《三國演義》 詩歌 編入過程 硏究
A Study on The compiling Process of Poems at ≪Three Kingdoms≫
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The novel 《Three Kingdoms》 was completed through a variety of forms, including Jiangchang(講唱) in Song-Yuan dynasty. The stories of the folk heroes at the Three Kingdoms’ Period were settled through a lengthy series of novels. The poems at 《Three Kingdoms》 facilitates the storyline and provides an aesthetic function that builds the direction of the narrative. Based on the sympathetic understanding of the characters, the poems give readers the pleasures to discover and enjoy some new meaning and value at life. Furthermore it is thought they have played a very important role in strengthening the operation of poems at Ming-Qing novel as well. The significance of this paper is that it has taken an overall investigation of Jiajing edition(嘉靖本) and Mao edition(毛本) of 《Three Kingdoms》 for the first time, including《全相三國志平話》 which have not yet been studied by any researchers, domestic or foreign. The absolute majority of authors and titles in the novel poems seem to be very difficult to identify. It would be needed to continue to explore and research them deeply and widely.
Abstract
The novel 《Three Kingdoms》 was completed through a variety of forms, including Jiangchang(講唱) in Song-Yuan dynasty. The stories of the folk heroes at the Three Kingdoms’ Period were settled through a lengthy series of novels. The poems at 《Three Kingdoms》 facilitates the storyline and provides an aesthetic function that builds the direction of the narrative. Based on the sympathetic understanding of the characters, the poems give readers the pleasures to discover and enjoy some new meaning and value at life. Furthermore it is thought they have played a very important role in strengthening the operation of poems at Ming-Qing novel as well. The significance of this paper is that it has taken an overall investigation of Jiajing edition(嘉靖本) and Mao edition(毛本) of 《Three Kingdoms》 for the first time, including《全相三國志平話》 which have not yet been studied by any researchers, domestic or foreign. The absolute majority of authors and titles in the novel poems seem to be very difficult to identify. It would be needed to continue to explore and research them deeply and widely.
참고문헌 (42)
- "建安虞氏新刊, 《新全相三國志平話》(至治新刊)", ~
- 湯學士, "古本小說集成⋅三國志傳", 上海古籍出版社
- 羅貫中, "三國演義" (2006), 中華書局
- 關德富, "中國四大名著 詩詞解析" (1999), 吉林人民出版社
- 羅貫中, "嘉靖本《三國演義》(上⋅下)" (2010), 岳麓書社
- 立間祥介, "新全相三國志平話" (2011), 潮出版社
- 胡士瑩, "話本小說槪論" (1982), 中華書局
- 劉大杰, "中國文學發達史" (1983), 華正書局
- 抱甕老人, "今古奇觀" (1983), 陽明書局
- 葉慶炳, "中國文學史, 上冊" (1987), 學生書局
- 吳庚舜, "唐代文學史, 下冊" (1995), 人民文學出版社
- 劉義慶, "世說新語⋅言語⋅第二" (2010), 吉林文史出版社
- 何东, "《三国演义》中诗词运用的艺术", 碩士, pp.2007
- 吴鸿俊, "移情视角下《三国演义》的诗词对比研究", 碩士, pp.2014
- 彭飞, "試述《三國縯義》成書前後的三國戲", 《上海大學學報》 社會科學版, (1) (1985)
- 劉永良, "毛宗崗對《三國演義》詩詞歌賦的加工整理", 《山西師大學報》 社會科學版, 20(4) (1993)
- 厚艶芬, "《三國演義》 版本演變述略", 北方論叢, (4)통권 : 138 (1996)
- 李萬鈞, "“詩”在中國古典長篇小說中的功能", 文史哲, (3) (1996)
- 張志和, "由周靜軒詩看《三國演義》的版本演變", 河北師範大學學報, (6) (2000)
- 林驊, "《三國演義》的史與詩", 明淸小說硏究, (1)통권 : 63 (2002)
- 刘世德, "关于《三国志演义》嘉靖刊本的幾点思考", (1) (2004), 中国社会科学院 文学研究所
- 鄭鐵生, "周静軒詩在《三国演義》版本中的演變和意義", 明淸小說硏究, (4) (2005), 天津外國語學院
- 劉永良, "《三國演義》詩詞歌賦的藝術價値及其不足", 浙江師範大學學報, (6) (2006)
- 胡燕, "《三國演義》論贊詩新論", 西華師範大學學報, (1) (2009)
- 楊小平, "淺論《三國演義》中的詩歌", 明淸小說硏究, (4) (2009), 西華師範大學文學院
- 裴雲龙, "新论《三国志演义》中论赞诗文的演化", 明清小说研究, (1) (2011), 北京师范大学文学院
- 刘海燕, "《三国志演义》早期刻本的三個问题", (2) (2011), 福建师范大学文学院
- 赵望秦, "《三国志演义》中“静轩诗”是依据小说文本吟咏写作的", (9) (2012), 西师范大学 文学院
- 程毅中, "《三国志演义》與宋元话本", (2) (2012), 中央文史研究馆
- 王凌, "毛本《三國志演義》詩詞的互文性解讀", 《南京師大學報》 社會科學, (2) (2014), 古代文學硏究
- 安憶涵, "毛本《三国演義》中周靜軒詩硏究", 《河北北方學院學報》 社會科學版, 32(1) (2016)
- 金學主, "中國俗文學槪論" (1989), 韓國放送通信大學校出版部
- 金學主, "中國文學史" (2001), 신아사
- 徐敬浩, "中國小說史" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
- 魯迅, "中國小說史" (2004), 소망출판
- 정철생, "삼국지 시가 감상" (2007), 현암사
- 程毅中, "宋元話本" (2012), 學古房
- 鄭元基, "80년대 이후 〈삼국지연의〉연구 경향에 관한 고찰 : 관적, 성서, 판본 문제를 중심으로", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.1998
- 민관동, "《三國演義》의 國內 流入과 版本 硏究", 中國小說論叢 (1995)
- 李鎭國, "《三国演義》 毛批本의 詩詞 改訂考", 曉大論文集, 48 (1994)
- 李鎭國, "《三国演義》의 對比修辭法 硏究> <毛評>의 분석과 관련하여", 인문과학연구, 2 (1999)
- 이시찬, "『醉翁談錄』의 중국소설사적 의미", 漢文敎育硏究, 23(1), pp.113~136 (2004), 한국한문교육학회