본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘정(情)’의 개념화 연구 - 공기(共起) 관계를 중심으로

A study on the conceptualization of "Jeong" in Korean - Focusing on the co-occurrence relation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The former studies of the conceptualization of Korean "Jeong" had not utilized various data set, such as corpus. Furthermore, the number of the following studies does not seem to be sufficient, considering the language's rapid change in these days. Therefore, this study had collected co-occurrence relations related to "Jeong" from dictionaries, previous studies, and corpus data. Moreover, it had analyzed them to figure out and trace the conceptualization, the connoted meaning, and the daily usage of "Jeong", with the aim of broadening the category of its conceptualization. Firstly, this study tried to comprehend the actual usage of "Jeong" by scrutinizing the following Josa(postposition) and predicates. According to the result, it was discovered that "Jeong" had been conceptualized as "Concrete objects", which can be divided into "Dynamic objects" such as "plants and animals ", "moving objects", "enemy", and "fluid substances", and "Static objects" such as "substances that can be verified and quantified", “solid objects that can be held”, "liquids that are confusing in our minds", "nutrients that people need", and "tools used in daily life". Additionally, "Jeong" can also be conceptualized as an "Abstract object" such as a "desired object" or "cause". Lastly, this study revealed that the connoted meaning of "Jeong" gets changed corresponding with its co-occurrence relation, and also the conceptualization too.

Abstract

The former studies of the conceptualization of Korean "Jeong" had not utilized various data set, such as corpus. Furthermore, the number of the following studies does not seem to be sufficient, considering the language's rapid change in these days. Therefore, this study had collected co-occurrence relations related to "Jeong" from dictionaries, previous studies, and corpus data. Moreover, it had analyzed them to figure out and trace the conceptualization, the connoted meaning, and the daily usage of "Jeong", with the aim of broadening the category of its conceptualization. Firstly, this study tried to comprehend the actual usage of "Jeong" by scrutinizing the following Josa(postposition) and predicates. According to the result, it was discovered that "Jeong" had been conceptualized as "Concrete objects", which can be divided into "Dynamic objects" such as "plants and animals ", "moving objects", "enemy", and "fluid substances", and "Static objects" such as "substances that can be verified and quantified", “solid objects that can be held”, "liquids that are confusing in our minds", "nutrients that people need", and "tools used in daily life". Additionally, "Jeong" can also be conceptualized as an "Abstract object" such as a "desired object" or "cause". Lastly, this study revealed that the connoted meaning of "Jeong" gets changed corresponding with its co-occurrence relation, and also the conceptualization too.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 국립국어원, "우리말 큰사전" (1992), 국립국어원
  2. "표준국어대사전" (2008)[URL]
  3. "국립국어원 문어 말뭉치(버전 1.2)" (2020), 국립국어원[URL]
  4. "국립국어원 구어 말뭉치(버전 1.1)" (2021), 국립국어원[URL]
  5. 권연진, "한국어와 영어의 대중가요에 나타난 ‘사랑’ 은유의 양상", 언어과학, 21(4), pp.1~20 (2014), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  6. 권연진, "인지언어학에서 은유의 보편성과 상대성" (2017), 한국문화사
  7. 김하수, "한국어 연어 사전" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
  8. 나익주, "은유의 신체적 근거", 담화와 인지, 1, pp.187~214 (1995), 담화⦁인지학회
  9. 나익주, "인지언어학", pp.415~443 (2000), 한국문화사
  10. 나익주, "‘정’과 ‘한’의 은유적 개념화", 한국어 의미학, 20, pp.91~120 (2006), 한국어의미학회
  11. 배도용, "‘죽음’의 은유적 개념화 양상- 최근의 인터넷 자료를 중심으로 -", 우리말연구, (67), pp.177~204 (2021), 우리말학회
  12. 사회과학출판사 편집부, "조선말 대사전" (2007), 박이정
  13. 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세한국어사전" (2006), 두산동아
  14. 유진희, "한국의 감성적 문화유전자 '정(情)'의 글로벌 수용 가능성에 대한 탐구-한국 드라마를 중심으로-", 콘텐츠문화, 6, pp.11~58 (2015), 콘텐츠문화학회
  15. 유혜선, "한국어 학습자를 위한 ‘情’ 은유에 관한 시론 -초코파이 광고를 중심으로-", 한국언어문화학, 17(2), pp.99~127 (2020), 국제한국언어문화학회
  16. 윤평현, "국어의미론 강의" (2013), 역락
  17. 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
  18. 임지룡, "‘기쁨’과 ‘슬픔’의 개념화 양상", 국어학, 37, pp.219~249 (2001), 국어학회
  19. 임지룡, "기본 감정 표현의 은유화 양상 연구", 한국어학, 17(2), pp.135~162 (2002), 한국어학회
  20. 임지룡, "사랑'의 개념화 양상", 어문학, (87), pp.201~233 (2005), 한국어문학회
  21. 임지룡, "말하는 몸: 감정표현의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2006), 한국문화사
  22. 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
  23. 임혜원, "국어 사물 개념의 은유적 확장 연구", 한국어 의미학, 19, pp.125~155 (2006), 한국어의미학회
  24. 임혜원, "언어와 인지" (2013), 한국문화사
  25. Gibbs, Raymond Jr., "The Poetica of Mind" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  26. Joan L. Bybee, "Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form" (1985), J. Benjamins
  27. Johnson, Mark, "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  28. Kövecses, Zoltan, "Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  29. Kövecses, Zoltan, "Metaphor: A Practical Introduction" (2002), Oxford University Press
  30. Lakoff, George, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  31. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  32. Lakoff, George, "Foundations of Cognitive Linguistis, Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisities" (1987), Standford University Press
  33. Lakoff, George, "Philosophy in the Flesh" (1999), Basic Books
  34. Ogden, C, "The meaning of meaning" (1923), Routledge & Kegan Paul

관련 논문AI추천