactic function. The study about the prefinal ending ‘－O－’ in Korean still has many questions in its syntactic function and its disappearance in language change. For this, this article emphasizes the importance of the analysis of one morpheme and suggests very strict criterion.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강길운, "한정법(삽입모음오", 우)에 대하여, 1972, pp.1, 3~28
- 고영근, "중세국어의 시상과 서법" (1981), 탑출판사
- 백두현, "고려시대 석독구결의 선어말어미 ‘－了(오)－’의 분포와 문법기능", 어문논총, 30, pp.93~136 (1996), 경북어문학회
- 서태룡, "내포와 접속", 국어학, 8, pp.109~135 (1979)
- 손주일, "15세기국어의 선어말어미 ‘－오", 우－’에 대한 통사론적 연구, 서강대학교, 1980
- 손주일, "15세기국어 ‘－ㄴ, －ㄹ’관형사형과 ‘+- －오", 우－와의 관련성, 1996, pp.3, 47~98
- 안병희, "‘갸’ 논고", 국어국문학, 26, pp.201~209 (1963)
- 이남덕, "15세기 국어의 서법연구", 박사, pp.1970
- 이숭녕, "어간형성과 활용어미에서의 ‘－오", 우－’의 개재에 대하여, 1959, pp.8, 3~70[DOI]
- 이인모, "중세국어의 서법과 시제의 연구", 박사, pp.1975
- 임홍빈, "선어말 ‘－오", 우－’와 확실성, 1981, pp.3, 91~134[DOI]
- 전정례, "중세국어 명사구내포문에서의 ‘－오－’의 기능", 언어연구, 1, pp.55~74 (1990), 서울대학교 언어학과
- 전정례, "중세국어 명사구내포문에서의 ‘－오－’의 기능과 변천", 박사, pp.1991
- 전정례, "주체․대상법으로서의 ‘－오－’에 대한 재고찰", 국어학, 22, pp.325~340 (1992)
- 전정례, "‘－오 구문연구", 국어교육, 85(86), pp.125~139 (1994), 한국국어교육연구회
- 정재형, "15세기 국어의 선어말어미 ‘－오", 우－’에 대한 연구, 한국외국어대학교, 1985
- 차현실, "중세국어 응축보문 연구:‘－오", 우－의 동사기능을 중심으로, 이화여자대학교, 1981
- 허 웅, "삽입모음고", 논문집, pp.83~152 (1959), 서울대학교
- 허 웅, "또 다시 인칭․대상 활용어미로서의 오", 우를 논함, 1963, pp.10, 1~23
- 허 웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 홍종선, "근대국어문법, 국어의 시대별 변천 연구", pp.143~190 (1997), 국립국어연구원
- 河野六郞, "河野六郞著作集" (1979), 平凡社
- "용비어천가 (용가)", ~
- "석보상절(석상)", ~
- "월인석보(월석)", ~
- "능엄경언해(능엄)", ~
- "법화경언해(법)", ~
- "금강경언해(금강)", ~
- "아미타경언해(아미타)", ~
- "금강경삼가해(금삼)", ~
- "관음경언해(관음)", ~
- "번역노걸대(노걸)", ~
- "번역소학(번소)", ~
- "소학언해(소언)", ~
- "몽어노걸대(몽노)", ~