진독수의 과학사상
A Study on the Scientific Thought of Ch'en Tu-hsiu
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to clarify the substance of Ch’en Tu-hsiu’s scientific thought. The study focuses on Ch’en Tu-hsiu’s ideological conversion with his basic recognition and partially examines the nature of Chinese Scientism. In his days, not simple changes on social system but fundamental conversion of perception was required to break an old customs and construct a new society. He discovered the basis of the perception on scientific thought. For him, science was ‘power of thought’ and a means to revolutionize the era and the society as the motivity for an ideological conversion. First, he suggested scientific world view for the basis of ideological perception. He urged Chinese who were imbued with old customs and ignorance at that time to convert their awareness and perception through scientific reason. Furthermore, he asserted destruction of organic view of nature, personified nature, the relativistic theory of Yin and Yang(陰陽說), adults in idolization (聖敎,聖言), religious superstition etc. not to disturb the development of Natural Science. Second, he sought a way to social reforms reflecting the social function of science by expanding natural sciences to social sciences. He insisted human liberation based on human rights theory, stressed out the progress of mankind through social Darwinism, demanded the conversion of the scientific empirical era by accepting Comte’s the History Development theory and the maximization of the utility of things by imposing utilitarianism. Third, he proposed scientific socialism as a feasible alternative associating the concept of social science with practical logic. After reviewing five types of socialism, he ruled out anarchism without a means of revolution - national authority - for the priority, and also regarded Syndicalism and Guild-socialism based on the anarchism as immature socialism forms. Fourth, he compared national socialism(social democracy) and communism for viable socialism types. From his perspective, communism was preferred to national socialism. Because he thought that the former was based on the alliance between labor and management, parliament politics, democratic politics, nationalism etc., whereas, the latter was founded on class struggle, direct action, proletarian dictatorship and the international movement, and it was more corresponding to「Doctrine」of Marxism. He also considered that under scientific cognition, historical perception of scientific socialism enabled the establishment of socialist economic system in the country which formed the national superstructure on the basis of the material conditions. In the May Fourth era, beginning with human thought liberation and human modernization, he made a comparison with eastern, western scientific perspectives, and his scientific thought finally presented modern scientific view point significantly taking account of independent reason and formal logic. By these, he converted Chinese scientific point of view from ancient one to modern one. His new scientific idea encouraged to develop and change the Chinese modern scientific thought, and brought about results progressing and reinforcing the trend of Chinese scientism during the period.
Abstract
This study is to clarify the substance of Ch’en Tu-hsiu’s scientific thought. The study focuses on Ch’en Tu-hsiu’s ideological conversion with his basic recognition and partially examines the nature of Chinese Scientism. In his days, not simple changes on social system but fundamental conversion of perception was required to break an old customs and construct a new society. He discovered the basis of the perception on scientific thought. For him, science was ‘power of thought’ and a means to revolutionize the era and the society as the motivity for an ideological conversion. First, he suggested scientific world view for the basis of ideological perception. He urged Chinese who were imbued with old customs and ignorance at that time to convert their awareness and perception through scientific reason. Furthermore, he asserted destruction of organic view of nature, personified nature, the relativistic theory of Yin and Yang(陰陽說), adults in idolization (聖敎,聖言), religious superstition etc. not to disturb the development of Natural Science. Second, he sought a way to social reforms reflecting the social function of science by expanding natural sciences to social sciences. He insisted human liberation based on human rights theory, stressed out the progress of mankind through social Darwinism, demanded the conversion of the scientific empirical era by accepting Comte’s the History Development theory and the maximization of the utility of things by imposing utilitarianism. Third, he proposed scientific socialism as a feasible alternative associating the concept of social science with practical logic. After reviewing five types of socialism, he ruled out anarchism without a means of revolution - national authority - for the priority, and also regarded Syndicalism and Guild-socialism based on the anarchism as immature socialism forms. Fourth, he compared national socialism(social democracy) and communism for viable socialism types. From his perspective, communism was preferred to national socialism. Because he thought that the former was based on the alliance between labor and management, parliament politics, democratic politics, nationalism etc., whereas, the latter was founded on class struggle, direct action, proletarian dictatorship and the international movement, and it was more corresponding to「Doctrine」of Marxism. He also considered that under scientific cognition, historical perception of scientific socialism enabled the establishment of socialist economic system in the country which formed the national superstructure on the basis of the material conditions. In the May Fourth era, beginning with human thought liberation and human modernization, he made a comparison with eastern, western scientific perspectives, and his scientific thought finally presented modern scientific view point significantly taking account of independent reason and formal logic. By these, he converted Chinese scientific point of view from ancient one to modern one. His new scientific idea encouraged to develop and change the Chinese modern scientific thought, and brought about results progressing and reinforcing the trend of Chinese scientism during the period.
