본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

南宋 문인의 三國 역사관 고찰 - 蜀漢 정통론과 인물 담론을 중심으로

Southern Song Dynasty Literati’s Understanding of the Three Kingdoms History

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This article is to confirm various discourses of Records of the Three Kingdoms from authentic history, Records of the Three Kingdoms up to Romance of the Three Kingdoms and to investigate the historical view on three kingdoms of the scholars in South Song dynasty as a kind of investigation on the cultural meanings. As Song dynasty showed the obvious difference on the historical view for Three Kingdoms between North and South Song, it was the period to shift from legitimism of Cao Wei in North Song that attached the importance of trend and shape to legitimism of Shu Han that attached the importance of justice and faith. Hence, the establishment courses of Shu Han legitimism were reviewed and its facts that the scholars in South Song dynasty established were investigated in this study. In addition, we reviewed the evaluations on the characters in Three Kingdoms by Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Zhuge Liang, and Xun Yu. The scholars in North Song Dynasty tried to evaluate them in view of practicality differentiating from public and private matters clearly, while those in South Song Dynasty established the framework of the virtue and the vice by Liu Bei and Cao Cao. They described Zhuge Liang as the super powered man who had both the talents and the nobility, but maintained the critic tone to Xun Yu who joined in Cao Cao. Of course, these historical views on Three Kingdoms were from the special political environment of South Song Dynasty, however, it was confirmed that the emphasis on the roles of the literati as the teachers was exposed into this historical view, too. Hence, this article has the meaning to prepare the momentum to review on the meanings of historical views on Three Kingdoms by the scholars of South Song Dynasty while authentic history, Records of the Three Kingdoms was shifting into Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

Abstract

This article is to confirm various discourses of Records of the Three Kingdoms from authentic history, Records of the Three Kingdoms up to Romance of the Three Kingdoms and to investigate the historical view on three kingdoms of the scholars in South Song dynasty as a kind of investigation on the cultural meanings. As Song dynasty showed the obvious difference on the historical view for Three Kingdoms between North and South Song, it was the period to shift from legitimism of Cao Wei in North Song that attached the importance of trend and shape to legitimism of Shu Han that attached the importance of justice and faith. Hence, the establishment courses of Shu Han legitimism were reviewed and its facts that the scholars in South Song dynasty established were investigated in this study. In addition, we reviewed the evaluations on the characters in Three Kingdoms by Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Zhuge Liang, and Xun Yu. The scholars in North Song Dynasty tried to evaluate them in view of practicality differentiating from public and private matters clearly, while those in South Song Dynasty established the framework of the virtue and the vice by Liu Bei and Cao Cao. They described Zhuge Liang as the super powered man who had both the talents and the nobility, but maintained the critic tone to Xun Yu who joined in Cao Cao. Of course, these historical views on Three Kingdoms were from the special political environment of South Song Dynasty, however, it was confirmed that the emphasis on the roles of the literati as the teachers was exposed into this historical view, too. Hence, this article has the meaning to prepare the momentum to review on the meanings of historical views on Three Kingdoms by the scholars of South Song Dynasty while authentic history, Records of the Three Kingdoms was shifting into Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 閔斗基, "中國의 歷史認識(下)" (1985), 창작과 비평사
  2. 서경호, "중심과 주변의 삼중주" (2015), 소명출판
  3. E.H. Carr, "역사란 무엇인가" (1999), 까치
  4. 이나미 리츠코, "삼국지 깊이 읽기" (2007), 작가정신
  5. 피터 K. 볼, "중국 지식인들의 정체성" (2008), 북스토리
  6. 陳 亮, "龍川文集" (1985), 中華書局
  7. 陳俊民, "朱子文集" (2000), 德富文敎基金會
  8. 陳 壽, "三國志" (1968), 臺灣商務印書館
  9. 葛兆光, "中國思想史" (2005), 復旦大學出版社
  10. 李逸安, "歐陽脩全集" (2001), 中華書局
  11. 梁啓超, "飮冰室全集" (1978), 大方出版社
  12. 劉克莊, "後村詩話" (1971), 廣文書局
  13. 茅 維, "蘇軾文集" (1999), 中華書局
  14. 司馬光, "資治通鑑" (1996), 中華書局
  15. 孫立堯, "宋代史論硏究" (2009), 中華書局
  16. 饒宗頤, "中國史學上之正統論" (1977), 宗靑圖書出版公司
  17. 葉 適, "葉適集 水心別集" (1983), 中華書局
  18. 永瑢, "四庫全書總目" (2003), 中華書局
  19. 余英時, "士與中國文化" (2009), 上海人民出版社
  20. 曾棗莊, "全宋文" (2006), 上海辭書出版社;安徽敎育出版社
  21. 朱傑人, "朱子全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社;安徽敎育出版社
  22. 朱 熹, "晦庵集", 文淵閣四庫全書本, ~
  23. 김보경, "北宋 蘇軾의 삼국 역사관 고찰", 중어중문학, (62), pp.3~25 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
  24. 이소영, "≪三國演義≫ 다시 읽기 (2) ― 諸葛亮, 지식인의 상상적 자아", 중국문학, 48, pp.139~163 (2006), 한국중국어문학회
  25. 민병희, "朱熹의 사회‧정치적 구상으로서의 “學” ― “功利之學,” “空虛之學”과의 대조를 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (104), pp.85~120 (2008), 동양사학회
  26. 양종국, "송대 사대부사회의 형성과 사대부의 활동유형 분석", 역사와 역사교육, (11) (2006)
  27. 오태석, "북송 문화의 混種性과 이학문예심미", 중국어문학지, (34), pp.59~102 (2010), 중국어문학회
  28. 曹鵬程, "試論南宋的正統論", 四川師範大學學報(社會科學版), 40(5) (2013)
  29. 紀德君, "論≪三國志演義≫與≪通鑑≫≪通鑑綱目≫之關係", 學術硏究, (5) (2004)
  30. 張 毅, "蘇軾朱熹文化人格之比較", 文學遺産, (4) (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)