상고중국어 名源動詞의 분류 및 형태론적 의미
Classification and Morphological Meaning of Denominal Verbs in Archaic Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The denominal verbs of Archaic Chinese has lasted until modern Chinese. The denominal verbs are originally derived from nouns without changing their form. At the time of Archaic Chinese, this was already hundreds of them, and it was very prevalent. In general, since Archaic Chinese is viewed as an isolated language, the denominal verb was viewed only as a conversion. However, in recent years, the modification of Archaic Chinese has been studied by many scholars, and various prefixes, suffixes, and inflectional affixes have been discovered. Thus, the denominal verb was viewed from a new perspective. The denominal verbs of Archaic Chinese is largely divided into ‘derivation’ and ‘zero-derivation’. Among them, derivation is the addition of visible affixes or refractive affixes, on the other hand, zero derivation actually has an invisible affix. Denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese can be classified according to the meaning type of the root noun. Denominal verbs are also divided into fixed and temporary usage. Traditionally, temporary uses have been classified separately. However, this is a kind of ‘innovation’ that emerges in the process of changing one meaning to another(semanticization). Therefore, this paper sees it as a kind of continuous process. Denominal verbs are generally divided into four categories: natural type, artificial & social type, spatial type, and abstract type. Each of the root nouns becomes a denominal verb through a metonymical action suitable for their conceptual domain. Exploring their verbalization process will continue in the next study.
Abstract
The denominal verbs of Archaic Chinese has lasted until modern Chinese. The denominal verbs are originally derived from nouns without changing their form. At the time of Archaic Chinese, this was already hundreds of them, and it was very prevalent. In general, since Archaic Chinese is viewed as an isolated language, the denominal verb was viewed only as a conversion. However, in recent years, the modification of Archaic Chinese has been studied by many scholars, and various prefixes, suffixes, and inflectional affixes have been discovered. Thus, the denominal verb was viewed from a new perspective. The denominal verbs of Archaic Chinese is largely divided into ‘derivation’ and ‘zero-derivation’. Among them, derivation is the addition of visible affixes or refractive affixes, on the other hand, zero derivation actually has an invisible affix. Denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese can be classified according to the meaning type of the root noun. Denominal verbs are also divided into fixed and temporary usage. Traditionally, temporary uses have been classified separately. However, this is a kind of ‘innovation’ that emerges in the process of changing one meaning to another(semanticization). Therefore, this paper sees it as a kind of continuous process. Denominal verbs are generally divided into four categories: natural type, artificial & social type, spatial type, and abstract type. Each of the root nouns becomes a denominal verb through a metonymical action suitable for their conceptual domain. Exploring their verbalization process will continue in the next study.
