본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 신문 보도문의 ‘개입(Engagement)’ 표현에 대한 연구

A study on engagement in Korean newspaper reports

1

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

We explored 'Engagement' in Korean, based on Appraisal Theory with newspaper reports in <Donga-ilbo>, <Joongang-ilbo> and <Hankyoreh- Shinmun>. 'Engagement' provides the means for the authorial voice to position itself with respect to, and hence to ‘engage’ with, the other voices and alternative positions construed as being in play in the current communicative context. 'Engagement' in Korean is divided into four, as follows. First, we cover 'Disclaim' by which some prior utterance or some alternative position is invoked so as to be directly rejected, replaced or held to be unsustainable. This is the domain of negation and concession/counter- expectation. This is most typically achieved through words as anida, anta, motada, eopda, etc. and geuleona, hajiman, etc. Second, 'Endorse' is a sort of 'Proclaim'. We refer to 'Endorse' by which propositions sourced to external sources are construed by the authorial voice as correct, valid, undeniable or otherwise maximally warrantable. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as X-e ttareumyeon, X-reul bomyeon, X-e/eseo (bodeunsi), josa/hwagin gyeolgwa, etc. and words as natanada, deureonada, josadoeda, bakhyeojida, hwagindoeda, etc. Third, 'Entertain' is a expression by the authorial voice. It indicates that its position is but one of a number of possible positions. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as -neun jeonmangi jibaejeogida, -eul ganeungseongi nopda, -eul manhada, -eul sudo issda, -eul geoseulo boida, -eul geoseulo gwancheugdoeda, -eul geoseulo yesangdoeda, etc. Fourth, We deal with 'Attribute' which disassociates the proposition from the text’s internal authorial voice by attributing it so some external source. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as -go gangjohada, -go malhada, -go balghida, etc. and -neun gwancheugi naoda/issda/…, -neun mali naoda/issda/…, -neun somuni naoda/issda/…, etc.

Abstract

We explored 'Engagement' in Korean, based on Appraisal Theory with newspaper reports in <Donga-ilbo>, <Joongang-ilbo> and <Hankyoreh- Shinmun>. 'Engagement' provides the means for the authorial voice to position itself with respect to, and hence to ‘engage’ with, the other voices and alternative positions construed as being in play in the current communicative context. 'Engagement' in Korean is divided into four, as follows. First, we cover 'Disclaim' by which some prior utterance or some alternative position is invoked so as to be directly rejected, replaced or held to be unsustainable. This is the domain of negation and concession/counter- expectation. This is most typically achieved through words as anida, anta, motada, eopda, etc. and geuleona, hajiman, etc. Second, 'Endorse' is a sort of 'Proclaim'. We refer to 'Endorse' by which propositions sourced to external sources are construed by the authorial voice as correct, valid, undeniable or otherwise maximally warrantable. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as X-e ttareumyeon, X-reul bomyeon, X-e/eseo (bodeunsi), josa/hwagin gyeolgwa, etc. and words as natanada, deureonada, josadoeda, bakhyeojida, hwagindoeda, etc. Third, 'Entertain' is a expression by the authorial voice. It indicates that its position is but one of a number of possible positions. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as -neun jeonmangi jibaejeogida, -eul ganeungseongi nopda, -eul manhada, -eul sudo issda, -eul geoseulo boida, -eul geoseulo gwancheugdoeda, -eul geoseulo yesangdoeda, etc. Fourth, We deal with 'Attribute' which disassociates the proposition from the text’s internal authorial voice by attributing it so some external source. This is most typically achieved through periphrastic constructions as -go gangjohada, -go malhada, -go balghida, etc. and -neun gwancheugi naoda/issda/…, -neun mali naoda/issda/…, -neun somuni naoda/issda/…, etc.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김병건, "신문 보도문 직접 인용의 비판적 담화 분석", 인문과학연구, (48), pp.115~139 (2016), 인문과학연구소
  2. 김병건, "신문의 사설・칼럼에 나타난 ‘진보’에 대한 비판적 담화 분석", 사회언어학, 24(1), pp.65~90 (2016), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
  3. 김철규, "A Corpus-based Comparison of British Professional Writers’ L1 and Korean University Students’ L2 Argumentative Texts on Environmental Issues in Terms of Heteroglossic ENGAGEMENT in Appraisal", 응용언어학, 27(2), pp.203~230 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
  4. 박미준, "‘참여(engagement)’ 표지의 영한 번역 연구 - <월스트리트 저널>의 오피니언 번역 사례를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 19(2), pp.183~202 (2015), 통번역연구소
  5. 신진원, "‘세월호 사고’에 관한 한·미 신문 사설 비교 연구:평가어 체계를 기반으로", 담화와 인지, 21(3), pp.123~143 (2014), 담화·인지언어학회
  6. 이영희, "한국과 미국 신문의 인용보도 방식 비교 -한미FTA 보도에 나타난 개입 양상-", 사회언어학, 21(1), pp.185~213 (2013), 한국사회언어학회
  7. 이원표, "신문 사설에서의 직접인용:Bakhtin의 ‘대화성(dialogicality)’ 관점에서의 분석", 담화와 인지, 12(2), pp.117~151 (2005), 담화·인지언어학회
  8. 이주리애, "한일 기사문의 평가어(appraisal) 번역: 개입(engagement)표현의 번역을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 17(2), pp.225~247 (2015), 한국통역번역학회
  9. Bakhtin, M. M., "The Dialogic imagination" (1981), University of Texas Press
  10. Fairclough, Norman, "대중매체 담화 분석" (2004), 한국문화사
  11. Fairclough, Norman, "담화분석방법: 사회조사연구를 위한텍스트 분석" (2012), 경진
  12. Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (2004), Hodder Arnold
  13. Martin, J. R., "The Language of Evaluation : Appraisal in English" (2005), Palgrave
  14. Vološinov, V. N., "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1986), Havard University Press
  15. White, P. R. R., "Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: ten critical studies", pp.37~69 (2006), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)