구어와 문어에 나타난 ‘이런’ 연구
A study of ‘ireon(like this)’ in spoken and written Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the realization of the determiner, 'ireon(like this),' in spoken and written Korean, and analyzes its semantic function based on the discovery. First, the characteristics of the realization environment and realization form are analyzed, and then the study delves into how the referential aspects in spoken and written Korean are in detail, and how they work to bind a discourse. In order to explain the difference between ‘ireon’ and ‘geureon(such)’ in spoken and written Korean, the Sejong Spoken Corpus, an analysis data, is used as it includes the previous study on ‘geureon.’ It can be confirmed that ‘ireon’ appears more often in spoken Korean than in written Korean, and that public/private discourse situations have a greater influence than the factors of dialogue/monologue. Mostly, its referents appear in the context of one’s utterance, and there are many cases of referents in sentences. Some on the spot references appear in referential usages, but most of them appear as context references. In ‘quasi-referential usage,’ which has a referent but appearing as an unordered expression, there are many cases of ‘ireon’ used with ‘mwo(what)’ and ‘mak(so much)’ and there appear many types of usages as citations and alternative types of ‘gateun(such as).’ It binds the discourse loosely but clearly as a categorical reference, and binds the discourse by being influenced by the interaction of the participants and the real-time discourse situation. In addition, ‘ireon’ is also used to reveal the speaker’s attitude, and at times it appears because of the communication method dependent on auditory input. In spoken Korean, 'geureon' is used more than 'ireon'. While 'ireon' is greatly influenced by public/private situations, 'geureon' is strongly influenced by conversation/monologue situations. It means that while 'ireon' has many usages for the continuation of one's own utterance, 'geureon' has many usages related to the continuation of discourse in the interaction process. The fact that the possibility of omitting 'geureon' is higher than that of 'ireon' and that the form of 'geureon geo(such as that)' is used more than 'ireon geo(such as this)' indicates that the change in meaning and function of 'geureon' is more active in discourse than ‘ireon.’
Abstract
This study examines the realization of the determiner, 'ireon(like this),' in spoken and written Korean, and analyzes its semantic function based on the discovery. First, the characteristics of the realization environment and realization form are analyzed, and then the study delves into how the referential aspects in spoken and written Korean are in detail, and how they work to bind a discourse. In order to explain the difference between ‘ireon’ and ‘geureon(such)’ in spoken and written Korean, the Sejong Spoken Corpus, an analysis data, is used as it includes the previous study on ‘geureon.’ It can be confirmed that ‘ireon’ appears more often in spoken Korean than in written Korean, and that public/private discourse situations have a greater influence than the factors of dialogue/monologue. Mostly, its referents appear in the context of one’s utterance, and there are many cases of referents in sentences. Some on the spot references appear in referential usages, but most of them appear as context references. In ‘quasi-referential usage,’ which has a referent but appearing as an unordered expression, there are many cases of ‘ireon’ used with ‘mwo(what)’ and ‘mak(so much)’ and there appear many types of usages as citations and alternative types of ‘gateun(such as).’ It binds the discourse loosely but clearly as a categorical reference, and binds the discourse by being influenced by the interaction of the participants and the real-time discourse situation. In addition, ‘ireon’ is also used to reveal the speaker’s attitude, and at times it appears because of the communication method dependent on auditory input. In spoken Korean, 'geureon' is used more than 'ireon'. While 'ireon' is greatly influenced by public/private situations, 'geureon' is strongly influenced by conversation/monologue situations. It means that while 'ireon' has many usages for the continuation of one's own utterance, 'geureon' has many usages related to the continuation of discourse in the interaction process. The fact that the possibility of omitting 'geureon' is higher than that of 'ireon' and that the form of 'geureon geo(such as that)' is used more than 'ireon geo(such as this)' indicates that the change in meaning and function of 'geureon' is more active in discourse than ‘ireon.’
참고문헌 (15)
- 김고운, "'이런, 그런, 저런'의 언어학적 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2010
- 민경모, "한국어 지시사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 서경희, "“이게 바로 그거야”: 원근지시에서 태도지시로", 담화와 인지, 6(2), pp.1~22 (1999), 담화・인지언어학회
- 신지연, "국어 대명사의 품사론", 한국어학, 38, pp.33~56 (2008), 한국어학회
- 이기갑, "{그러하-}의 지시와 대용, 그리고 그 역사", 언어, 19(2), pp.455~488 (1994), 한국언어학회
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
- 장경희, "지시어 ‘이, 그, 저’의 의미 분석", 어학연구, 16(2), pp.167~184 (1980), 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 장경희, "지시사 ‘이, 그, 저’의 범주 지시", 인문논총, 17, pp.5~27 (1989), 한양대학교 인문과학대학
- 전영옥, "신문 기사와 사설에 나타난 ‘이’와 ‘그’ 연구", 언어와언어학, (65), pp.163~196 (2014), 언어연구소
- 전영옥, "한국어 억양단위 연구 - 통사적 특징을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 10(1), pp.241~265 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
- 전영옥, "구어와 문어에서의 ‘그런’의 실현 양상 연구", 한말연구, (50), pp.123~167 (2018), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 최화니, "'이", 그, 그러-, pp.저러-'를 중심으로, 석사[DOI]
- Chafe, W., "Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Sacks, H., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50, pp.696~735 (1974)
- Traugott, E. C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1", pp.189~218 (1991), John Benjamins