한국어 ‘X하다’와 몽골어 ‘X хийх’의 결합 관계와 의미에 관한 대조연구
A Contrastive Study on the Syntagmatic Relation Between Korean Verb, 'Xhada' and Mongolian verb, ‘X хийх’, and their meanings
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The possibility that Korean language and Mongolian language belong to the similar or the same language family, has been discussed by lots of scholars from the systematical perspective, since there are a lot of relations between words of Korean language and Mongolian language, and they both have agglutinative characteristics. So far, there has been a continuous precise contrastive analysis on the overall aspects of grammatical systems of these two languages. The fact that Mongolian language could be similar to Korean language from the language typological viewpoint, shows that sentence structures of modern Korean language and modern Mongolian language have gone through the similar process of development, until today. However, general grammatical systems of two languages have undergone individually distinctive processes of development as a necessity, reflecting different historical development environments. Therefore, it is obvious that there are considerable differences between them, in spite of numerous similarities. Among these discriminative elements, Korean verb, ‘hada’ and Mongolian verb, ‘хийх’ are one of the most basic verbs and also, are representative ones to form sentences consisting of diverse structures. This study examined the lexical meanings and combination type of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’, and compared them with one another. First, this study examined each vocabulary's basic meaning and differences between linguistic elements of two verbs, after suggesting lexical meanings of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’ and then, identified similarities and differences by classifying the combination types of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’ as compounds. Based on this contrast, this study described functional differences among ‘Xhada’ and ‘Xhada’ in ‘X хийх’ structure and ‘X хийх’. Moreover, it was discussed whether ‘Xhada’ and ‘X хийх’ have semantic features such as ‘narrative’, ‘activeness’ and ‘stativity’, and can work as independent forms. In addition, it was identified if the combination types of Korean compounds, ‘noun+hada’, ‘root+hada’, ‘adverb+hada’, ‘loanword+hada’ and so on are available for Mongolian language, and if ‘Xhada’ and ‘hada' in ‘X хийх’ structure and ‘хийх’ could function as independent forms by dividing them, according to the combination types.
Abstract
The possibility that Korean language and Mongolian language belong to the similar or the same language family, has been discussed by lots of scholars from the systematical perspective, since there are a lot of relations between words of Korean language and Mongolian language, and they both have agglutinative characteristics. So far, there has been a continuous precise contrastive analysis on the overall aspects of grammatical systems of these two languages. The fact that Mongolian language could be similar to Korean language from the language typological viewpoint, shows that sentence structures of modern Korean language and modern Mongolian language have gone through the similar process of development, until today. However, general grammatical systems of two languages have undergone individually distinctive processes of development as a necessity, reflecting different historical development environments. Therefore, it is obvious that there are considerable differences between them, in spite of numerous similarities. Among these discriminative elements, Korean verb, ‘hada’ and Mongolian verb, ‘хийх’ are one of the most basic verbs and also, are representative ones to form sentences consisting of diverse structures. This study examined the lexical meanings and combination type of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’, and compared them with one another. First, this study examined each vocabulary's basic meaning and differences between linguistic elements of two verbs, after suggesting lexical meanings of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’ and then, identified similarities and differences by classifying the combination types of ‘hada’ and ‘хийх’ as compounds. Based on this contrast, this study described functional differences among ‘Xhada’ and ‘Xhada’ in ‘X хийх’ structure and ‘X хийх’. Moreover, it was discussed whether ‘Xhada’ and ‘X хийх’ have semantic features such as ‘narrative’, ‘activeness’ and ‘stativity’, and can work as independent forms. In addition, it was identified if the combination types of Korean compounds, ‘noun+hada’, ‘root+hada’, ‘adverb+hada’, ‘loanword+hada’ and so on are available for Mongolian language, and if ‘Xhada’ and ‘hada' in ‘X хийх’ structure and ‘хийх’ could function as independent forms by dividing them, according to the combination types.
