퐁트넬의 『신탁의 역사』 - 신탁은 악령의 소행이 아니다
Fontenelle’s History Of Oracles: The Oracles were not made by the demons
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Why did the first Christians believe that oracles had something supernatural? The defects of human spirit accredited oracles: the taste of the marvellous one, ordinary prejudice, spirit of idleness, blind obedience to custom. The former Christians believed that oracles were made by the demons. Seemingly the thesis was not inoffensive. However the Jesuits were right by announcing in this work hidden venom. It was in the criticism employed by Fontenelle. Nowhere he exposes it's principles clearly. The principles had to be deduced among the text by the leader. We recognize the Cartesian method. Thus it is necessary the logical reasoning that God gave us men. But the lights of reason are enough to examine the errors thrown by demons. The revelation assures us the existence of Angels and Demons. Consequently for Fontenlle, under the name of oracle, he does not claim to include the magic of which it is indubitable that only the demonical power is mixed. Thus, he advances boldly that oracles were not made by the demons, and they did not cease with arrival of Jesus Christ.
Abstract
Why did the first Christians believe that oracles had something supernatural? The defects of human spirit accredited oracles: the taste of the marvellous one, ordinary prejudice, spirit of idleness, blind obedience to custom. The former Christians believed that oracles were made by the demons. Seemingly the thesis was not inoffensive. However the Jesuits were right by announcing in this work hidden venom. It was in the criticism employed by Fontenelle. Nowhere he exposes it's principles clearly. The principles had to be deduced among the text by the leader. We recognize the Cartesian method. Thus it is necessary the logical reasoning that God gave us men. But the lights of reason are enough to examine the errors thrown by demons. The revelation assures us the existence of Angels and Demons. Consequently for Fontenlle, under the name of oracle, he does not claim to include the magic of which it is indubitable that only the demonical power is mixed. Thus, he advances boldly that oracles were not made by the demons, and they did not cease with arrival of Jesus Christ.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강건일, "과학,마술,미스테리" (2000), 나무의 꿈
- "구약시대의 신비주의의 이단 . 사탄과 악마 우상과 신비(111)", 강성열[URL]
- 김경호, "예수의 기적 이야기", 기장 회보, (500)
- "바울과 종교", 배현주[URL]
- 변정심, "살라미스 해전에서 ‘나무 성벽’ 신탁의 역할", 역사와경계, (59), pp.251~288 (2006), 부산경남사학회
- 손호은, "독일인의 일상생활 속의 미신적 요소 고찰", 독일어문학, 17(1), pp.417~440 (2009), 한국독일어문학회
- 송기식, "세계의 모든 종족에 계시된 신 개념을 찾아 in:활천" (1993), 활천사
- "무당과 점쟁이들 . 사탄과 악마, 우상, 신비(111)", 유승원[URL]
- 윤광원, "John Calvin의 로마서 주석에 나타난 이성과 계시에 대한 이해", 조직신학연구, (11), pp.54~76 (2008)
- 이재경, "폼포나치의 종교적 믿음에 대하여", 서양고전학연구, (27), pp.255~276 (2006), 한국서양고전학회
- 이태하, "참된 종교와 미신에 대한 흄의 견해", 철학연구, (67), pp.73~91 (2004), 철학연구회
- 임명현, "플루타르크의 영웅들을 만나다(<헬라클레스의 모험>(e-book))", pp.2007, 놀자북
- 장세룡, "피에르 벨의 관용론-양심의 자유에서 양심의 권리로-", 서양사론, (99), pp.5~35 (2008), 한국서양사학회
- 정연락, "무속 , 환생 , 뉴 에이지 문화와 개혁신앙 : 제2회 정기학술심포지엄 발표논문", 사도행전에 있어서의 마술 . 한국개혁신학 논문집, 2, pp.58~82 (1997)
- "포도주 사건의 실체와 의미", 정용섭[URL]
- 지광운, "미신과 구습의 잔재", 활천컬럼. 활천사, ~ (1994)
- Aquin, Thomas d', "Somme contre les gentils", Cerf
- Bowden,H, "Classical Athens and the Delphic Oracle" (2005), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bovier de, "Oeuvres complètes", Fayard Le Corpus des oeuvres de philosophie de langue française, ~ (2001)
- "Histoire des Oracles"[URL]
- Lanson, G, "Histoire de la littérature française" (1929), Classiques Hachette
- Russell, Jeffrey Burton, "악마의 문화사" (1999), 황금가지
- Niderst,Alain, "Fontenelle à la recherche de lui-même (1657-1702)" (1972), Nizet
- Pomponazzi, Pietro, "De Incantationibus : De Naturalium effectum causis sive de incantationibus" (1970), George Olms
- Weber, Max, "The Sociology of Religion (1922)" (1922), Beacon Press