역대 문법 교과서의 ‘-음, -기’ 명사화 기술에 대한 연구사적 고찰 - 명사형 어미와 명사절을 중심으로 -
A study on ‘-eum, -ki’ nominalization in the past school grammar textbooks - focused on nominal ending, noun clause -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the nominal ending and noun clause in the past school grammar textbooks and discuss the ‘-eum, -ki’ nominalization on the language typological basis of the lexical and clausal nominalization. While the ‘-eum, -ki’ was defined as affix in some past school grammar textbooks, there had been accounted for the clausal nominalized element such as the nominalization of sentence. A lot of the past school grammar textbooks showed the clausal nominalization view such as, ‘gerund’(the nominalized verb(or adjective)), ‘noun/nominal clause’(clausal nominalized unit) and ‘the nominalization of sentence’. Only in the past school grammar textbooks which showed the clausal nominalization view, there had been the replacement of ‘noun/nominal clause’ into ‘adnominal clause+kes’, and inclusion of ‘interrogatives’ into the ‘noun/nominal clause’. In particular, inclusion of ‘adnominal clause+kes’ and ‘interrogatives’ into the ‘noun/nominal clause’ clarifies the nominalized objectification irrespective of formal type in the viewpoint of clausal nominalization.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the nominal ending and noun clause in the past school grammar textbooks and discuss the ‘-eum, -ki’ nominalization on the language typological basis of the lexical and clausal nominalization. While the ‘-eum, -ki’ was defined as affix in some past school grammar textbooks, there had been accounted for the clausal nominalized element such as the nominalization of sentence. A lot of the past school grammar textbooks showed the clausal nominalization view such as, ‘gerund’(the nominalized verb(or adjective)), ‘noun/nominal clause’(clausal nominalized unit) and ‘the nominalization of sentence’. Only in the past school grammar textbooks which showed the clausal nominalization view, there had been the replacement of ‘noun/nominal clause’ into ‘adnominal clause+kes’, and inclusion of ‘interrogatives’ into the ‘noun/nominal clause’. In particular, inclusion of ‘adnominal clause+kes’ and ‘interrogatives’ into the ‘noun/nominal clause’ clarifies the nominalized objectification irrespective of formal type in the viewpoint of clausal nominalization.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강복수, "문법(대계 II 1부 54책 143)" (1968)
- 강윤호, "정수 문법(대계 II 1부 54책 144)" (1968)
- 양주동, "새 문법(대계 II 1부 54책 145)" (1968)
- 이명권, "문법(대계 II 1부 55책 146)" (1968)
- 이숭녕, "국어문법(대계 II 1부 56책 147)" (1968)
- 이을환, "최신 문법(대계 II 1부 56책 148)" (1968)
- 이은정, "우리 문법(대계 II 1부 57책 149)" (1968)
- 이인모, "새 문법(대계 II 1부 57책 150)" (1968)
- 이희승, "새 문법(대계 II 1부 58책 151)" (1968)
- 정인승, "표준 문법(대계 II 1부 58책 152)" (1968)
- 최현배, "새로운 말본(대계 II 1부 59책 153)" (1968)
- 허웅, "표준 문법(대계 II 1부 59책 154)" (1968)
- 김민수, "표준 문법(대계 II 1부 59책 155)" (1968)
- 김완진, "문법(대계 II 1부 60책 156, 157)" (1979)
- 김민수, "문법(대계 II 1부 61책 158, 159)" (1979)
- 이길록, "문법 (대계 II 1부 62책 160, 161)" (1979)
- 허웅, "문법(대계 II 1부 63책 162, 163)" (1979)
- 이응백, "문법(대계 II 1부 64책 164, 165)" (1979)
- 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원, "고등학교 문법(대계 II 1부 66책 168, 169)" (1985)
- 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원, "고등학교 문법(대계 II 1부 67책 170, 171)" (1991)
- 서울대학교 사범대학 국어교육연구소, "고등학교 문법(대계 II 1부 68책 172)" (1996)
- 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "고등학교 문법" (2002), 교육인적자원부
- 권재일, "한국어 문법론" (2012), 태학사
- 김건희, "‘형용사+게’의 부사 되기- 표준국어대사전의 ‘‘형용사+게’ 꼴로 쓰여’ 분석을 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (41), pp.5~36 (2016), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 김건희, "한국어 연구의 새로운 흐름", pp.45~72 (2018), 박이정
- 김건희, "역대 문법 교과서의 ‘구와 절’ 기술 ―문장 분류와 관련된 논점을 중심으로―", 한글, 79(3), pp.595~627 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]
- 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 유현경, "한국어 명사절의 범위에 대한 연구", 한글, 79(1), pp.37~66 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]
- 허웅, "국어학" (1983), 샘문화사
- Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth, "Nominalized clauses and reference to propositional content", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 21(1), pp.215~232 (2018)
- Comrie, B., "Action nominals between verbs and nouns", Rivista di Linguistica, 23(1), pp.7~20 (2011)
- Comrie, B, "Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon Volume 3", pp.349~398 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Dik, Simon C., "The Theory of Functional Grammar Part I: The Structure of the Clause" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Complementation", pp.1~48 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Genetti, C., "Complementation", pp.137~158 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Givón, T., "Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction Volume 2" (1990), Benjamins
- Kim, Min-Joo, "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.345~377 (2009)
- Noonan, M., "Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions Volume 2", pp.42~140 (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Shim, Ji Y., "A New Outlook of Complementizers", Languages, 2, pp.3~17 (2017)