반의어 ‘묶다’와 ‘풀다’의 의미와 용법에 한 코퍼스언어학 분석
A corpus-linguistic analysis of the meanings and uses of the antonyms Mwukkta ‘Tie’ and Phwulta ‘Untie’ in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In lexical semantics, antonymy is one of the most widely discussed topics in characterizing “oppositeness” relations of the lexical items in question. This research aims to explore meanings and uses of the two Korean antonyms mwukkta ‘tie’ and phwulta ‘untie’ as a way of characterizing oppositeness relations of the two lexical items, showing that the two lexical items have asymmetrical relations. An examination of the co-occurrence relations of mwukkta and phwulta shows that mukkta frequently co-occurs with concrete nouns, whereas phwulta co-occurs not only with concrete nouns but also with abstract nouns, giving rise to diverse figurative meanings. Phwulta also forms collocational patterns, resulting in many fixed expressions. The analysis of mwukkta and phwulta shows that the two lexical items can be used interchangeably in limited patterns, displaying limited oppositeness relations. The examination also shows that mwukkta and phwulta show asymmetrical relations in their frequency rates, co-occurrence relations, and collational patterns. This fact suggests that the relations between mwukkta and phwulta should be understood in terms of partial antonymy. This study also shows that the figurative meanings of mwukkta and phwulta are derived from metaphors such as [DIFFICULT PROBLEMS ARE ENTANGLED THINGS] and [SUPPRESSED EMOTIONS ARE THINGS], when viewed from Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In sum, this research shows that better and proper understanding of antonymy can be attained through a careful examination of authentic linguistic data
Abstract
In lexical semantics, antonymy is one of the most widely discussed topics in characterizing “oppositeness” relations of the lexical items in question. This research aims to explore meanings and uses of the two Korean antonyms mwukkta ‘tie’ and phwulta ‘untie’ as a way of characterizing oppositeness relations of the two lexical items, showing that the two lexical items have asymmetrical relations. An examination of the co-occurrence relations of mwukkta and phwulta shows that mukkta frequently co-occurs with concrete nouns, whereas phwulta co-occurs not only with concrete nouns but also with abstract nouns, giving rise to diverse figurative meanings. Phwulta also forms collocational patterns, resulting in many fixed expressions. The analysis of mwukkta and phwulta shows that the two lexical items can be used interchangeably in limited patterns, displaying limited oppositeness relations. The examination also shows that mwukkta and phwulta show asymmetrical relations in their frequency rates, co-occurrence relations, and collational patterns. This fact suggests that the relations between mwukkta and phwulta should be understood in terms of partial antonymy. This study also shows that the figurative meanings of mwukkta and phwulta are derived from metaphors such as [DIFFICULT PROBLEMS ARE ENTANGLED THINGS] and [SUPPRESSED EMOTIONS ARE THINGS], when viewed from Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In sum, this research shows that better and proper understanding of antonymy can be attained through a careful examination of authentic linguistic data
참고문헌 (27)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 송지혜, "부정적 감정어와 ‘풀다’의 결합에 관한 국어학과 한의학의 융합적 해석", 어문학, (139), pp.113~137 (2018), 한국어문학회[DOI]
- 연세언어연구원, "연세한국어 사전" (1998), 두산동아
- 이광호, "코퍼스를 활용한 반의어의 총체적 목록 확보 방법에 대한 연구", 國語學, (56), pp.281~308 (2009), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이민우, "말뭉치 統計分析을 이용한 反意語 連續 構成 硏究", 어문연구(語文硏究), 40(1), pp.85~107 (2012), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 이민우, "반의관계를 이용한 한국어 교육 방안", 이중언어학, (49), pp.219~242 (2012), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 이사교, "한국어 반의어의 불균형성에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 46, pp.189~213 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 임채훈, "반의관계와 문장의미 형성 - 형용사, 동사 반의관계 어휘의 공기관계를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.231~256 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- "담화와 인지", 1997, 89~110
- 홍윤기, "문장에서의 반의관계 실현 방식 연구 －반의관계와 문법 구성 및 표현의 상관성을 바탕으로－", 한국어교육, 20(3), pp.185~204 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- Barcelona, Antonio, "Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Biber, Douglas, "Corpus linguistics" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. A., "Lexical semantics" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Dancygier, Barbara, "Figurative language" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Deignan, Alice, "Metaphor and corpus linguistics" (2005), John Benjamins
- Dirven, René, "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Geeraerts, Dirk, "Theories of lexical semantics" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Kennedy, Graeme, "An introduction to corpus linguistics" (1998), Longman
- Kim, Haeyeon, "A corpus-based metaphor-theoretical analysis of the meanings of the antonyms mwukkta ‘tie’ and phwulta ‘untie", solve’ in Korean, 2019, ~[DOI]
- Kövecses, Zoltan, "Metaphor: A practical introduction" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Women, fire, and dangerous things" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphor and thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Murphy, M. Lynne., "Lexical meanings" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Rosch, Eleanor, "Cognitive representation of semantic categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975)
- Saeed, John., "Semantics" (2015), Wiley-Blackwell
- Teubert, Wolfgang, "Corpus linguistics" (2007), Routledge