참고문헌 (47)
- 林茂生, "「關於評價陳獨秀的中一些問題」,「再評價陳獨秀」, In 林茂生自選集", pp.198~230 (2007), 中國人民大學出版社
- 陳獨秀, "愛國心與自覺心", 甲寅雜誌, 1(4)
- 任建樹, "陳獨秀著作選", pp.113~119 (1993), 上海人民出版社
- D. W. Y. Kwok, "Scientism in Chinese Thought 1900-1950", pp.59~ (1971), Yale University, BIBLO and TANNEN
- Benjamin I. Schwartz, "Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao", pp.9~10 (1951), Cambridge University Press
- 彭國興, "陳獨秀, 胡適, 蔡元培科學思想比較", 長安大學學報, 6(1), pp.11~14 (2004)
- 徐亞東, "陳獨秀與胡適科學觀之比較-兼論"五四"的"唯科學主義"", 中州學刊, 3(159), pp.229~232 (2007)
- 鄧文金, "五四時期陳獨秀科學思想述論", 聯城大學學報, pp.77~87 (2001)
- 黃偉, "陳獨秀科學思想硏究-兼與陳獨秀唯科學主義論者商確", 安徽史學, pp.121~125 (2007)
- 陳獨秀, "敬告靑年", 新靑年, 1(1) (1915)
- 任建樹, "陳獨秀著作選", pp.134~388 (1993), 上海人民出版社
- 陳獨秀, "東西民族根本思想之差異", 新靑年, 1(4)
- "陳獨秀文章選編(上)", pp.98~100 (1984), 三聯書店
- 장회익, "삶과 온생명", pp.14~20 (1998), 솔출판사
- 陳獨秀, "陰陽家", 新靑年, 5(1)
- 陳獨秀, "陳獨秀文章選編(上)", pp.78~512 (1984), 三聯書店
- 陳獨秀, "答畢平(廣東-科學思想)", 新靑年, 9(2)
- 陳獨秀, "陳獨秀文章選編(中)", pp.177~471 (1984), 三聯書店
- 陳獨秀, "聖言與學術", 新靑年, 5(2)
- 陳獨秀, "今日中國之政治問題", 新靑年, 5(1)
- 陳獨秀, "有鬼論質疑", 新靑年, 4(5)
- 陳獨秀, "陳獨秀著作選", pp.136~378 (1993), 上海人民出版社
- 陳獨秀, "再質有鬼論", 新靑年, 5(2)
- 任建樹, "陳獨秀著作選", pp.394~551
- 陳獨秀, "科學與神聖", 新靑年, 5(1)
- 陳獨秀, "偶像破壞論", 新靑年, 5(2)
- 陳獨秀, "新文化運動是什麽", 新靑年, 7(5)
- 陳獨秀, "法蘭西人與近世文明", 靑年雜誌, 1(1)
- 陳獨秀, "獨秀文存", pp.3~185 (1987), 安徽人民出版社
- 陳獨秀, "『新靑年』罪安之答辯書", 新靑年, 6(1)
- "獨秀文存", 4~83
- 濮淸泉, "我所知道的陳獨秀", pp.61~ (1986), 中國文史出版社
- 陳獨秀, "法蘭西人與近世文明", 靑年雜誌, 1(1)
- 李炳柱, "中國意識의 危機", pp.79~81 (1990), 大光出版社
- Chih Yu-ju, "The political thought of ch’en Tu-hsiu", 박사, pp.1965
- 陳獨秀, "一九一六", 新靑年, 1(5)
- 陳獨秀, "孔子之道與現代生活", 新靑年, 2(4)
- 陳獨秀, "科學與人生觀ㆍ序, In 科學與人生觀" (1923), 兒童圖書館出版
- 陳獨秀, "質問『東方』雜誌記者 -『東方』雜誌與復辟問題", ~ (1916)
- 許增, "陳獨秀의 ‘新敎育’論", 중국사연구, 26, pp.231~270 (2003), 중국사학회
- 허증, "1920년대 ‘과학․현학’ 논쟁과 ‘救亡’ 의식", 대구사학, 103, pp.239~278 (2011), 대구사학회
- 陳獨秀, "法蘭西人과 與近世文明", 靑年雜誌, 1(1)
- 梁國榮, "科學的形上之維", pp.19~ (1999), 上海人民出版社
- 陳獨秀, "談政治", 新靑年, 8(1)
- 陳獨秀, "社會主義批評", 廣東群報 (1921)
- 허증, "진독수 5ㆍ4 신문화운동의 기수, 중공 창당의 주역-그의 대중민주주의론과 역사인식", ~
- 이병주, "중국근대화를 이끈 걸출한 인물", pp.401~427 (2006), 지식산업사