참고문헌 (50)
- 고영근, "국어형태론연구" (1989), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고영근, "우리말문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 高在卨, "國語의 合成動詞에 대한 硏究", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1988
- 고재설, "동사 ‘하-’와 형용사 ‘하-’", 國語學, 33, pp.145~175 (1999)
- 권재일, "현대국어의 의존명사 연구, In 천시권박사 화갑기념 국어학논총" (1985)
- 김기혁, "국어 보조동사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1987
- 김영희, "“하다”; 그 대동사 설의 허실", 배달말, 9, pp.31~63 (1984), 배달말학회
- 김영희, "한국어 통사론의 모색" (1988), 탑출판사
- 김은애, "日本語の名詞志向構造と韓国語の動詞指向構造", 朝鮮學報, 188, pp.1~83 (2003)
- 김일병, "국어 합성어 연구" (2000), 역락출판사
- 김창섭, "‘하다’ 동사 형성의 몇 문제", 관악어문연구, 22, pp.247~267 (1997)
- 남기심, "현대국어 통사론" (2001), 태학사
- 남영복, "한자어 명사+する", 하다의 통사적 측면에 대한 대조 연구, 1995, pp.14, 207~222
- 박병수, "The Korean Verb ‘ha’ and Verb Complementation", 어학연구, 10(1), pp.46~82 (1974)
- 박순정, "한국어 하다와 일본어 する의 분류", 日本學硏究, 20(0), pp.325~344 (2007), 일본연구소
- 박종호, "‘X하다’의 결합 유형에 관한 연구", 새국어교육, (84), pp.321~340 (2010), 한국국어교육학회
- 서정수, "동사 ‘하-’의 문법" (1975), 형설출판사
- 송병학, "하에 關한 硏究 : 統辭論的ㆍ意味論的 構造分析", 박사, pp.1974
- 송정근, "구체명사와 결합하는 ‘하다’의 의미 특성에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.123~140 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 시정곤, "통사론의 형태정보와 핵 이동", 국어학, 22, pp.299~324 (1992), 국어학회
- 심재기, "국어어휘론" (1982), 집문당
- 이건수, "상태성 ‘-하다’ 구문의 통사구조와 특성, In 比較文化硏究", pp.201~231 (2005), 경희대학교부설비교문화연구소
- 이건수, "상태성 ‘하다’ 구문에 대한 소고", 언어과학연구, (39), pp.97~124 (2006), 언어과학회
- 이민정, "‘하다’와 결합하는 명사의 복합자질", 국어국문학, 25, pp.141~158 (2006)
- 이성규, "몽골어와 한국어의 수사체계 비교연구", 몽골학, (21), pp.1~17 (2006), 한국몽골학회
- 이익섭, "한국의 언어" (2001), 신구문화사
- 이익섭, "한국어문법" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
- 임서현, "한국어 동사 '하-'와 사건", 개체유형 명사의 결합구조 : 생성어휘부 이론에 입각한 탐구, 서울대학교 대학원, pp.언어학, 2004
- 임서현, "개체유형 명사와 동사 '-하-'의 결합에 관한 생성어휘부 이론적 접근", 언어와 정보, 8(1), pp.77~100 (2004), 한국언어정보학회
- 임지룡, "국어의미론" (2003), 탑출판사
- 임홍빈, "용언의 어근분리 현상에 대하여", 언어, 4(2), pp.56~76 (1979)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1972), 정음사
- 하치근, "국어 파생접미사의 통합 양상에 관한 연구", 한글, 204, pp.5~38 (1989), 한글학회
- E. Lhagvatsetseg, "Mongolan Equivocal Word Usages" (2007)
- Kullmann, R., "Mongolian Grammar" (1996), Jensco, Ltd
- Street, J. C., "KHALKHA STRUCTURE" (1963), Indiana University
- Б.Пүрэв-Очир, "Монгол хэлний “хийх” хэмээх үгийн учир, түүний утгын өргөсөл ба хэрэглээний эргэн тойрон” МУИС-ийн Монгол Судлалын Хүр ээлэнгийн", Acta Mongolica, 11(366), pp.67~84 (2011)
- Базаррагчаа.М., "Үгийн гарлыг мөшгих нь. Боть III,IV,V" (1992)
- Базаррагчаа.М., "Монгол хэлний сүегэр ба найруулбарын тухай" (1995)
- Жанцангийн Бат-Ирээдүй, "Монгол хэлний хэлзүйн дагавар, нөхцөл, баймж үгийн сан" (2009)
- Ц.Өнөрбаян, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний үг зүй" (1998)
- Ш.Барайшир, "Орчин цагийн монгол хэлнийөгүүлбэр зүй" (1989)
- 侯万庄, "｢现代蒙语虚词例释｣-Орчин цагийн Монгол хэлний хийсвэр үгсийн тайлбар Тэргүүн дэвтэр" (1990)
- 侯万庄, "｢现代蒙语虚词例释｣-Орчин цагийн Монгол хэлний хийсвэр үгсийн тайлбар Дэд дэвтэр" (1990)
- "국립국어원 표준국어대사전"[URL]
- 울란바타르대학교 한국학연구소 사전편찬위원회, "몽한사전" (2008)
- Я. Цэвэл, "Монгол хэлний товч тайлбар толь" (1966)
- Ш.Цэцэнцогт, "Монгол үгсийн язгуурын толь" (1987)
- Норжин, "Монгол хэлний толь" (1999)
- "Монгол хэлний хураангуй тайлбар толь" (2008)