현대중국어 ‘这’와 ‘这個’에 대한 小考
‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ in Mandarin Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses about the research of ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ in Mandarin Chinese. These questions have not been noticed so far, nor they have been studied in detail. While former studied on such words that are based on the pragmatic meaning difference, this paper focuses on the grammatical elements. This paper gives full details of the ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ as a subject. The scholars have made many achievements researching about ‘Ge’ in Chinese. And it was accepted that ‘Ge’ is in a constant mitigating process from quantity to non-quantity. For that reason there is a significant disparity between of ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ because modality function of ‘Ge’. Special interest is ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ as a object. What decisively marks off the ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ is existence of ‘Ge’. A ‘Ge’ in Chinese and A ‘-Geos’ in Korean are structurally analogous to each other. Among all the Bound Noun in Korean, ‘-Geos’ becomes a noun when ‘-Geos’ is used together with a demonstrative pronoun. With this in mind there is a striking analogy between A ‘Ge’ in Chinese and A ‘-Geos’ in Korean.
Abstract
This paper discusses about the research of ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ in Mandarin Chinese. These questions have not been noticed so far, nor they have been studied in detail. While former studied on such words that are based on the pragmatic meaning difference, this paper focuses on the grammatical elements. This paper gives full details of the ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ as a subject. The scholars have made many achievements researching about ‘Ge’ in Chinese. And it was accepted that ‘Ge’ is in a constant mitigating process from quantity to non-quantity. For that reason there is a significant disparity between of ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ because modality function of ‘Ge’. Special interest is ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ as a object. What decisively marks off the ‘Zhe’ and ‘Zhege’ is existence of ‘Ge’. A ‘Ge’ in Chinese and A ‘-Geos’ in Korean are structurally analogous to each other. Among all the Bound Noun in Korean, ‘-Geos’ becomes a noun when ‘-Geos’ is used together with a demonstrative pronoun. With this in mind there is a striking analogy between A ‘Ge’ in Chinese and A ‘-Geos’ in Korean.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김영민, "현대중국어 임시양사 小考", 중국어문논역총간, S(20), pp.98~116 (2007), 중국어문논역학회
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2007), 탑출판사
- 민경모, "지시사 수식 명사구의 유형 및 특징에 대하여", 國語學, (60), pp.123~145 (2011), 국어학회
- 신경미, "현대중국어 직시어 ‘這’와 ‘那’에 대한 고찰", 중국어문논총, (64), pp.57~73 (2014), 중국어문연구회
- 안기섭, "현대중국어의 양상(Modality) 관련 표현에 대한 일 고찰", 중국인문과학, (47), pp.109~138 (2011), 중국인문학회
- 안정아, "현대 국어 의존 명사의 의미 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2007
- 양명희, "비지시 대용어의 대용성", 한국어 의미학, 19, pp.105~124 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 이운재, "유형학적 관점에서 본 중국어 명사구의 지시적 특징", 중국문학, 82, pp.241~259 (2015), 한국중국어문학회
- 이창호, "코퍼스에 기초한 ‘수사+개체양사+的+명사’ 분석― 현대중국어 명사 어구 연구의 한 방법론", 중국어문학논집, (58), pp.265~286 (2009), 중국어문학연구회
- 정은희, "의존명사 ‘것’의 의미 특성과 문법적 변이 양상", 나랏말쌈, (20), pp.136~150 (2005)
- 진염평, "의존명사 ‘것’의 이형태 ‘거", 걸’의 정립을 위한 시론, 2013, pp.41(4), 55~79[DOI]
- 范偉, "關於“這是...”和“這個是...”用法差異的認知解釋", 語言教學與研究, (3), pp.73~76 (2001)
- 梁玉玲, "單個“這”和“那”篇章不對稱硏究", 世界漢語教學, (4), pp.33~42 (2006)
- 陸儉明, "這是...”和“這個是...", 語言教學與研究, (2), pp.25~35 (1999)
- 任 鷹, "“個”的主觀赋量功能及其語義基礎", 世界漢語敎學, (3), pp.362~375 (2013)
- 杉村博文, "量詞“個”的文化屬性激活功能和語義的動態理解", 世界漢語敎學, (3), pp.17~22 (2006)
- 石毓智, "“個”標記賓語的功能", 語文硏究, (4), pp.14~19 (2003)
- 宗守雲, "也談“這是...”和“這個是...”", 語言教學與研究, (3), pp.77~80 (2001)
- Charles N. Li, "표준 중국어 문법" (2001), 한울아카데미
- D. Alan Cruse, "인지언어학" (2010), 박이정
- 김문기, "문법의 진화-시제, 상, 양태" (2010), 소통