참고문헌 (62)
- 박원기, "百喩經의 언어 : 중고중국어의 세계" (2015), 학고방
- 여도수, "영어의 ∅파생 동사화 전환", 공주영상정보대학논문집, (8), pp.133~151 (2001)
- 이소동, "고대중국어 동사화 연구", 중국문학연구, (54), pp.473~498 (2014), 한국중문학회
- 이소동, "고대중국어 동사화의 내포동사 분석", 중국어문논총, (91), pp.1~27 (2019), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 정한성, "무형파생의 방향성", 영어영문학, 8, pp.287~309 (1993)
- 程俊英, "詩經注析" (1991), 中華書局
- 范寧, "春秋穀梁傳" (1970), 中華書局
- 賈昌朝, "群經音辨" (2020), 中華書局
- 高芳, "名動轉用語用推理的認知策略", 外語與外語敎學, (1), pp.13~20 (2000)
- 高誘, "戰國策" (1966), 中華書局
- 管仲, "管子" (1966), 中華書局
- 郭慶藩, "莊子集釋" (1989), 中華書局
- 漢語大詞典編纂委員會, "漢語大詞典" (1995), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 何星, "識解操作與名動互轉", 外語硏究, (2), pp.12~18 (2007)
- 何休, "春秋公羊傳" (1981), 中華書局
- 蔣紹愚, "再談“從綜合到分析”", 語文硏究, (1), pp.1~13 (2021)
- 解惠全, "古書虛詞通解" (2008), 中華書局
- 金理新, "上古漢語形態硏究" (2006), 黃山書社
- 金理新, "上古漢語形態導論" (2021), 黃山書社
- 老子, "老子" (1966), 中華書局
- 李學勤, "字源" (2012), 天津古籍出版社
- 李佐豊, "上古漢語語法硏究" (2003), 北京廣播學院出版社
- 陸費達, "尙書今古文注疏" (1988), 中華書局
- 羅濤, "上古漢語名源動詞硏究", 碩士, pp.2013
- 任荷, "‘名詞動用’與上古漢語名詞和動詞的語義屬性" (2020), 中國社會科學出版社
- 史文磊, "漢語歷史語法" (2021), 中華書局
- 司馬遷, "史記" (2006), 中華書局
- 宋作艶, "名詞轉動詞的語義基礎", 中國語文, (3), pp.295~383 (2018)
- 孫詒讓, "漢文大系" (1980), 寶蓮閣
- 孫玉文, "漢語變調構詞考辨" (2015), 商務印書館
- 王弼, "周易" (1966), 中華書局
- 王冬梅, "名詞動用現象的認知機制硏究", 河南科學學院學報, (11), pp.58~62 (2011)
- 王明, "名源動詞生成機制", 宜賓學院學報, 9(4), pp.95~102 (2018)
- 王明, "古漢語音變名源動詞探究", 紅河學院學報, (4), pp.112~119 (2019)
- 王明, "同一語義場的名源動詞", 沈陽工程學院學報, (2), pp.225~230 (2019)
- 王力, "王力古漢語字典" (2000), 中華書局
- 王先謙, "漢文大系" (1980), 寶蓮閣
- 王先謙, "韓非子集解" (1979), 商務印書館
- 王演, "構式語法硏究(上卷) : 理論思索" (2011), 上海外語敎育出版社
- 許嘉璐, "二十四史全譯" (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 楊伯峻, "春秋左傳注" (1990), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "論語譯注" (1980), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "孟子譯注" (1980), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展" (2001), 語文出版社
- 姚振武, "上古漢語語法史" (2015), 上海古籍出版社
- 葉玉麟, "國語" (1970), 商務印書館
- 袁健惠, "上古漢語的兩類名源動詞", 烟台大學學報, (2), pp.103~120 (2020)
- 張玉金, "甲骨文語法學" (2001), 學林出版社
- 張玉金, "論殷墟甲骨文中的兼語句", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (1), pp.51~59 (2003)
- 張玉金, "西周漢語語法硏究" (2004), 商務印書館
- 鄭玄, "漢文大系" (1980), 寶蓮閣
- 鄭玄, "周禮" (1966), 中華書局
- 鄭玄, "儀禮" (1966), 中華書局
- 周法高, "中國古代語法⋅構詞編" (1972), 臺聯國風出版社
- 中國社會科學院語言硏究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
- Downer, G. B., "Derivation by Tone Change in Classical Chinese", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 22 (1952)
- Don, J., "On Conversion, Relisting and Zero-derivation: A comment on Rochelle Lieber: English word-formation processes", SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2(2), pp.2~16 (2005)
- EveV. Clark, "When Nouns Surface as Verbs", Language, 55(4), pp.767~911 (1979)
- Elizabeth C. Traugott, "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Kiparsky, P., "Argument Structure", pp.473~499 (1997), CSLI
- Laurent Sagart, "The Roots of Old Chinese" (1999), John Benjamins P. C
- 이용성, "Conversion as Zero Affixation: Evidence from Affix Interaction", 영어학, 9(1), pp.135~160 (2009), 한국영어학회[DOI]