‘관형형 어미+의존명사 구문’의 어미화 연구
A Study on Transformation into Endings of ‘Endings of Modifier Form+a Bound Noun Structure'
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A structure, which is not an ending, functions as an ending, or sometimes is used like an ending through grammaticalization. This writing is aimed at looking into the principle of becoming an ending of these structures by looking into the aspect of becoming an ending of ‘an ending of modifier form+ a bound noun structure from’ this prospective. Particularly, this writing judged ‘types of endings of modifier form' as important in discerning the ending degree of individual forms which belong to ‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure', and used it as a discerning standard of ‘the degree in becoming an ending.' The composition of discussion is as follows: In Chapter 2, this writing divided 'endings of modifier form+bound noun structure' into the structure transforming into a connective ending and the structure transforming into a final ending in order to look into the aspect of what process causes 'an ending of modifier form+a bound noun structure' to transform into an ending, and surveyed endings of modifier form which precede respective individual sentence structures. In Chapter 3, this writing looked into the principle of transformation into endings of 'endings of modifier form+a bound noun structure.' As a result, this writing confirmed that the more the process of its transformation into final endings progresses, the meaning of the object situation becomes more abstract and the object situation turns into a non-restrictive situation, and consequently that even the ending types of modifier form coming as antecedent elements are replaced by the non-restrictive modifier form. Also, ‘endings of modifier form+a bound noun structure' can be divided into the sentence structure, in which 'Transformation into endings' is comparatively much established, and the sentence structure, in which ‘Transformation into endings' is less established; at this point, this writing used the ending of modifier form ‘-던(deon: an ending meaning ‘Unfinished state' as a standard of discerning the ‘degree of transformation into an ending.' As a result, this writing could learn that there wasn't much progress in transformation into endings in case of ‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure', in which the ending of modifier form ‘-던’ exclusively used for a restrictive situation can be used because this structure(‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure') has more of a semantic function of indicating a concrete restrictive situation than other structures, in which '-던’ cannot be used. Also, this writing got to the conclusion that there are ‘-(으)ㄴ, -는, (으)ㄹ’ in endings of modifier form which belong to the non-restrictive modifier form, even among which the more of the sentence structure, in which ‘-을’ is used, ‘transformation into endings' comes up more often.
Abstract
A structure, which is not an ending, functions as an ending, or sometimes is used like an ending through grammaticalization. This writing is aimed at looking into the principle of becoming an ending of these structures by looking into the aspect of becoming an ending of ‘an ending of modifier form+ a bound noun structure from’ this prospective. Particularly, this writing judged ‘types of endings of modifier form' as important in discerning the ending degree of individual forms which belong to ‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure', and used it as a discerning standard of ‘the degree in becoming an ending.' The composition of discussion is as follows: In Chapter 2, this writing divided 'endings of modifier form+bound noun structure' into the structure transforming into a connective ending and the structure transforming into a final ending in order to look into the aspect of what process causes 'an ending of modifier form+a bound noun structure' to transform into an ending, and surveyed endings of modifier form which precede respective individual sentence structures. In Chapter 3, this writing looked into the principle of transformation into endings of 'endings of modifier form+a bound noun structure.' As a result, this writing confirmed that the more the process of its transformation into final endings progresses, the meaning of the object situation becomes more abstract and the object situation turns into a non-restrictive situation, and consequently that even the ending types of modifier form coming as antecedent elements are replaced by the non-restrictive modifier form. Also, ‘endings of modifier form+a bound noun structure' can be divided into the sentence structure, in which 'Transformation into endings' is comparatively much established, and the sentence structure, in which ‘Transformation into endings' is less established; at this point, this writing used the ending of modifier form ‘-던(deon: an ending meaning ‘Unfinished state' as a standard of discerning the ‘degree of transformation into an ending.' As a result, this writing could learn that there wasn't much progress in transformation into endings in case of ‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure', in which the ending of modifier form ‘-던’ exclusively used for a restrictive situation can be used because this structure(‘an ending of modifier form +a bound noun structure') has more of a semantic function of indicating a concrete restrictive situation than other structures, in which '-던’ cannot be used. Also, this writing got to the conclusion that there are ‘-(으)ㄴ, -는, (으)ㄹ’ in endings of modifier form which belong to the non-restrictive modifier form, even among which the more of the sentence structure, in which ‘-을’ is used, ‘transformation into endings' comes up more often.
참고문헌 (23)
- 고석주, "의존적 쓰임의 명사에 대한 연구", 사전편찬연구, 9(1) (1999)
- 김현정, "국어 명사의 문법화과정 연구 : 어미화과정을 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
- 김태엽, "의존명사 ‘것’의 문법화와 문법 변화", 우리말글, 8 (1990), 우리말글학회
- 김태엽, "국어 종결 어미화의 문법화 양상", 어문연구, 33 (2000), 어문연구학회
- 남길임, "'이다' 구문의 한 유형―양태 구문으로서의 '이다' 구문 연구―", 한글, (259), pp.171~197 (2003), 한글학회
- 박영순, "외국어로서의 한국어교육론" (1998), 월인
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 백봉자, "외국어로서의 한국어 문법 사전" (1999), 연세대학교 출판부
- 안정아, "의존명사 구성의 양태 의미 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2000
- 안신혜, "국어 의존명사의 문법화 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 안주호, "한국어 명사의 문법화 현상 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 안주호, "현대국어의 의존명사 목록에 대하여", 어문학, (93), pp.57~79 (2006), 한국어문학회
- 안효경, "현대국어 의존명사 연구" (2001), 역락
- 이동우, "양태성 메인 이름씨 구성 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 이성하, "문법화 연구의 현황과 전망", 우리말연구, 21(21), pp.35~50 (2007), 우리말학회
- 임동훈, "현대국어 형식명사 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
- 임동훈, "‘-을’의 문법 범주", 한국어학, 44, pp.55~81 (2009), 한국어학회
- 송대헌, "한국어 명사의 문법화 양상 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2014
- 시정곤, "의존명사 구문의 양태적 고찰", 한국어학, 44, pp.177~212 (2009), 한국어학회
- 황병순, "부정 접속 복문과 한정 접속 복문", 배달말, 28 (2001), 배달말학회
- 황병순, "한정 관형절과 비한정(부정) 관형절", 배달말, (33), pp.197~211 (2003), 배달말학회
- 황병순, "한국어 문장 문법" (2004), 한국문화사
