한국어에 나타나는 ‘경계’ 표현의 개념화 양상
A Study of the Conceptualization Process of Korean ‘Boundary’ Expressions
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this research is to explore the conceptualization process of Korean “boundary” expressions using a cognitive semantics approach. In Chapter 2, I examine the locations and markers of “boundary.” The extracted linguistic examples from the KAIST Corpus and the Sejong Corpus are divided into the two different types: “the boundary of A” and “the boundary between A and B.” It is shown that boundary markers could be tangible objects such as “fence” or “tree” and abstract concepts like “time” or “event” as well. In Chapter 3, I explicate the existing patterns of “boundary” by searching such expressions as “X-verb the boundary” or “The boundary is X-verb.” The results were classified into the 4 different types: a boundary to be set, a boundary that exists, a boundary that changes, and a boundary to be rejected. Specific examples are given and discussed for each type. In the final chapter, metaphorical expressions are investigated in regard to the concept of “boundary” itself. Conceptual metaphors of a “boundary” in the Korean language seem to appear in different patterns, as follows: [a boundary is a concrete object], which can be built, broken, established, shaken, and smashed; [a boundary is a line], which can be pictured and erased; [a boundary is a place], which can be traversed and invaded; [a boundary is a subject of experience], which can be felt and experienced. This paper is one of cognitive semantics studies based on the everyday Korean language. Its significance lies in the fact that the conceptualization process of the “boundary” expressions were examined using the corpus data. I hope this research will contribute to the contemporary humanistic approaches that deal with the boundary phenomenon.
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to explore the conceptualization process of Korean “boundary” expressions using a cognitive semantics approach. In Chapter 2, I examine the locations and markers of “boundary.” The extracted linguistic examples from the KAIST Corpus and the Sejong Corpus are divided into the two different types: “the boundary of A” and “the boundary between A and B.” It is shown that boundary markers could be tangible objects such as “fence” or “tree” and abstract concepts like “time” or “event” as well. In Chapter 3, I explicate the existing patterns of “boundary” by searching such expressions as “X-verb the boundary” or “The boundary is X-verb.” The results were classified into the 4 different types: a boundary to be set, a boundary that exists, a boundary that changes, and a boundary to be rejected. Specific examples are given and discussed for each type. In the final chapter, metaphorical expressions are investigated in regard to the concept of “boundary” itself. Conceptual metaphors of a “boundary” in the Korean language seem to appear in different patterns, as follows: [a boundary is a concrete object], which can be built, broken, established, shaken, and smashed; [a boundary is a line], which can be pictured and erased; [a boundary is a place], which can be traversed and invaded; [a boundary is a subject of experience], which can be felt and experienced. This paper is one of cognitive semantics studies based on the everyday Korean language. Its significance lies in the fact that the conceptualization process of the “boundary” expressions were examined using the corpus data. I hope this research will contribute to the contemporary humanistic approaches that deal with the boundary phenomenon.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김수환, "‘경계’ 개념에 대한 문화기호학적 접근 - 구별의 원리에서 교환의 메커니즘으로", 기호학 연구, 23, pp.489~514 (2008), 한국기호학회
- 나익주, "‘정’과 ‘한’의 은유적 개념화", 한국어 의미학, 20, pp.91~120 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 박수경, "인지언어학에 의한 은유적 의미 고찰", 일어일문학, (34), pp.31~51 (2007), 대한일어일문학회
- 방영심, "한국어에 나타나는 ‘한(恨)’의 개념화 양상", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.95~122 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 이기동, "관용어, 은유, 그리고 환유", 담화와 인지, 4(1), pp.61~87 (1977)
- 임지룡, "국어의미론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "화의 개념화 양상", 언어, 25(4), pp.693~721 (2000)
- 임지룡, "‘기쁨’과 ‘슬픔’의 개념화 양상", 국어학, 37, pp.219~249 (2001)
- 임지룡, "‘긴장’의 개념화 양상", 담화와 인지, 8(2), pp.205~227 (2001)
- 임혜원, "한국어 ‘말’의 은유", 한말연구, 8, pp.139~173 (2001)
- 임혜원, "공간 개념의 은유적 확장 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 전혜영, "연어 구성에 나타난 남녀 은유의 양상", 여성학논집, 22(1), pp.53~77 (2005), 한국여성연구원
- 조지 레이코프, "삶으로서의 은유" (1995), 서광사
- Kövecses, Z., "Metaphor-a practical introduction" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G. Women, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G. Women, "More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor" (1988), University of Chicago Press